Moderator: Community Team
mrswdk wrote:This seems like a good thread to ask: are Burger Kings also relatively rare in the US (compared to McDonald's, KFC, Subway etc.)?
Just cause in the UK those franchises are much more common than Burger King, which seems odd when you consider how much better BK is.
Army of GOD wrote:mrswdk wrote:This seems like a good thread to ask: are Burger Kings also relatively rare in the US (compared to McDonald's, KFC, Subway etc.)?
Just cause in the UK those franchises are much more common than Burger King, which seems odd when you consider how much better BK is.
nah there are BKs all over the place.
mrswdk wrote:Army of GOD wrote:mrswdk wrote:This seems like a good thread to ask: are Burger Kings also relatively rare in the US (compared to McDonald's, KFC, Subway etc.)?
Just cause in the UK those franchises are much more common than Burger King, which seems odd when you consider how much better BK is.
nah there are BKs all over the place.
But are there as many BKs as there are McDonald's and KFCs?
pancakemix wrote:Quirk, you are a bastard. That is all.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
mrswdk wrote:BK’s burgers are better, fries are better, coke is hit and miss (sometimes they don’t add ice and it’s a bit warm).
Dukasaur wrote:mrswdk wrote:BK’s burgers are better, fries are better, coke is hit and miss (sometimes they don’t add ice and it’s a bit warm).
You're just saying they're better without any evidence whatsoever. The fries are the same cardboard julienne shit. The burgers are the same flavourless patty, although granted they do hide it differently.
In the Big Mac, the lack of flavour in the patty is concealed by a massive mound of shredded lettuce. In the Whopper, the lack of flavour in the patty is concealed by drowning it in a river of ketchup and mayo. So yeah, they do have a slightly different strategy for hiding the fact that the actual burger itself has no flavour whatsoever.
Evil Semp wrote:Dukasaur wrote:mrswdk wrote:BK’s burgers are better, fries are better, coke is hit and miss (sometimes they don’t add ice and it’s a bit warm).
You're just saying they're better without any evidence whatsoever. The fries are the same cardboard julienne shit. The burgers are the same flavourless patty, although granted they do hide it differently.
In the Big Mac, the lack of flavour in the patty is concealed by a massive mound of shredded lettuce. In the Whopper, the lack of flavour in the patty is concealed by drowning it in a river of ketchup and mayo. So yeah, they do have a slightly different strategy for hiding the fact that the actual burger itself has no flavour whatsoever.
I disagree with you. There is a taste difference. It depends on what you have a taste for. Me I like just the burger and the bun and depending on where I buy the some cheese.
mrswdk wrote:This seems like a good thread to ask: are Burger Kings also relatively rare in the US (compared to McDonald's, KFC, Subway etc.)?
mrswdk wrote:BK’s burgers are better, fries are better, coke is hit and miss (sometimes they don’t add ice and it’s a bit warm).
tzor wrote:There is a Old TV style BK near me, with BW television props, a set of tables that look like 50's notepads and Marilyn Monroe over that subway grate. I'd show you a photo, but you can't take photos in there.
Thorthoth wrote:Please... you can take a picture in a bloody Burger King.
pancakemix wrote:Quirk, you are a bastard. That is all.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
2dimes wrote:I wonder what Jones, Duke and anyone else who does not eat fast food would think of a place like In-n-out?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users