Conquer Club

show

show

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.

Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".

Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.

It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.

It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.

These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.

show

Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:

show

Boggles the fuckin mind.

mrswdk wrote:I give it maximum two weeks before waauw starts spamming OT with pepe frogs.

Skoffin wrote:Hams down it's the fat acceptance movement.

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.

Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".

Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.

It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.

It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.

These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.

show

Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:

show

Boggles the fuckin mind.

Bernie Sanders wrote:
The above post boggles the mind.



Too many young white guys are so upset that they are losing their WHITE PRIVILEGE.

Stop your whining and crying DDS or I might have to send you to bed. Grow a couple and for GODSAKE! stop your whimpering!

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Hard list to pick off of.

Activists are one thing, but these dorks scream and rave and try to shut other people down. There's no debating with them. Any opinion given is met with "You're a racist! You're a bigot! You hate women! You hate transgenders! You hate blah blah blah!".

Safe spaces is a joke. College is now a breeding ground for them. Where it was once a place to challenge thought, theory and promote rigorous thinking, and to actually have some semblance of a debate, is now turned into trigger warnings, safe spaces, and entitlement.

It's a joke. A sick joke. I'm not sure where it begun, or how, but I hope it dies off, or just flat out ignored across every corner of the globe.

It's a cancer. It's not even a movement. It's loud, obnoxious noise at unreasonable levels.

These people were some of the most influential men and women of their times.

show

Gone are those days. Now we're met with people like this:

show

Boggles the fuckin mind.

Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

mrswdk wrote:Churchill took food from India thereby starving tens of millions of people to death, because he thought it was more important that British people have the food.

mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017

>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017

mrswdk wrote:

DirtyDishSoap wrote:

mrswdk wrote:>cites incidents from the 1980s and 1990s, thinks those are still relevant in 2017

>cites incidents from 1940's, thinks it's still relevant in 2017

Symmetry brought up Churchill as an example of an anti-fascist and I expressed doubts about Churchill's integrity. Simmer down darling.

Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

tzor wrote:

Symmetry wrote:To people who dislike anti-fascists:

Churchill stood against everything the so called "anti-Fa" stands for. Just saying.

Most people do not understand where Fascism came from. (From the failed to materialize revolutions that Marxism had predicted.) They don't know how it evolved to "national" socialism as opposed to the "international - class based" socialism of Communism. They don't understand the tactics of fascists. As a result it isn't obvious to them that the anti-fa is in fact a Fascist organization (that can't even make the trains run on time).

Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence

Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.

In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.

mrswdk wrote:

Symmetry wrote:That's quite a claim, Tzor. That Churchill wasn't actually anti-fascist. I'm gonna need a little more evidence

Churchill as Home Secretary in 1910 was willing to use troops to support police who were protecting strike-breakers. The troops didn’t shoot anyone, but he had broken the existing understanding that there was one set of rules for mainland Britain and another for the British Empire (including Ireland). There had been breaches of this standard—Peterloo in 1819, and a handful of other incidents. But it was always a matter for protest, and the ruling class was always unhappy about taking things to such an extreme. But Churchill himself had small respect for existing rules when they got in his way.

In the 1920s, Churchill approved of Mussolini and Italian Fascism because he had been prepared to do much the same in Britain, if it had been necessary. He opposed Hitler as part of the same anti-German struggle that he had helped launch in 1914. It was only later that mainstream opinion chose to re-define the war as anti-Fascist, at a time when Germans were needed as Cold War allies.

https://gwydionwilliams.com/44-fascism- ... mussolini/