Moderator: Community Team
waauw wrote:Is the western world still too focused on and traumatized by WWII events that it still dictates current events? I read some articles from american right wing news instances and it seems that's the conclusion they come to. It might hold some merrit, what do you think?
Dukasaur wrote:waauw wrote:Is the western world still too focused on and traumatized by WWII events that it still dictates current events? I read some articles from american right wing news instances and it seems that's the conclusion they come to. It might hold some merrit, what do you think?
You know, when I was a kid, war was everything to me. I read every book about war in the school library. I memorized battle maps and ordnance statistics and orders of battle. There was a time when I could have told you the name of every German and British and American commander along the Rhine, the top speed and fuel capacity of every Russian and German tank, the muzzle velocity and flash signature of every Japanese naval gun, the ethnic composition of all the Imperial troops under Slim's command, etc., etc., etc. I used to do thing like write alternate histories where Singapore held out.
Then, around the middle of high school, I discovered sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll. War just faded into the background. Today I can't even remember 5% of that stuff. It's amazing how little I know or care about WWII now, when once it was the core of my existence.
I think that really is the answer. Once you have sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll, you realize how much of everything else is bullshit. The only reason we have wars at all is that there are poor benighted souls out there who don't get laid regularly, are too uptight to do drugs, and haven't discovered Emerson, Lake and Palmer.
Tell parliament to make love, not war.
Dukasaur wrote:waauw wrote:Is the western world still too focused on and traumatized by WWII events that it still dictates current events? I read some articles from american right wing news instances and it seems that's the conclusion they come to. It might hold some merrit, what do you think?
You know, when I was a kid, war was everything to me. I read every book about war in the school library. I memorized battle maps and ordnance statistics and orders of battle. There was a time when I could have told you the name of every German and British and American commander along the Rhine, the top speed and fuel capacity of every Russian and German tank, the muzzle velocity and flash signature of every Japanese naval gun, the ethnic composition of all the Imperial troops under Slim's command, etc., etc., etc. I used to do thing like write alternate histories where Singapore held out.
Then, around the middle of high school, I discovered sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll. War just faded into the background. Today I can't even remember 5% of that stuff. It's amazing how little I know or care about WWII now, when once it was the core of my existence.
I think that really is the answer. Once you have sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll, you realize how much of everything else is bullshit. The only reason we have wars at all is that there are poor benighted souls out there who don't get laid regularly, are too uptight to do drugs, and haven't discovered Emerson, Lake and Palmer.
Tell parliament to make love, not war.
mrswdk wrote:What current events are dictated by WWII?
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
waauw wrote:Is the western world still too focused on and traumatized by WWII events that it still dictates current events?
tzor wrote:waauw wrote:Is the western world still too focused on and traumatized by WWII events that it still dictates current events?
I grew up watching "Hogan's Heroes."![]()
Most people wouldn't know WWII if it came and slapped them on the bottom. What they know are the propaganda of the victors. This is why we obsess over the German Concentration Camps and ignore the Camps set up to contain American Citizens of Japan descent. This is why we obsess over the mass killings in those camps by the Germans but we never obsess over the mass killings and genocides of the Russians.
Everyone obsesses over the two nuclear bombs the United States dropped on Japan but forget the firebombing of Toyko killed more and damaged more. There are lots of complex things about the war that gets ignored. War is hell, and WWII is a good example of a big war. But tell that to the guys who suffered the hell of Korea, or the hell of Vietnam, or the hell of Iraq. Hell is hell.
mrswdk wrote:Okay yes, nuclear weapons were first used during WWII and have been banned ever since. The nuclear weapons ban isn't really a reaction to WWII per se though - more of a reaction to nuclear weapons themselves. Just like the current ban on chemical weapons isn't ever talked about in terms of their use during World War One.
An example of current events still being guided or shaped by historical conflicts would be something like the Korean peninsula still being the way it is as a direct result of the Korean War, or the Hong Kong-mainland China political tensions resulting from Hong Kong having been a British colony until recently. Beyond nuclear weapons, in what ways are current events in the 'Western world' heavily influenced by WWII?
mrswdk wrote:waauw spoke about people being so traumatized by WWII as to let it guide current events.
armati wrote:I skimmed this thread.
