Violent Extremism
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:03 pmWhat does this mean?
DaGip wrote:What does this mean?
Not all extremism is violent.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/
Violent Extremism
http://www.tools.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=215686
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:03 pmRe: Violent Extremism
Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 11:46 pmNot all extremism is violent.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 12:04 amAmerica is facing economic and class warfare/terrorism by the very rich.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:43 pmBernie Sanders wrote:America is facing economic and class warfare/terrorism by the very rich.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:55 pmand that children, is why the west hates communism(the good russian kind, not the lame chinese variant).
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:50 amriskllama wrote:and that children, is why the west hates communism(the good russian kind, not the lame chinese variant).
See... I think Communism on a theoretical scale sounds nice. But its not practical. China is a great example. As well as the USSR. It ultimately fails because those in Power will not easily give power up. Also Doesn't work because of other issues caused by red tape and state run businesses. You may disagree with me but in the DDR it took sometimes 10 yrs to get a car. If a company told its customers that here, they'd go out of business.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:54 amThe reason Mao's communism failed was not because Mao did not arrange for power to rotate between himself and other leaders, or between the Communist Party and other parties. It failed because, for the large part, central planning and state-owned companies suck balls.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:05 ammrswdk wrote:The reason Mao's communism failed was not because Mao did not arrange for power to rotate between himself and other leaders, or between the Communist Party and other parties. It failed because, for the large part, central planning and state-owned companies suck balls.
The above statement makes absolutely no sense.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:08 amBernie Sanders wrote:mrswdk wrote:The reason Mao's communism failed was not because Mao did not arrange for power to rotate between himself and other leaders, or between the Communist Party and other parties. It failed because, for the large part, central planning and state-owned companies suck balls.
The above statement make absolutely no sense.
On the contrary, it actually makes a lot of sense.
Democracy is a desirable goal for most people, but it is ultimately a luxury good. Plenty of undemocratic societies work just fine. Mr. Swickdick is right: it is the economic aspects of Communism, not its political aspects, that ultimately caused it to fail.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:22 pmDukasaur wrote:Bernie Sanders wrote:mrswdk wrote:The reason Mao's communism failed was not because Mao did not arrange for power to rotate between himself and other leaders, or between the Communist Party and other parties. It failed because, for the large part, central planning and state-owned companies suck balls.
The above statement make absolutely no sense.
On the contrary, it actually makes a lot of sense.
Democracy is a desirable goal for most people, but it is ultimately a luxury good. Plenty of undemocratic societies work just fine. Mr. Swickdick is right: it is the economic aspects of Communism, not its political aspects, that ultimately caused it to fail.
As stated in my previous post, I'll agree with that last statement. Central Planning and Stateowned companies are usually horrific. Its led to the rise of the zombie Steel industry in China.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:24 pmOnce again, Bernie awakes from his nap confused and angry and forgets to engage his brain before he starts speaking.
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:34 pmWoodruff wrote:DaGip wrote:What does this mean?
Not all extremism is violent.
good point, but violent extremism is violent
Re: Violent Extremism
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 2:01 pmChinese steel is garbage...