Page 1 of 1

Thank God for Prudes

PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:35 am
by tzor
Because otherwise I would have missed this wonderful article ... No Bra And A Sheer Dress — We Did Not Need To See All Of That, Kim Kardashian (NSFW? Only if you have prudes at work I suppose.)

Now if I want to nit pick, I might wonder if the dress works with the boots, but since she seems to pull it off, I'll defer that one.
You can see the shadow of the nipples through the dress. SO WHAT?
I don't follow the Kardashians. I will never follow the Kardashians. But if that is what people are complaining about these days ... get a life!

Still, the boots should have been tighter ... just saying.

Re: Thank God for Prudes

PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:50 am
by mrswdk
If you're into that sort of thing then you'd probably like the Daily Mail.

Re: Thank God for Prudes

PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:26 pm
by Bernie Sanders
I would follow Kim, like the dog I am.

Re: Thank God for Prudes

PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:33 pm
by TA1LGUNN3R
I might care if she wasn't composed solely of plastic and cosmetics by now. At what point does she just admit she's an exhibitionist?

-TG

Re: Thank God for Prudes

PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:33 pm
by Symmetry
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I might care if she wasn't composed solely of plastic and cosmetics by now. At what point does she just admit she's an exhibitionist?

-TG


Probably when she puts publishes footage of an endroscopy. We've seen everything else.