1756257852
1756257852 Conquer Club • View topic - Say no to beef AND MILK
Page 1 of 4

Say no to beef AND MILK

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 5:47 am
by mrswdk
The University of Michigan - one of the top universities in the United States - has named and shamed beef as by far the most environmentally unfriendly ingredient in any meal:

Image

Say NO to beef, and say yes to alternative sources of protein and taste sensations.

Image

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:23 am
by TA1LGUNN3R
Well, beef really is the blandest of red meats.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 10:56 am
by 2dimes
Where do they get that environmentally friendly milk?

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:52 am
by mookiemcgee
2dimes wrote:Where do they get that environmentally friendly milk?


It's certainly not almond milk, almonds are some of the most water sucking crops grown.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:54 am
by DoomYoshi
I don't understand the equation with carbon dioxide = environmentally unfriendly. If that were the case, nobody would be allowed to breathe.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:14 pm
by mrswdk
mookiemcgee wrote:
2dimes wrote:Where do they get that environmentally friendly milk?


It's certainly not almond milk, almonds are some of the most water sucking crops grown.


Wrong (sort of). Almond milk is worse than other plant-based milks, but still far better than dairy milk.

Cows lose again!

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:19 pm
by HitRed
Lentils are the most underrated food.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 2:11 pm
by KoolBak
What I don't get is why on earth China-boy is quoting something from a heinous American source. Aren't all thing American anathema to him?

Unless it's convenient I guess :lol:

And aren't the japanese beef varieties the best? So they're the bad ones?? Pollutin our airs an such....

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 2:12 pm
by DoomYoshi
mrswdk wrote:
mookiemcgee wrote:
2dimes wrote:Where do they get that environmentally friendly milk?


It's certainly not almond milk, almonds are some of the most water sucking crops grown.


Wrong (sort of). Almond milk is worse than other plant-based milks, but still far better than dairy milk.

Cows lose again!


Almond nipples aren't very sexy though.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:54 pm
by jimboston
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Well, beef really is the blandest of red meats.


A nice Ribeye rocks.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 6:17 pm
by Symmetry
Seems a little pointless. It'd dead already, and even when it was alive it wouldn't understand.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 9:16 pm
by hotfire
It isn't the CO2 that is the problem. It is that the CO2 represents using more resources for a resource. Beef is inefficient and a bane to the average consumer by raising prices on all goods that use the same resources. Mainly oil and land. So everything.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:20 pm
by tzor
The problem with a lot of these things is that they are presented as an either or situation.
I think there is a key overlooked word here ... "per Serving"
Cut the beef serving size in half and you literally cut the CO2 cost in half.
Then again as a child growing up ion East Hampton, Long Island I was always a Potato and Meat kid.
HUGE wonderful potatoes
And meat
And vegetables
IN THAT ORDER.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:43 pm
by mookiemcgee
Distilling things down to basic numbers like this also overlooks key side benefits to farming or raising a certain type of crop/livestock.

I assume that these numbers are based on the idea that cattle is fed (likely corn) purchased and from a bag. When cattle are pasture raised and eat grass and other wild cover crops, they help fertilize soil when pasture raised and which helps other crops grow in a future cycle on the land. A pasture that was otherwise effectively fallow before the cattle came to eat the grass, may now be "mowed" and "fertilized" without any effort by the farmer, and is great land for farming veggies. Cattle offer many positive 'side effects' to the farms eco-system when pasture raised and not directly fed feed. It's really the whole mono-culture large farm agg system that causes beef to stand out as being environmentally unfriendly, but it's hard to ignore when done like this that it is not a CO2 friendly eat.

Here is a decent article about why cows are an important part of the farming ecosystem:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/actually-raising-beef-is-good-for-the-planet-1419030738

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 4:55 pm
by Dukasaur
mookiemcgee wrote:Distilling things down to basic numbers like this also overlooks key side benefits to farming or raising a certain type of crop/livestock.

I assume that these numbers are based on the idea that cattle is fed (likely corn) purchased and from a bag. When cattle are pasture raised and eat grass and other wild cover crops, they help fertilize soil when pasture raised and which helps other crops grow in a future cycle on the land. A pasture that was otherwise effectively fallow before the cattle came to eat the grass, may now be "mowed" and "fertilized" without any effort by the farmer, and is great land for farming veggies. Cattle offer many positive 'side effects' to the farms eco-system when pasture raised and not directly fed feed. It's really the whole mono-culture large farm agg system that causes beef to stand out as being environmentally unfriendly, but it's hard to ignore when done like this that it is not a CO2 friendly eat.

