jgordon1111 wrote:
Got nothing against the flag, and would agree on freedom of speech, what I was pointing to is his sign out, that was over and done with a long time ago, promoting it today is abhorrent, and promotes further division among people Caucasian and everyone else. So tell me if I am misunderstanding his message!
What do you mean by "his sign out"? Are you talking about his avatar or his screen name? Or his "The Blue and Silver Rebellion" at the end of his posts?
Because if it's any of those then then it's still free speech and as long as he's not violating the rules of the site (a private entity that can decide what is and isn't allowed). One is either for freedom of speech or against it, no matter how offensive one might find such speech.
Freedom of speech isn't about protecting popular speech, it's about protecting controversial speech. If Confederate SS wants to pay homage to the confederate rebellion, more power to him. Making him get rid of his name or image or speech at the end of his posts doesn't promote cooperation. It's not like that will change his mind unless you prefer fake cooperation which is all you'd be doing.
His sign off shows what he believes in, if you make him stop using it then people won't know. He'll still have the same beliefs, the same reverence and anyone looking at his speech and avatar instantly knows and can decide for themselves what they want to think. But if you hide all that from people then what do you have? He's still the same person but the queues that were present are gone and so he just becomes hidden. By driving speech that you don't like away you don't get rid of it, you merely drive it underground. And that certain doesn't help either.
I'm all for people saying whatever. At least then you see what they are right away, for better or worse. Full disclosure if you will. The more extreme the better because it shows everyone what the ideas are and people have better information upon which to decide for themselves what to think. The more vile the speech the more sure one knows to reject an individual or organization or idea.
I don't have any problem with his point, I kinda agree with it. It was nuts the hysteria over the confederate flag is/was. I don't particularly agree with armed rebellion too often, and certainly not the institution of slavery, but trying to make people hide what they believe in merely moves people into the shadows, it doesn't get rid of the beliefs. And from the shadows is where the danger comes and is most unexpected. Danger in front of your face can be seen and planned for, danger you can't see is far graver. IMO.