Conquer Club

I'm thinking by around 2052.

When the voters "make America great again".

have you met mrswdk yet, asylum?

riskllama wrote:have you met mrswdk yet, asylum?

Unfortunately I have. I assume he wants it legalised.

Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

That has never stopped Phatts into turning everything into us vs THEM. Now that Trump has taken over the Republican Party and proves to the Republican Party that people aren't as conservative as it thought they were, but are just a bunch of racists and bigots.

Phatts is lost and now has to rethink his positions to realign himself with the new GOP!

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

Oops. I was thinking of incest being totes kewl in many advanced evolved European countries. At least that was the addendum though and not the actual ruling so totes kewl totes. However parents can marry their children in at least a few European countries which neatly one-ups the pedophilia aspect so this is kinda like the mystery chunk missing from the moon. It does in fact look like a chunk is missing, but really there isn't.

My bad yo

Bernie Sanders wrote:

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

That has never stopped Phatts into turning everything into us vs THEM. Now that Trump has taken over the Republican Party and proves to the Republican Party that people aren't as conservative as it thought they were, but are just a bunch of racists and bigots.

Phatts is lost and now has to rethink his positions to realign himself with the new GOP!

<---Phats "topic topic topic topic topic'
--->Bernie "Phats Phats Phats Phats Phats'

thanks for playing, better luck next time

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

Not really. All European states (as far as I'm aware) allow sexual activity with children under the age of 18, they just tend to draw the line somewhere in the mid- to late-teens rather than out-and-out legalizing it for all children.

Then again, the same is true in a lot of American states and has been for some time, so I think Phats has rather missed the boat with this one.

mrswdk wrote:

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

Not really. All European states (as far as I'm aware) allow sexual activity with children under the age of 18, they just tend to draw the line somewhere in the mid- to late-teens rather than out-and-out legalizing it for all children.

Then again, the same is true in a lot of American states and has been for some time, so I think Phats has rather missed the boat with this one.

Besides your post indicating Pedophilia is so okay that it's not a big deal anymore, I've been puzzled by your approach on this one and note you have been doing a little steering. But I think I figured it out on my third scenario of pertinent thoughts. I remember you had been typecast as mr pedophilia and it even haunted you a bit. You got sick of it and are now starting to give in and that has led to you carpetbagging issues unto me.

I couldn't care less if OT's more regressive voices disagree with me on this. Socially conservative types once fought the legalization of homosexuality quite fiercely as well, and look where that got them.

With that last comment I was just pointing out that 'pedophilia' is legal in quite a lot of US states as well as European ones.

mrswdk wrote:I couldn't care less if OT's more regressive voices disagree with me on this. Socially conservative types once fought the legalization of homosexuality quite fiercely as well, and look where that got them.

With that last comment I was just pointing out that 'pedophilia' is legal in quite a lot of US states as well as European ones.

well, looks where Democrat types once fought for legalization of slavery and against America/for the Confederacy. Looking where that got them.... using the lens of your choosing and in the same context, I might conclude your point is that over the long term 90-95% of homosexuals will vote Republican???

LONG LIVE THE LOG CABINS!

Phatscotty wrote:

mrswdk wrote:I couldn't care less if OT's more regressive voices disagree with me on this. Socially conservative types once fought the legalization of homosexuality quite fiercely as well, and look where that got them.

With that last comment I was just pointing out that 'pedophilia' is legal in quite a lot of US states as well as European ones.

well, looks where Democrat types once fought for legalization of slavery and against America/for the Confederacy. Looking where that got them.... using the lens of your choosing and in the same context, I might conclude your point is that over the long term 90-95% of homosexuals will vote Republican???

LONG LIVE THE LOG CABINS!

Democrat vs Republican? I think you have me confused with someone else.

Phatscotty wrote:

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

Oops. I was thinking of incest being totes kewl in many advanced evolved European countries. At least that was the addendum though and not the actual ruling so totes kewl totes. However parents can marry their children in at least a few European countries which neatly one-ups the pedophilia aspect so this is kinda like the mystery chunk missing from the moon. It does in fact look like a chunk is missing, but really there isn't.

My bad yo

please name just 1 country (in the entire world) in which marring your child is legal.
I hope you were joking... If you're not, stop watching fox news and speaking out of your ass.

mrswdk wrote:

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

Not really. All European states (as far as I'm aware) allow sexual activity with children under the age of 18, they just tend to draw the line somewhere in the mid- to late-teens rather than out-and-out legalizing it for all children.

Then again, the same is true in a lot of American states and has been for some time, so I think Phats has rather missed the boat with this one.

lol... WTF are you talking about? seriously you are mentally disturbed.

betiko wrote:

mrswdk wrote:

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

Not really. All European states (as far as I'm aware) allow sexual activity with children under the age of 18, they just tend to draw the line somewhere in the mid- to late-teens rather than out-and-out legalizing it for all children.

Then again, the same is true in a lot of American states and has been for some time, so I think Phats has rather missed the boat with this one.

lol... WTF are you talking about? seriously you are mentally disturbed.

To take a couple of examples: in the UK and the Netherlands it is legally permissible for adults aged 18+ to have sexual relations with children aged 16 or 17. I imagine the legal systems of a large number of other European states also allow for legal minors and legal adults to engage in sexual relations in this way. Hence my point about drawing the line somewhere in the mid- to late-teens.

So the point I made was correct, and your response was hasty and ill-considered.

well it depends on the case, like if you have a couple between a 20yo and a 17yo for example, it's not the same thing that if they are 60 and 17.

