Conquer Club

what happened....
http://elections-o.channel.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/shark-pregnant-in-aquarium-with-no-males/20070625065909990001

whoa

You didn't know that? It's well established at this point that females can reproduce asexually.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18809674/

I thought this was common knowledge, guess not

DirtyDishSoap wrote:I thought this was common knowledge, guess not

no, I didnt know that at all......well now I look stupid *runs into corner and cries*

I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

MeDeFe wrote:I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

jnd94 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

unriggable wrote:

jnd94 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

in this one right here? Ya, he is a pretty good arguer. Again, I dont venture into political and or religious debates because I dont know enough to prove a point.

jnd94 wrote:

unriggable wrote:

jnd94 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

in this one right here? Ya, he is a pretty good arguer. Again, I dont venture into political and or religious debates because I dont know enough to prove a point.

As far as religion goes, you don't need proof for anything.

jnd94 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

I am smart enough to. But I'm to lazy to.

unriggable wrote:

jnd94 wrote:

unriggable wrote:

jnd94 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:I think we already had this in one of the debate threads about evolution vs. creationism. Don't you stay up to date on the ongoing discussions?

no, I dont read most of those threads becuase Im not smart enough to make a cohesive thought.

You do know who you're arguing against in that debate right?

in this one right here? Ya, he is a pretty good arguer. Again, I dont venture into political and or religious debates because I dont know enough to prove a point.

As far as religion goes, you don't need proof for anything.

Lawl, that's pretty true.

It would be way cooler if it turned out the shark mated outside her species. Can't wait for the DNA tests.

^^^^ I agree.