Here is a decent article about why cows are an important part of the farming ecosystem:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/actually-raising-beef-is-good-for-the-planet-1419030738


Can't read your article (paywall). However, no the fact that beef is by far the most inefficient meat source is a long-established fact.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/beef-uses-ten-times-more-resources-poultry-dairy-eggs-pork-180952103/
First, the researchers calculated the feed costs for each class of animal—beef, pork, chicken, laying hens and dairy cows. They did not include fish because data about resources used to raise those animals is limited, and fish only contributed about two percent of American’s animal-based energy intake from 2000 to 2013.

They used data collected between 2000 to 2010 from the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Interior and Energy about land area, water and nitrogen fertilizer to determine the burden produced by feeding and raising all of those animals. Then, they standardized the data by calories contained in a given amount of milk, eggs, beef, pork or chicken.

Read more: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science- ... SxOHPo4.99
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter

The findings, while expected, are quite sobering. Pork, chicken, dairy and eggs are equivalent within a factor of two when it came to their environmental burdens, the authors determined. But beef requires far, far more resources than any of those other protein categories. The team calculated that beef requires 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer and 11 times more water compared to those other food sources. That adds up to about five times more greenhouse gas emissions.
Read more: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science- ... SxOHPo4.99
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter


Even back in the 70s when Moon colonization was being studied, it was established that goats and rabbits are the only meat animals considered for colonization, as the only ones that have a reasonable ratio of grain intake to meat output. That was almost 50 year ago, and it's been studied a lot more since then.

I don't have time to dig up any really good articles, but the Smithsonian one will have to do as a starting point. It includes a link to the scholarly paper that it was taken from.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 7:58 am
by KoolBak
Ok crampy.....youve made SIX irrelevant posts now.

Is this one NOT a bot? Join a fooking game or 4 now....fella name of zeus111 wants to play ya!

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 3:59 am
by 2dimes
Bison are better because they wander off instead of eating all the grass in one pasture but bovine are easier to round up out on the range.


Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 11:38 pm
by TeeGee
mrswdk wrote:The University of Michigan - one of the top universities in the United States - has named and shamed beef as by far the most environmentally unfriendly ingredient in any meal:



Say NO to beef, and say yes to alternative sources of protein and taste sensations.




LIES!!

You told me you loved my sausage

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2019 12:36 pm
by tzor
2dimes wrote:Bison are better because they wander off instead of eating all the grass in one pasture but bovine are easier to round up out on the range.


Well bison is just plain better ... here are 9 ways.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2019 12:32 am
by karel
I don't care what these lame brain green people say I will never give up my beef,i eat meat 7 days a week once again the left pushing their lame shit again on to people

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Wed Apr 24, 2019 3:28 pm
by Bernie Sanders
karel wrote:I don't care what these lame brain green people say I will never give up my beef,i eat meat 7 days a week once again the left pushing their lame shit again on to people


I'm a lefty karel....let them eat meat. In fact I have a nice piece of meat for you, just open your mouth.

Re: Say no to beef AND MILK

PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 11:46 am
by mrswdk
OP updated. We must say no not just to beef but to ALL dairy products.

Drink up, Nazis.

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) is making the claim that milk is the perfect tipple for racists.

The organization tweeted: “Cows’ milk has long been a symbol used by white supremacists.”

In addition, the group claims the dairy industry inflicts extreme violence on cows, committing sins such as rape.


https://torontosun.com/news/world/peta- ... -supremacy

Metsfanmax was right all along. The dairy industry is not only environmentally unfriendly but it is also RACIST and it RAPES COWS.

Re: Say no to beef

PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 4:47 pm
by saxitoxin
mrswdk wrote:The University of Michigan - one of the top universities in the United States


DEBATABLE

TeeGee wrote:
mrswdk wrote:The University of Michigan - one of the top universities in the United States - has named and shamed beef as by far the most environmentally unfriendly ingredient in any meal:



Say NO to beef, and say yes to alternative sources of protein and taste sensations.




LIES!!

You told me you loved my sausage


he tells that to everyone

Re: Say no to beef AND MILK

PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2019 5:20 pm
by mrswdk
My favourite is blood sausage:

Image

And the best thing is, it's made of pig blood so it doesn't even violate the Beef Boycott (#Beefcott2019).