Conquer Club

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

tzor wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

They used CC Coins. They work like the CC Defending Dice.

Besides, the Sanders should have objected to the rules, "Heads I win; tails you loose."

mrswdk wrote:(the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses)

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

jimboston wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics.

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

BTW... the caucus and primary system in the US are not officially part of the Constitution. There are simply a ridiculous public vetting of private party candidates. The Parties aren't part of the Constitution either. Private groups have every right to decide how to select their candidates. They don't have to abide by or pay attention to the caucuses or primaries. So who "wins" shouldn't really matter.

notyou2 wrote:

jimboston wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics.

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

BTW... the caucus and primary system in the US are not officially part of the Constitution. There are simply a ridiculous public vetting of private party candidates. The Parties aren't part of the Constitution either. Private groups have every right to decide how to select their candidates. They don't have to abide by or pay attention to the caucuses or primaries. So who "wins" shouldn't really matter.

Jim, are you really that dumb? Do you not know what your country does around the world? The influence it has? The interference it performs? Your government is a bully at the behest of the american people/big business who are also bullies. The election effects us all. We the peoples of the world have every right to discuss it. Too bad we couldn't influence it more.

notyou2 wrote:

jimboston wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics.

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

BTW... the caucus and primary system in the US are not officially part of the Constitution. There are simply a ridiculous public vetting of private party candidates. The Parties aren't part of the Constitution either. Private groups have every right to decide how to select their candidates. They don't have to abide by or pay attention to the caucuses or primaries. So who "wins" shouldn't really matter.

Jim, are you really that dumb? Do you not know what your country does around the world? The influence it has? The interference it performs? Your government is a bully at the behest of the american people/big business who are also bullies. The election effects us all. We the peoples of the world have every right to discuss it. Too bad we couldn't influence it more.

jimboston wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

mrswdk wrote:

jimboston wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

Erm, yeah. What notyou2 said. Do you think that the consequences of the US election will only be felt within the US?

mrswdk wrote:

jimboston wrote:

mrswdk wrote:Mrs Bill Clinton beats Bernie Sanders, winning 6 coin tosses to gain two more representatives than he did.

Had they each won half of the tosses (the most likely outcome of 6 coin tosses), Bernie would have won Iowa.

The Establishment strikes again！！

In a previous thread you said you don't "bash the US" except when US interferes in asian affairs.
(paraphrasing)

Yet here you are creating a thread about the machinations of internal US politics

Please tell me why this is your business if you are a Chinese person living in the UK.

Erm, yeah. What notyou2 said. Do you think that the consequences of the US election will only be felt within the US?