Flooded Kingdoms of the Ice Age

[Phatscotty]

2 cities the size of Manhattan found over 120 feet under the ocean off the East coast of India

Part 1


Part 2

[Bernie Sanders]

OH NO, NOT ANOTHER FLOOD THREAD!

The dikes are holding!

[notyou2]

You spelled dykes wrong.

[Bernie Sanders]

You spelled dykes wrong.

Was trying to be PC

[PLAYER57832]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

[Phatscotty]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

[Bernie Sanders]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

These so-called cities were not cities, that have been shown on TV programs like History Channel and Discovery Channel. They were basically rock formation that were formed by currents.

Sure there was villages and settlements that were scattered through out the world, during times of the Ice Age where land was extended to the Continental Shelves.

Nothing to see here, move on.

[waauw]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

These so-called cities were not cities, that have been shown on TV programs like History Channel and Discovery Channel. They were basically rock formation that were formed by currents.

Sure there was villages and settlements that were scattered through out the world, during times of the Ice Age where land was extended to the Continental Shelves.

Nothing to see here, move on.

Don't worry. We don't blame you for not seeing the difference between a rock formation and man-made formations. It's difficult for people your age to still learn.
As long as you don't get behind the wheel again, all is cool.

[tzor]

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

It would help if you gave specific examples. One of the obvious is that the water came in. There were lots of cities built below sea level that never saw water until the water came because of shifting land mass. It could also be located on a sandy shore and it slipped into the sea. Earthquakes can shift a land up or down. OUR WORLD 10 Mysterious Underwater Cities You Haven’t Heard Of

[Bernie Sanders]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

These so-called cities were not cities, that have been shown on TV programs like History Channel and Discovery Channel. They were basically rock formation that were formed by currents.

Sure there was villages and settlements that were scattered through out the world, during times of the Ice Age where land was extended to the Continental Shelves.

Nothing to see here, move on.

Don't worry. We don't blame you for not seeing the difference between a rock formation and man-made formations. It's difficult for people your age to still learn.
As long as you don't get behind the wheel again, all is cool.

Thank you for your concerns about me driving....

[waauw]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

These so-called cities were not cities, that have been shown on TV programs like History Channel and Discovery Channel. They were basically rock formation that were formed by currents.

Sure there was villages and settlements that were scattered through out the world, during times of the Ice Age where land was extended to the Continental Shelves.

Nothing to see here, move on.

Don't worry. We don't blame you for not seeing the difference between a rock formation and man-made formations. It's difficult for people your age to still learn.
As long as you don't get behind the wheel again, all is cool.

Thank you for your concerns about me driving....

No problem. I noticed you running over Hillary Clinton in Iowa and New Hampshire.

[Bernie Sanders]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

These so-called cities were not cities, that have been shown on TV programs like History Channel and Discovery Channel. They were basically rock formation that were formed by currents.

Sure there was villages and settlements that were scattered through out the world, during times of the Ice Age where land was extended to the Continental Shelves.

Nothing to see here, move on.

Don't worry. We don't blame you for not seeing the difference between a rock formation and man-made formations. It's difficult for people your age to still learn.
As long as you don't get behind the wheel again, all is cool.

Thank you for your concerns about me driving....

No problem. I noticed you running over Hillary Clinton in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Hillary spent the other day in Philadelphia, soaking up money from investment bankers. Thank GOD! she can't be bought.

[PLAYER57832]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

The reason varies. Most broadly, the lands sunk. In some cases, oceans rose or obscructions were removed. In a few cases, it has directly to do with human intervention, similar to what we are seeing now -- loss of protecting trees, etc.

Like I said, you have to be specific.

You want to claim there is some huge, secret, overreaching cause for all of it. I can say that is not the case (for one thing,the dates largely differ, though there are some coincidences), but without your specifics, its hard to know exactly which erroneous theory you are believing. Without the specifics, its hard to refute your claims, pretty easy for you to set back and say "nah.. you just don't get it". You are right, I don't "get" your ideas.

I do, however, get that global climate change is pretty real, and that saying we don't have to worry about it is like saying "don't worry about vaccinations, it won't help in a car crash". We need vaccinations AND seatbelts, both!

[warmonger1981]

I hope you see the climate changing. Earths climate has been changing since its inception. I hope you're up on all your vaccines recommended by the government.If you follow the CDC's recommended vaccination schedule your child will receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines by the time he/she is 6 years of age.

And by the age of 18, the CDC recommends that children should have gotten 69 doses of 16 vaccines.

[Dukasaur]

I hope you see the climate changing. Earths climate has been changing since its inception. I hope you're up on all your vaccines recommended by the government.If you follow the CDC's recommended vaccination schedule your child will receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines by the time he/she is 6 years of age.

And by the age of 18, the CDC recommends that children should have gotten 69 doses of 16 vaccines.

When's the last time your kid got polio?

[macbone]

It's Atlantis! Awesome!!

[warmonger1981]

Did you and your kids get all 69 doses of 16 types of vaccines?

[Dukasaur]

Did you and your kids get all 69 doses of 16 types of vaccines?

Very unlikely. Been a long time since I was a kid, and even my kids aren't kids any more, so it's quite likely that more vaccines have been added to the list since then.