In france, the sexual majority is at 16 yo, even if it can be considered a felony for an 18+ to f*ck with a 16-18yo... kind of depending on the case.
For example, before the world cup 2010 there was a sex scandal in france because 3 football players from the national team fucked a 17yo hooker. They went to trial and had to prove that they were tricked by the hooker. But that is just ridiculous... they were 20 to 23 fucking a 17yo... that's just almost the same age. No big charges were pressed against them.

by the way... stop calling teenagers childs. There is a big difference between a 8yo and a 16yo, mostly when it comes to sex.

I know that in france the appearance has a lot to do. Like if some guy has sex with a 15yo that told him she was 19... and that the girl looks really older and tricked him, there are good chances nothing will happen... and I think it's normal.

betiko wrote:well it depends on the case, like if you have a couple between a 20yo and a 17yo for example, it's not the same thing that if they are 60 and 17.

In both those cases it's still pedophilia on the part of the legal adult.

by the way... stop calling teenagers childs. There is a big difference between a 8yo and a 16yo, mostly when it comes to sex.

In most countries, someone aged 0-17 is a child and 18+ is an adult.

There are a few exceptions (e.g. in Middle Eastern countries the cut-off ages range between 15 and 21), but in the vast majority of countries (including France) anyone under the age of 18 is a child.

I know that in france the appearance has a lot to do. Like if some guy has sex with a 15yo that told him she was 19... and that the girl looks really older and tricked him, there are good chances nothing will happen... and I think it's normal.

I was not aware that in France it is considered normal for pedophiles to escape conviction for having sex with minors by claiming they thought the girl was an adult, but I defer to your greater level of knowledge when it comes to these things.

mrswdk wrote:

betiko wrote:well it depends on the case, like if you have a couple between a 20yo and a 17yo for example, it's not the same thing that if they are 60 and 17.

In both those cases it's still pedophilia on the part of the legal adult.

by the way... stop calling teenagers childs. There is a big difference between a 8yo and a 16yo, mostly when it comes to sex.

In most countries, someone aged 0-17 is a child and 18+ is an adult.

There are a few exceptions (e.g. in Middle Eastern countries the cut-off ages range between 15 and 21), but in the vast majority of countries (including France) anyone under the age of 18 is a child.

stop being ridiculous. An 8yo would never decide to have sex. A pubert would.. which would be around 13yo. By 16yo I guess half of the world population has had consentual sex with someone roughly their age. If a 17 years old has sex with a 14yo it's ok, but if they are still together 1 year later... and it's a 18yo with a 15yo it's a pedophile?

betiko wrote:

mrswdk wrote:

betiko wrote:well it depends on the case, like if you have a couple between a 20yo and a 17yo for example, it's not the same thing that if they are 60 and 17.

In both those cases it's still pedophilia on the part of the legal adult.

by the way... stop calling teenagers childs. There is a big difference between a 8yo and a 16yo, mostly when it comes to sex.

In most countries, someone aged 0-17 is a child and 18+ is an adult.

There are a few exceptions (e.g. in Middle Eastern countries the cut-off ages range between 15 and 21), but in the vast majority of countries (including France) anyone under the age of 18 is a child.

stop being ridiculous. An 8yo would never decide to have sex. A pubert would.. which would be around 13yo. By 16yo I guess half of the world population has had consentual sex with someone roughly their age. If a 17 years old has sex with a 14yo it's ok, but if they are still together 1 year later... and it's a 18yo with a 15yo it's a pedophile?

I agree that a lot of laws are highly arbitrary.

well, they are mostly in the US where there are not too many shades of grey.
And when you see what some states like florida do to sex offenders... it's pretty fucking ridiculous. This could go from a big time dangerous kid predator to a guy who fucked his girlfriend a few month younger and the father called the police.

It doesn't sound like there are very many shades of grey in France either, if the only way a 19 or 20 year-old can have sex with a 16 or 17 year-old is to convince a court of law that they were deceived into thinking the other person was a legal adult.

Maybe it's a bit pedodantic, but I don't think there's actually anywhere where pedophilia is illegal. Statutory rape is illegal, child pornography is illegal, sexual molestation is illegal, but pedophilia itself doesn't necessarily involve any actions by definition.

mrswdk wrote:

waauw wrote:

Phatscotty wrote:Just as simply as the first time love was redefined via marriage rights based on tax codes, as soon as a single un-elected lifetime appointed state supreme court judge from a single state feels like coming out of the closet as a pedophile that refuses to be discriminated against any longer overturns a democratically derived Constitutional amendment by ruling...

"Love is a universally fundamental human right; therefore everyone who is under 18 is being discriminated against.'

in addendum - 'There are already some far more evolved European countries that are and have been allowing ALL it's citizens to exercise their right to love'

In short, a universal human right does not kick in only on a human beings 18th birthday, and the government should be granting and respecting human rights equally.

Anything that can be redefined can and should expect to be redefined again.

Hey champ, as far as I know paedophilia is forbidden everywhere in europe as well.

Not really. All European states (as far as I'm aware) allow sexual activity with children under the age of 18, they just tend to draw the line somewhere in the mid- to late-teens rather than out-and-out legalizing it for all children.

Then again, the same is true in a lot of American states and has been for some time, so I think Phats has rather missed the boat with this one.

There is a difference: pedophilia as a term refers to sex with pre-puberty kids. Most european countries set the age of consent somewhere in their teens. Technically this isn't pedophilia. That's how it is in most of the world.


shades of blue(light to dark): 13-16
shades of green(light to dark): 17-19
pink: must be married