Conquer Club

Federal agents raid Georgetown home of D.C. Council member Jack Evans

Federal agents on Friday searched the home of D.C. Council member Jack Evans (D-Ward 2), a day after the disclosure of a confidential memo that says Evans “repeatedly and proactively” used his position as chairman of the Metro board to help a company that was secretly paying him $50,000 per year.

Within hours of the conclusion of the FBI search, Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) announced that he would seek to strip Evans of his position as chairman of the council’s finance and revenue committee and appoint a panel to investigate him.

“It is imperative that public officials maintain high ethical standards,” Mendelson said. “Public trust is critical. At the same time, it is delicate and precious. We must now work to regain it.”

Evans has not been charged with a crime, and the council’s investigation could take months. But the federal and local actions signaled a once-unimaginable turning point for the District’s longest-serving elected official.

Is your next post going to about a democrat mayor of a small town in Alaska who broke the speed limit?

Don't be daft Mook- Nom is building up to an argument that all officials should be held accountable, even if they're the President.

Symmetry wrote:Don't be daft Mook- Nom is building up to an argument that all officials should be held accountable, even if they're the President.

your right everyone should be investigated if there is a suspicion they have done something wrong
. and if they are found guilty .. prosecute them..
if they are found innocent. then they should be left alone .
( innocent entails you investigate someone for say an accusation of colluding with a foreign power and no evidence was found to corroborate the accuation..)

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't be daft Mook- Nom is building up to an argument that all officials should be held accountable, even if they're the President.

your right everyone should be investigated if there is a suspicion they have done something wrong
. and if they are found guilty .. prosecute them..
if they are found innocent. then they should be left alone .
( innocent entails you investigate someone for say an accusation of colluding with a foreign power and no evidence was found to corroborate the accuation..)

Not read the Mueller report then, Nom? Fair enough.

Symmetry wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't be daft Mook- Nom is building up to an argument that all officials should be held accountable, even if they're the President.

your right everyone should be investigated if there is a suspicion they have done something wrong
. and if they are found guilty .. prosecute them..
if they are found innocent. then they should be left alone .
( innocent entails you investigate someone for say an accusation of colluding with a foreign power and no evidence was found to corroborate the accuation..)

Not read the Mueller report then, Nom? Fair enough.

quote the Mueller report where it says Trump committed a crime..

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't be daft Mook- Nom is building up to an argument that all officials should be held accountable, even if they're the President.

your right everyone should be investigated if there is a suspicion they have done something wrong
. and if they are found guilty .. prosecute them..
if they are found innocent. then they should be left alone .
( innocent entails you investigate someone for say an accusation of colluding with a foreign power and no evidence was found to corroborate the accuation..)

Not read the Mueller report then, Nom? Fair enough.

quote the Mueller report where it says Trump committed a crime..

You really should read some of it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report#Obstruction_of_justice

You really should read some of it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report#Obstruction_of_justice[/quote]

already have. but obviously you haven't or you would simply be able to quote the part where it says Trump committed a crime.

come on Sym.. this should be an easy one for you..
but you will forget what we are talking about now because your cornered. like usual..

Symmetry wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't be daft Mook- Nom is building up to an argument that all officials should be held accountable, even if they're the President.

your right everyone should be investigated if there is a suspicion they have done something wrong
. and if they are found guilty .. prosecute them..
if they are found innocent. then they should be left alone .
( innocent entails you investigate someone for say an accusation of colluding with a foreign power and no evidence was found to corroborate the accuation..)

Not read the Mueller report then, Nom? Fair enough.

I think we've already established he doesn't read past headlines, even when he's the one posting the links.

mookiemcgee wrote:I think we've already established he doesn't read past headlines, even when he's the one posting the links.

maybe you can help him then Mookie..
you quote where the Mueller Report says Trump Committed a crime.

it's easy. it's the part everyone is talking about. because it happened. there should be news clips YouTube videos. search engine topics on it. they would all have a quick reference to that section of the report.

mookiemcgee wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:Don't be daft Mook- Nom is building up to an argument that all officials should be held accountable, even if they're the President.

your right everyone should be investigated if there is a suspicion they have done something wrong
. and if they are found guilty .. prosecute them..
if they are found innocent. then they should be left alone .
( innocent entails you investigate someone for say an accusation of colluding with a foreign power and no evidence was found to corroborate the accuation..)

Not read the Mueller report then, Nom? Fair enough.

I think we've already established he doesn't read past headlines, even when he's the one posting the links.

Indeed. He get's a bit angry when that gets pointed out though.

NomadPatriot wrote:

mookiemcgee wrote:I think we've already established he doesn't read past headlines, even when he's the one posting the links.

maybe you can help him then Mookie..
you quote where the Mueller Report says Trump Committed a crime.

it's easy. it's the part everyone is talking about. because it happened. there should be news clips YouTube videos. search engine topics on it. they would all have a quick reference to that section of the report.

I've gotta be honest- I was ok with you pretending so far, but you kinda broke credibility with claiming that you couldn't find youtube videos, search engine topics, etc about Trump on this...

Really?

Symmetry wrote:I've gotta be honest- I was ok with you pretending so far, but you kinda broke credibility with claiming that you couldn't find youtube videos, search engine topics, etc about Trump on this...Really?

then go right ahead Sym. i'm waiting. post a link to anything that references the part of the mueller report that says trump committed a crime. why are you avoiding doing it.. ..
hmmm. we can only wonder . ( because the report doesn't say that.. )

NomadPatriot wrote:

Symmetry wrote:I've gotta be honest- I was ok with you pretending so far, but you kinda broke credibility with claiming that you couldn't find youtube videos, search engine topics, etc about Trump on this...Really?

then go right ahead Sym. i'm waiting. post a link to anything that references the part of the mueller report that says trump committed a crime. why are you avoiding doing it.. ..
hmmm. we can only wonder . ( because the report doesn't say that.. )

https://lmgtfy.com/?q=trump+obstruction+of+justice+Mueller+report

I consider this a compromise.

your link takes me to a page that tells me to do a google search..

NomadPatriot wrote:your link takes me to a page that tells me to do a google search..

Let me know how that goes.