[Edit: checks list for examples.]
I see they're now vaccinating for measles. In my day that wasn't done. We just got measles. For most kids, it was no big deal, but some developed serious complications, and in rare cases they died. I'm sure at least some of my friends at school wished there had been a measles vaccine back in the day. My measles outbreak came just before summer vacation, and while I didn't mind missing the last two weeks of school, I almost missed a trip to Europe that year.

I see they're now vaccinating for invasive meningococcus. Invasive meningococcus is fatal in about 15% of cases and and causes permanent brain damage in others. There was an IMC outbreak in our town when my kids were small, and they had a serious flu at the time, with some of the symptoms of meningococcus. I remember the sense of absolute terror of knowing that's what it might be. Luckily, no it wasn't, but the days I spent tormented by fear are days I'll never get back. If there had been an IMC vaccine back then, you're damn right my kids would have gotten it.

[notyou2]

I hope you see the climate changing. Earths climate has been changing since its inception. I hope you're up on all your vaccines recommended by the government.If you follow the CDC's recommended vaccination schedule your child will receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines by the time he/she is 6 years of age.

And by the age of 18, the CDC recommends that children should have gotten 69 doses of 16 vaccines.

If you are one of those anti-vaxers I'm happy.

Your genes won't be passed on.

Anti-vaxers....natures way of saying "Hey you! Out of the gene pool!"

[PLAYER57832]

There is plenty of evidence of cities now covered by the ocean, etc. What is your point Phatt?

I'd much rather walk you through using your own words, since the title of the thread is obviously escaping you.

My point is, Player, how did the cities get underwater?

When was the last time those cities were above ground and not underwater?

These so-called cities were not cities, that have been shown on TV programs like History Channel and Discovery Channel. They were basically rock formation that were formed by currents.

That is true in some cases, but in other cases there actually are real remains of cities. I asked Phattscotty to clarify because without knowing which specific points he was talking about, it is impossible to clarify.

But Phattscotty, as usual has no interest in that. Its much easier to claim conspiracies when there are few specifics.

[PLAYER57832]

I hope you see the climate changing. Earths climate has been changing since its inception. I hope you're up on all your vaccines recommended by the government.If you follow the CDC's recommended vaccination schedule your child will receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines by the time he/she is 6 years of age.

And by the age of 18, the CDC recommends that children should have gotten 69 doses of 16 vaccines.

Yes, and as a result YOUR kids don't have to worry about small pox, mumps, whooping cough, measles..... OOOPS seems too many have decided they know better than medical science and now these diseases ARE COMING BACK.

Yeah.. real smart. Vaccines kill 1 in 100,000 or so, but measles kills 1 in 1000 directly, leads to pneumonia which kills many more, results in blindness, deafness, etc, etc, etc.

Try looking at the REAL facts instead of junk science. You know its not some remote entity called "government" filled with guys in backrooms wearing suits that pushed for these rules, its our grandparents, their doctors who saw their classmates and relatives dying, suffering from these diseases that celebrated when vaccines were invented. THEY pushed to make these vaccines required because a few standouts ENDANGERED the health and welfare of everyone. In the old days, households with things like measles were put under mandatory quarantine. Maybe everyone who decides its sensible to not vaccinate should all be quarantined... except the rest of us would still not be safe, because most of these pathogens are carried in the air.

[warmonger1981]

I'm not Anti vaccine. I like more of a natural way of doing things. I believe in a type of natural law. It's when humans go against nature is when natures balance is thrown out of order. So I let nature do its thing and you go against nature and f*ck up its natural balance. Maybe that's why there is so called climate change. Too many people creating new diseases.

Player do you know what I've read and if its junk science?? You seem to jump too quickly. Unless your up on all the vaccines I will suggest your either Anti vaccine or you're not very responsible. Pick one.

[tzor]

Yes, and as a result YOUR kids don't have to worry about small pox, mumps, whooping cough, measles..... OOOPS seems too many have decided they know better than medical science and now these diseases ARE COMING BACK.

First of all, I would never recommend an "all or nothing" attitude. Vaccines are very important. However we may need to "rethink" our attitude towards them. Vaccines effectively play with our immune system, and as we have seen with studies of the use of air conditioned and filtered environments and allergies, the immune system is complex and needs to be "exercised" frequently. Perhaps the entire regimine needs to be reconsidered. Perhaps some of the vaccines need to be bumped up a little higher to better engage the immune system more. I really think we need to collect all the data and throw it through Watson for analysis. We might wind up improving the system.

[PLAYER57832]

Yes, and as a result YOUR kids don't have to worry about small pox, mumps, whooping cough, measles..... OOOPS seems too many have decided they know better than medical science and now these diseases ARE COMING BACK.

First of all, I would never recommend an "all or nothing" attitude. Vaccines are very important. However we may need to "rethink" our attitude towards them. Vaccines effectively play with our immune system, and as we have seen with studies of the use of air conditioned and filtered environments and allergies, the immune system is complex and needs to be "exercised" frequently. Perhaps the entire regimine needs to be reconsidered. Perhaps some of the vaccines need to be bumped up a little higher to better engage the immune system more. I really think we need to collect all the data and throw it through Watson for analysis. We might wind up improving the system.

There is nothing wrong with investigations.