Moderator: Community Team
Pakistan's government has called attack a "conspiracy" against the strategic cooperation between Islamabad and Beijing.
On November 24, Pakistani counterterrorism police officer Umar Khitab said the attackers used a foreign-made C-4 plastic explosive and suggested that India was involved.
“The Prime Minister has ordered a complete inquiry into the incident and has desired that elements behind this incident must be unearthed,” Khan’s office said in a statement, adding that the attack was part of a conspiracy aimed at undermining economic and strategic cooperation between the two nations.
“Such incidents will never be able to undermine Pak-China relationship,” the statement added. Neighboring China is Pakistan’s closest ally, ploughing billions of dollars in loans and infrastructure investments into the South Asian nation as part of Beijing’s vast Belt and Road initiative.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
mrswdk wrote:It's sad really. China's approach to building relationships with other nations is to expend huge amounts of capital and energy helping them develop, while the default setting for America and its vassals is to treat international diplomacy as a game of king of the hill where they need to keep killing until they are the only ones left.
The case is one of the most vivid examples of China’s ambitious use of loans and aid to gain influence around the world — and of its willingness to play hardball to collect.
The debt deal also intensified some of the harshest accusations about President Xi Jinping’s signature Belt and Road Initiative: that the global investment and lending program amounts to a debt trap for vulnerable countries around the world, fueling corruption and autocratic behavior in struggling democracies.
Evil Semp wrote:mrswdk wrote:It's sad really. China's approach to building relationships with other nations is to expend huge amounts of capital and energy helping them develop, while the default setting for America and its vassals is to treat international diplomacy as a game of king of the hill where they need to keep killing until they are the only ones left.
And you really think China is doing this without any gain for themselves.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/25/worl ... -port.html
Evil Semp wrote:The 2008 recession was a conspiracy by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to steal everyone's houses.
Evil Semp wrote:The military-industrial complex faked 9/11 to invade Afghanistan and grow heroin.
Evil Semp wrote:The Rothschilds funded the Holocaust so that they'd get their own country in the Middle East.
mrswdk wrote:It's sad really. China's approach to building relationships with other nations is to expend huge amounts of capital and energy helping them develop,...
mrswdk wrote:It's sad really. China's approach to building relationships with other nations is to expend huge amounts of capital and energy helping them develop, while the default setting for America and its vassals is to treat international diplomacy as a game of king of the hill where they need to keep killing until they are the only ones left.
riskllama wrote:a forced abortion is better than no abortion at all, pepe...
tzor wrote:All things considered and with the average average baby it's safer to give birth than to have an abortion
mrswdk wrote:tzor wrote:All things considered and with the average average baby it's safer to give birth than to have an abortion
What things did you consider in order to reach that conclusion?
tzor wrote:mrswdk wrote:tzor wrote:All things considered and with the average average baby it's safer to give birth than to have an abortion
What things did you consider in order to reach that conclusion?
Uterine wall perforation is the number one abortion complication in late term abortions. Most sources cite a 1/250 chance of this happening.
tzor wrote:riskllama wrote:a forced abortion is better than no abortion at all, pepe...
Actually ... no. All things considered and with the average average baby it's safer to give birth than to have an abortion, especially a "forced" one because if you are forcing someone against their wishes you probably don't really care for the patient either. It's just a quota.
tzor wrote:riskllama wrote:a forced abortion is better than no abortion at all, pepe...
Actually ... no. All things considered and with the average average baby it's safer to give birth than to have an abortion, especially a "forced" one because if you are forcing someone against their wishes you probably don't really care for the patient either. It's just a quota.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users