Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:50 pmDid you remember?
I see no reason why it should ever be forgot.
I see no reason why it should ever be forgot.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
Re: Re: Member 5/11
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=220520
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 9:50 pmRe: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:02 pmRe: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:20 amI barely recall last week, let alone back in May.
-TG
-TG
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:18 pmTA1LGUNN3R wrote:I barely recall last week, let alone back in May.
-TG
Urgh, Americans and their nonsense dating system.
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:54 pmSymmetry wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I barely recall last week, let alone back in May.
-TG
Urgh, Americans and their nonsense dating system.
Just like the Brits with backwards cricket scores
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:57 pmWe should date things like this:
2016 11 5.
2016 11 5.
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2016 11:13 pmTeeGee wrote:Symmetry wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I barely recall last week, let alone back in May.
-TG
Urgh, Americans and their nonsense dating system.
Just like the Brits with backwards cricket scores
That's just an outright category error. Dd/Mm/Yy makes sense to anyone. Cricket scores aren't supposed to make sense.
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 12:04 amhttp://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html
It's an international standard and, as if that wasn't enough, it's a computer standard. You'll burn in hell for this one Symmetry.
It's an international standard and, as if that wasn't enough, it's a computer standard. You'll burn in hell for this one Symmetry.
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:57 amSymmetry wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I barely recall last week, let alone back in May.
-TG
Urgh, Americans and their nonsense dating system.
If that were true, why don't you notate your time similarly, ie secs:min:hr? You don't, because nobody says it like that. Nobody says "Today is 7 November."
-TG
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:00 amTA1LGUNN3R wrote:Symmetry wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I barely recall last week, let alone back in May.
-TG
Urgh, Americans and their nonsense dating system.
If that were true, why don't you notate your time similarly, ie secs:min:hr? You don't, because nobody says it like that. Nobody says "Today is 7 November."
-TG
The French do, proving they are terrorists.
Re: Re: Member 5/11
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:10 pmTA1LGUNN3R wrote:Symmetry wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I barely recall last week, let alone back in May.
-TG
Urgh, Americans and their nonsense dating system.
If that were true, why don't you notate your time similarly, ie secs:min:hr? You don't, because nobody says it like that. Nobody says "Today is 7 November."
-TG
Thankfully, the US government has the sense to get it the right way round.
Time is kind of interesting. Why do Americans often say "quarter of" when they try to use the English term "quarter to"? It seems to be a fairly common mistake, and I can only assume it's due to some kind of flaw in the education system across the pond.