"Selected micronutrient intakes: percentage with intakes below the lower reference nutrient intake":

Say YES to beef, and say no to alternative sources of protein and taste sensations.
Moderator: Community Team
Jdsizzleslice wrote:Queen Margaret University - one of the top universities in the United Kingdom - has named and elevated beef as by far the most environmentally friendly ingredient in any meal
Dukasaur wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:Queen Margaret University - one of the top universities in the United Kingdom - has named and elevated beef as by far the most environmentally friendly ingredient in any meal
The study talks about the nutritional qualities of beef, which are admittedly good.
Unless you're reading some secret paragraph I can't find, it says nothing about its environmental costs.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:Queen Margaret University - one of the top universities in the United Kingdom - has named and elevated beef as by far the most environmentally friendly ingredient in any meal
The study talks about the nutritional qualities of beef, which are admittedly good.
Unless you're reading some secret paragraph I can't find, it says nothing about its environmental costs.
Environment of the meat itself.
Dukasaur wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:Dukasaur wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:Queen Margaret University - one of the top universities in the United Kingdom - has named and elevated beef as by far the most environmentally friendly ingredient in any meal
The study talks about the nutritional qualities of beef, which are admittedly good.
Unless you're reading some secret paragraph I can't find, it says nothing about its environmental costs.
Environment of the meat itself.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by the environment of the meat itself.
When most people talk about environmental costs, they're talking about the enormous amount of land taken up by beef production, and secondarily about the amount of water used.
mrswdk wrote:Also, what is it with old people and getting so triggered when anyone talks about protecting the environment? Is the idea of living sustainably in order to avert a climate disaster really so outrageous and unacceptable to you?
HitRed wrote:What could be healthier than eating krill all day?
mrswdk wrote:Also, what is it with old people and getting so triggered when anyone talks about protecting the environment?
DoomYoshi wrote:If they are bad for the environment I'm helping by eating them. Once we eat them, they can't harm the planet.
2dimes wrote:I can't remember for sure but we did sit at a table together once and ate, we probably joined forces against the cows.
jimboston wrote:mrswdk wrote:Also, what is it with old people and getting so triggered when anyone talks about protecting the environment? Is the idea of living sustainably in order to avert a climate disaster really so outrageous and unacceptable to you?
Please define “old” people.
How old does one have to be for you to consider them old in this context?
mrswdk wrote:tzor agrees. The less beef and dairy that we eat, the kinder we are to our atmosphere. Therefore consuming lots and lots of beef and dairy is the worst thing we could do, consuming none is the best thing we could do.
tzor wrote:mrswdk wrote:tzor agrees. The less beef and dairy that we eat, the kinder we are to our atmosphere. Therefore consuming lots and lots of beef and dairy is the worst thing we could do, consuming none is the best thing we could do.
No, the question is never binary.
2dimes wrote:A big part of the reason for cows lactating too much is the hormones they are given in the US.
We are not certified organic, nor are we seeking to be. We raise our animals and grow our food the way our ancestors did. We do not use antibiotics, steroids, or growth hormones (BGH or BST). We try to farm as close to nature as we can. However, should the occasion arise where we need to treat an animal or crop to prevent death or loss, we will utilize every option available to us. That animal or product will never be offered to the public until we have cleared any such treatment from its system.
tzor wrote:2dimes wrote:A big part of the reason for cows lactating too much is the hormones they are given in the US.
We have a local small scale dairy farm Goodale Farms where they state the following on their website.We are not certified organic, nor are we seeking to be. We raise our animals and grow our food the way our ancestors did. We do not use antibiotics, steroids, or growth hormones (BGH or BST). We try to farm as close to nature as we can. However, should the occasion arise where we need to treat an animal or crop to prevent death or loss, we will utilize every option available to us. That animal or product will never be offered to the public until we have cleared any such treatment from its system.
In a recent article in the local online newspaper, the Riverhead Local, PETA protests at Aquebogue dairy farm, the founder of the farm, Hal Goodale, stated, “Mothers produce between five and six pounds of milk per day and calves can only drink about one pound per day. If we don’t milk the mothers they will get sick.”
I think a big reason might be the old fashioned thing ... breeding. There has been a big change in the US over the course of the last century to go from "creamers" to "milkers" or quantity over quality. No one in the US wants milk where the "cream rises to the top" and in fact there is a considerable desire for as thin a milk as possible.
Users browsing this forum: dangyc