Page 1 of 1
Your opinion

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:26 pm
by boogiesadda
A three player game NO CARDS...... Red has North America, Blue has Europe and Africa , Green has Oceania. Blue breaks Reds bonus, Blue has 3 men protecting the border of Africa, green has 5 on Middle East. Green receives 6 more armies making the border 9v3, green doesn't break Blues bonus instead he goes after Red in North America. Green and Blue have not attacked each other in the last 3 turns. Would you be suspicious of an alliance.

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:28 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
Sometimes i like to go for the player without a bonus for his cards, instead of having the strongest player take his
but ya the last 3 turns...

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:29 pm
by everywhere116
Alliance? Heck these may even be multis. Link to the game?

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:31 pm
by ksslemp
If green was attempting to eliminate blue for their cards, it would'nt be suspicious. If there wasnt a chance for that then yes, suspicious.

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:40 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
Tell me if this is suspicous
triples game, freestyle, everyone on the other team makes the same move at the same time, im willing to beleive that they are aqauinted but its ridiculous of how they work and how fast they play, they all move in less then a minute or two...this seriously pisses me off when i see this happen, unfair advantage to my point of view


Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:42 pm
by boogiesadda
Ok i have edited it..........This game is no cards!!

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:42 pm
by DirtyDishSoap
Suspicous then

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:44 pm
by boogiesadda
Then after i get suspicious and call them out BAM the very next turn the both attack each other!! yet bitch at me for accusing them

Posted:
Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:45 pm
by boogiesadda

Posted:
Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:33 am
by boogiesadda
come on people vote
