Page 1 of 2
Whats Better?

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:19 am
by DirtyDishSoap
Star Wars or LOTR? (Lord of the Rings)

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:20 am
by Aries
I think LoTR, but they're both good series


Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:26 am
by Aegnor
LOTR was a nice trilogy, but the original Star Wars trilogy is a true classic.

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:27 am
by paranoid-android
i truly do not care


Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:29 am
by Aegnor
paranoid-android wrote:i truly do not care

Waste of bandwidth.

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:29 am
by alex_white101
sex

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:30 am
by paranoid-android
i'm in ur tubez, eatin' your bandwidth.

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:41 am
by Aegnor
alex_white101 wrote:sex
Sex seldom lasts as long as a feature. However, I'm not saying that it couldn't be better in this case


Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:54 am
by Titanic
LotR all the way!

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:56 am
by KomradeKloininov
It depends. If you include the new Star Wars movies aswell as the original, then LoTR, otherwise the original Star Wars movies take the bacon.

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:57 am
by mr. incrediball
Titanic wrote:LotR all the way!
you sicken me...


Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 10:58 am
by paranoid-android
Aegnor wrote:alex_white101 wrote:sex
Sex seldom lasts as long as a feature. However, I'm not saying that it couldn't be better in this case

QFT

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 11:53 am
by DirtyDishSoap
KomradeKloininov wrote:It depends. If you include the new Star Wars movies aswell as the original, then LoTR, otherwise the original Star Wars movies take the bacon.
I mean Star Wars in General
(I also mean all the freaking books for LOTR)

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 12:40 pm
by KomradeKloininov
Okay, I see. Then , LoTR because the books are excellent and I spent most of Episode 3 laughing myself silly.

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 12:41 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
2nd Triology was horrible...Made me gag

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 12:41 pm
by johnnyrotten
What's better: AIDS or leprosy?

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 12:42 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
AIDs sounds pretty good

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 1:56 pm
by jay_a2j
Star Wars

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 2:08 pm
by Chad22342
George Lucas had a great start but then he became corrupted with all of the things going on with the world today and made the others like one of those cheesy star wars books(which totally suck by the way). Peter Jackson, on the other hand, knew what had to be done and what a good movie requires which Goerge Lucas must have forgotten..

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 5:18 pm
by paranoid-android
i'll take a good old case of NEITHER thank you. (for the leprosy/aids thing)

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 6:22 pm
by safariguy5
I think you are comparing apples and oranges here. LOTR is a fantasy genre movie set in a medieval timeline with the existence of magic. Star Wars is a Science Fiction Genre movie set in a space timeline with the existence of highly developed technology. Now if you compared Star Wars to Star Trek and LOTR to say, Harry Potter or something, this would be more of a discussion.
I voted for Star Wars simply because I saw the SW movies first and Star Wars generally makes better video and computer games.

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 6:24 pm
by parno4u
i liked the lord of the rings

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 7:34 pm
by Gilligan
Lord of the Rings. It was SOOOOOO much more epic and suspenseful.

Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 7:36 pm
by Fircoal
I know I'm going to get flamed for this, but I don't like either of them.


Posted:
Mon May 21, 2007 7:42 pm
by freezie
..How...Can...Those...Can...Even...Be...Compared...To...Harry Potter!?!
NON-SENSE!