There are things that ww 2 affects today.
The root cause of them, as with pretty much every war from 1914 is economic, the wars are fought for banks, or more accurately the people that own the banks.
Most people would be surprised to find out who owns the federal reserve for example.
Heres a clue, the federal reserve was created in 1913, the first war began 1914.
There are events today that are a direct result of ww 2, not just nukes, but acts of terror among other things.
There was a german fellow named Otto Scorzeny, He was the Nazi super commando, (He rescued Mussolini for example) he worked with Amin al Husseni, when he met the top nazis this began things, a moslem division of the waffen ss was created.
Scorzeny also worked with Yasser Arafat (leader of the PLO) Muammar Gaddafi (lybia) and Saddam Hussein (iraq) and
Gamal Abdel Nasser (Egypt).
The attack from these people on the Jews is a direct result of the Balfour declaration (1917)
Hitler also transfered all Jews that wanted to gp, to Palistine from 1933 to 1941 under the Haavara Agreement or transfer agreement.
In any case, I believe due to these events Israel came up with the Yinon plan 1982. “Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
It is either these events or religious. Maybe both.
Now, the Americans have been following this Yinon plan ever since, Israel controls the U.S. through Aipac the Israeli lobby group. (connecting the dots is a bit much for this, especially as most people would see what Ive already written as rambling)
So, back to my point, Scorzeny was the guy that taught the Arab Muslims the ways of terror warfare.
Thus, this is one way we are directly affected from ww 2 today.
There are other ways we are directly affected, but I bet most people dont know what I just told ya all. lol
There are actually ALOT of secrets kept from ww2.
"History is a set of lies agreed upon.” Napoleon Bonaparte.
tzor wrote:mrswdk wrote:waauw spoke about people being so traumatized by WWII as to let it guide current events.
I don't think the "war" traumatized as much as the atomic bomb traumatized, it didn't cause trauma to the people but to the various military industrial complexes. The "Great" War (only with WWII was it called WWI) might have been the "war to end all wars" but it was the atomic bomb that ended all direct wars.
jusplay4fun wrote:Typical: mrswdk ignores my comments because he/she has NO answer because (s)he cannot deny my analysis or my comments
jusplay4fun wrote:Typical: mrswdk ignores my comments because he/she has NO answer because (s)he cannot deny my analysis or my comments
Bernie makes a cursory and vapid response which proves again his childish and limited mental ability.
Debate over; I win another one.
Move on. It is not obsession, but that the results of WWII still impacts modern day events, attitudes, and policy.
Look at this simply (mostly for Bernie): when nearly the entire war is at war (OK, South Am and Antarctica are barely impacted) then yes, that has long term impact. Even Nazis fleeing to South Am countries impact that continent....., Hmmm, maybe that is why it is call WORLD War 2.....ya think.....??
NAW, can't be, can it......?
JP
mrswdk wrote:Until the Korean War kicked off 5 years later.
With the end of the war with Japan, the Chinese Civil War resumed between the Communists and Nationalists. While the Communists were struggling for supremacy in Manchuria, they were supported by the North Korean government with matériel and manpower.[79] According to Chinese sources, the North Koreans donated 2,000 railway cars worth of supplies while thousands of Koreans served in the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) during the war.[80] North Korea also provided the Chinese Communists in Manchuria with a safe refuge for non-combatants and communications with the rest of China.[79]
Stalin initially did not think the time was right for a war in Korea. Chinese Communist forces were still embroiled in the Chinese Civil War, while U.S. forces remained stationed in South Korea.[90] By spring 1950, he believed that the strategic situation had changed: Mao's Communist forces had secured final victory in China, U.S. forces had withdrawn from Korea, and the Soviets detonated their first nuclear bomb, breaking the U.S. atomic monopoly. As the U.S. had not directly intervened to stop the communist victory in China, Stalin calculated that they would be even less willing to fight in Korea, which had much less strategic significance. The Soviets had also cracked the codes used by the U.S. to communicate with their embassy in Moscow, and reading these dispatches convinced Stalin that Korea did not have the importance to the US that would warrant a nuclear confrontation.[91]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users