Page 1 of 4
Unofficial JoeBeevers Petition
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:50 pmby dwightschrute
This is a petition to get JoeBeevers off the site. You know what he has done. He may be funny, but he still hasn't played a game and is a multi.
1. dwightschrute
2. kwanton
3. dustn64
4. The1exile
5. hecter
6. willis
7. Fircoal
8. Huckleberryhound
9. DirtyDishSoap
10. DiM
11. Serbia
12. firth
13. Minister Masket
14. Diddle
15. Chad
16. GreecePwns
17. Chrystal Halon
18. n8freeman
19. magneticgoop
20. cena-rules
21. UCABears
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:50 pmby dustn64
1.dustn64
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:50 pmby The1exile
2. The1exile
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:51 pmby hecter
dustn64 wrote:1.dustn64
2. hecter
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:52 pmby dustn64
dustn64 wrote:1.dustn64
2. hecter
3.The1exile
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:52 pmby dwightschrute
just post if you want in.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:53 pmby unriggable
I dont really care. We all get to make fun of his rodent ass
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:53 pmby Huckleberryhound
No, i wont put my name to this.
I think as americans, you are being a bit hypocritical on the old free speech malarky.
Beaver is a plonker, but there is proper mod proceedures, and if he's crossed the lines, he'll been banned.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:53 pmby dwightschrute
unriggable wrote:I dont really care. We all get to make fun of his rodent ass
in or out?
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:53 pmby unriggable
Huckleberryhound wrote:No, i wont put my name to this.
QFT
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:54 pmby willis
chirp
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:54 pmby dwightschrute
Huckleberryhound wrote:No, i wont put my name to this.
I think as americans, you are being a bit hypocritical on the old free speech malarky.
Beaver is a plonker, but there is proper mod proceedures, and if he's crossed the lines, he'll been banned.
alright that is fine.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:58 pmby kwanton
Huckleberryhound wrote:No, i wont put my name to this.
I think as americans, you are being a bit hypocritical on the old free speech malarky.
Beaver is a plonker, but there is proper mod proceedures, and if he's crossed the lines, he'll been banned.
How bout those multis he made?
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:59 pmby unriggable
I doubt they were really multis.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:00 pmby Fircoal
1. dwightschrute
2. kwanton
3. dustn64
4. The1exile
5. hecter
6. willis
7. Fircoal
8.
Sure we are allowed free speech, but with free speech there are reposiblies.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:02 pmby Huckleberryhound
kwanton wrote:Huckleberryhound wrote:No, i wont put my name to this.
I think as americans, you are being a bit hypocritical on the old free speech malarky.
Beaver is a plonker, but there is proper mod proceedures, and if he's crossed the lines, he'll been banned.
How bout those multis he made?
Of course that is a bannable offence, but it's not for a kangaroo court to decide whether someone should post or not.
I think maybe his hard man act could do with a small ban, but i really don't care enough about the guy to want to start a lynch mob.
It's interesting to point out that you all seem keen enough to post in his threads, and no mod seems to delete them.
A phrase used in another forum i frequent seems to be relevant here..
DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:03 pmby kwanton
unriggable wrote:I doubt they were really multis.
Well sir, that is your opinion. I for one think they were multis. And don't you think that if we get enough members of the community to sign a petition to get him banned that there is a legitimate reason to ban him?
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:05 pmby Huckleberryhound
kwanton wrote:unriggable wrote:I doubt they were really multis.
Well sir, that is your opinion. I for one think they were multis. And don't you think that if we get enough members of the community to sign a petition to get him banned that there is a legitimate reason to ban him?
Definitely not.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:07 pmby unriggable
kwanton wrote:unriggable wrote:I doubt they were really multis.
Well sir, that is your opinion. I for one think they were multis. And don't you think that if we get enough members of the community to sign a petition to get him banned that there is a legitimate reason to ban him?
You mean like spamalot? Face it. It's not a democracy.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:08 pmby Huckleberryhound
I've changed my opinion.
he has no games started, and is therefore a troll in the very truest sense of the word.
lynch him
add me to the list boys.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:09 pmby dwightschrute
Huckleberryhound wrote:I've changed my opinion.
he has no games started, and is therefore a troll in the very truest sense of the word.
lynch him
add me to the list boys.
will do sir.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:10 pmby reverend_kyle
Woodstock Music and Art Fair was an event
held at Max Yasgur's 600 acre (2.4 km²) dairy farm
in the rural town of Bethel, New York from August 15
to August 18, 1969. Bethel is at least 50 driving miles
W/SW from the actual town of Woodstock, NY. For many,
the festival exemplified the counterculture of the 1960s
and the "hippie era." Thirty-two of the best-known musicians
of the day appeared during the sometimes rainy weekend.
Though attempts have been made over the years to recreate
the festival, the original Woodstock Festival of 1969 has
proven to be unique and legendary.
The event was captured in a successful 1970 movie,
Woodstock, and Joni Mitchell's song "Woodstock," which
memorialized the event, became a major hit for
Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:11 pmby kwanton
Gonna quote hecter on this un.
hecter wrote:AK_iceman wrote:Don't feed the trolls.
In
this thread.. It's hard to feed a troll that's been banned. So, BAN THEM ALREADY!!!
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:20 pmby AK_iceman
Changed the thread title.
Don't put "Official" in the title dwight, as this thread is anything but.
Posted:
Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:21 pmby kwanton
AK_iceman wrote:Changed the thread title.
Don't put "Official" in the title dwight, as this thread is anything but.
Wouldn't the correct term be unofficial?