Yes, I realize that Conquer Club's remonstrations provide a vivid example of how widespread incendiarism is the price we'd pay for making "piezocrystallization" a dirty word, but for the sake of brevity I've had to express myself in simplified terms. Of course, I'm not writing this statement for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. Either Conquer Club has no real conception of the sweep of history, or it is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. It is well known that Conquer Club turns its back on those who have been the most loyal to it. But Conquer Club is still going around insisting that its debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to it that it is locked into its present course of destruction. It does not have the interest or the will to change its fundamentally self-righteous apothegms.
But I digress. If Conquer Club continues to sensationalize all of the issues, I will be obliged to do something about it. And you know me: I never neglect my obligations. Conquer Club's perspective is that it is as innocent as a newborn lamb. My perspective, in contrast, is that before Conquer Club initiated a nonrepresentationalism flap to help promote its shameless calumnies, people everywhere were expected to place a high value on honor and self-respect. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that we must honor our nation's glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be Conquer Club's most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Conquer Club to help it spoon-feed us its pabulum. Conquer Club's confreres consider its analects a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of factionalism. For all intents and purposes, I and Conquer Club part company when it comes to the issue of onanism. It feels that it can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that it considers addlepated or bitter, while I believe that it uses big words like "crystallographically" to make itself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although Conquer Club's memoirs may reek like a skunk, Conquer Club maintains that it is the way, the truth, and the light. Perhaps it would be best for it to awaken from its delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that its idiotic claim that it is its moral imperative to keep us perennially behind the eight ball is just that, an idiotic claim.
There is another side to the issue. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that the real question here is not, "How much longer can we tolerate Conquer Club's vengeful agendas before the whole country collectively throws up?". The real question is rather, "What is Conquer Club's secret agenda?" I've never gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from Conquer Club. But what is clear is that we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which refractory roustabouts like Conquer Club are completely absent. The other road leads into the darkness of Jacobinism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? Apparently, even know-it-all Conquer Club doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't matter if it did, given that its gofers all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way Conquer Club keeps them loyal to it is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, when one examines the ramifications of letting Conquer Club achieve total world domination, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that the irony is that its most fickle manuscripts are also its most condescending. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent." How I pity Conquer Club if I were to be its judge. I would start by notifying the jury that you should not ask, "Why can't Conquer Club simply enjoy the fruits of its own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs?", but rather, "To what degree is Conquer Club going to scar little children's self-image?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because it has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. Conquer Club can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches its nostrils, it'll start talking about the joy of voyeurism and how things have never been better. As you listen to Conquer Club's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice its hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that in order to convince us that it is a perpetual victim of injustice, Conquer Club often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes.
If I have a bias, it is only against insecure lackwits who suborn censorious, uncontrollable traitors to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous. Personally, I don't expect Conquer Club to give up its crusade to gag the innocent accused from protesting anarchism-motivated prosecutions. But we'll see. There is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil organizations like Conquer Club. Why Conquer Club would even pretend that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else is beyond me.
Conquer Club keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that its precepts provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. The purpose of this deception may be to canonize loquacious energumens as nomological emblems of propriety. Or maybe the purpose is to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. Oh what a tangled web Conquer Club weaves when first it practices to deceive. It's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. Conquer Club distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its current opinions.
If you think that it's okay if Conquer Club's wisecracks initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend, then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what Conquer Club wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance, such as that its reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only noxious answers, otiose resolutions to conflicts. Trapped by the cognitive dissonance engendered by hard evidence and common sense, Conquer Club feels obligated to transmogrify society's petty gripes and irrational fears into "issues" to be catered to in a rebarbative attempt to justify its credos. Some choleric dopeheads actually contend that men are spare parts in the social repertoire -- mere optional extras. This is the kind of muddled thinking that Conquer Club is encouraging with its antics. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as belligerent derelicts.
Conquer Club always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to it; nothing else matters -- except maybe to pit people against each other. I tell you this because if you look back over some of my older statements, you'll see that I predicted that Conquer Club would hinder economic growth and job creation. And, as I predicted, it did. But you know, that was not a difficult prediction to make. Anyone who has bothered to learn even a little about Conquer Club could have made the same prediction. Conquer Club is not only pompous, but it also lacks the self-control necessary to conform its behavior to reasonable norms. Perhaps Conquer Club has never had to take a stand and fight for something as critical as our right to rage, rage against the dying of the light. But if you ever ask it to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed.
Although Conquer Club was likely following the dictates of its conscience when it decided to place our children at imminent risk of serious harm, the fact remains that it frequently avers its support of democracy and its love of freedom. But one need only look at what it is doing -- as opposed to what it is saying -- to understand its true aims. Conquer Club's thesis is that terrorism and ruffianism are identical concepts. That's entirely frowzy, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Conquer Club's favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". It likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. It then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for it to institutionalize sex discrimination by requiring different standards of protection and behavior for men and women. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that Conquer Club's perceptions are a logical absurdity, a series of deductions from a premise that has been denied. Speaking of absurdities, if Conquer Club had its way, schools would teach students that this is the best of all possible worlds and that it is the best of all possible organizations. This is not education but indoctrination. It prevents students from learning about how all of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of Conquer Club's prissy long-term goals. They are not a cause; they are an effect.
Is it just me, or do other people also think that Conquer Club's theories represent explicitly its overly accepting attitude towards callous, tyrannical quidnuncs? I ask, because if Conquer Club could have one wish, it'd wish for the ability to lead an active disinformation campaign. Then, people the world over would be too terrified to acknowledge that Conquer Club claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to force us to do things or take stands against our will. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Conquer Club's toadies. The truth is that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Conquer Club's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Conquer Club's writings to know that Conquer Club doesn't know the difference between right and wrong. The sooner it comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us. It is becoming increasingly obvious to many people that I have begged Conquer Club's buddies to step forth and develop a rational-empirical base for dialogue about Conquer Club's quips. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Conquer Club might retaliate? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let me take a stab at it: One can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Conquer Club, however, is more likely to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of venal conspiracies. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this statement. Someone, possibly Conquer Club itself or one of its secret police, will write a vainglorious piece about how crass I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.
For everyone who read that, kudos to you. I know I sure as hell didn't. Thanks be to this site: http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
Gotcha!
