Conquer Club

What do you guys and girls think about the warming up of our earth.

What must we do about it, are can we do about it

I am worried about it

Build a space ship and find another planet to screw up.

Easier said than done

in before ignorant, lazy idiots say it is natural and that there's nothing we can do about it

Part of it is a natural process, the problem is that we are polluting the environment not only speeding up the process but also making it worse than it would normally be.

My opinion is that carbon emissions far exceed plant life capability to turn it into oxygen.

Ride a bicycle to work.
Plant more vegetation.

Easy to say, hard to do.

I'm blaming deforestation the most, god damn indonesians and brazilians don't know when to stop.

unriggable wrote:I'm blaming deforestation the most, god damn indonesians and brazilians don't know when to stop.

unriggable wrote:I'm blaming deforestation the most, god damn indonesians and brazilians don't know when to stop.

As if other people don't read their morning papers daily.

unriggable wrote:I'm blaming deforestation the most, god damn indonesians and brazilians don't know when to stop.

Good man. That's what I do - it's much easier.

God damnit, don't you guys know when something is a joke?

I did. My response was a joke too. Don't know about the others, bit literal-minded if you ask me.

neoni wrote:in before ignorant, lazy idiots say it is natural and that there's nothing we can do about it

there was also a study recently done combined with the new information they have gotten from mars and it states that both earth and mars is heating up normally, and earth is only slightly abnormal and it is not doin much to effect it

if you wanna go the way of big companies sittin there payin money for the scientists to find that out ill say that Al Gore who had a lot of money decided to pay a bunch of scientists to make everyone scared of global warming so he could get more votes by being the first to sit there and say "ill do something about it"

either way i fail to give a rats ass.. you worry about global warming, ill worry about the meteor that is supposed to hit us in i think 2029... or was it 2012... hmm

saw it on the history channel, meteor is supposed to come in so close that it goes between the earth and its satellites...

soo ya.. we are all gonna die, shut up and go away people...

Global warming is a natural process that humans are not affecting. Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science. As such, I'm not worried about it. Besides, here in Michigan, we could have used a little warming, February was the one of the coldest in history here.

and i saw some where that al gore uses the most energy out of any one in the US plains/cars/housing things like that . sorry i dont know where the link is to that

Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.

Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.

Serbia wrote:Global warming is a natural process that humans are not affecting. Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science. As such, I'm not worried about it. Besides, here in Michigan, we could have used a little warming, February was the one of the coldest in history here.

100% agreed.

this was going to happen sooner or later

I honestly dont know how we are going to tone the carbon dioxide thats being released into the atmosphere down a little, unless we all go back to riding bikes which i dont see happenin any time soon...ya i got nothin

Stopper wrote:

Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.

Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.

The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.

We could, you know, not pollute. Oh, and it's not necessarily global warming. It's a global climate change.

Serbia wrote:

Stopper wrote:

Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.

Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.

The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.

There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.

I think Richard Branson offered a prize to the first person who can create a CO2 -> O2 + C machine.

unriggable wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Stopper wrote:

Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.

Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.

The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.

There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.

I think Richard Branson offered a prize to the first person who can create a CO2 -> O2 + C machine.

The one problem with the "evidence" is that it's debatable. It is not conclusive, therefore, not science.

But ok, I'll cool it with my "not science" arguement for a bit.

unriggable wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Stopper wrote:

Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.

Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.

The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.

There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.

I think Richard Branson offered a prize to the first person who can create a CO2 -> O2 + C machine.

And made the air cleaner, to boot. So even if it's not causing a global warm-up, people will be healthier in general. Now if only they would eat right and excercise....

Serbia wrote:

unriggable wrote:

Serbia wrote:

Stopper wrote:

Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.

Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.

The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.

There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.

I think Richard Branson offered a prize to the first person who can create a CO2 -> O2 + C machine.

The one problem with the "evidence" is that it's debatable. It is not conclusive, therefore, not science.

But ok, I'll cool it with my "not science" arguement for a bit.

Well even so it would be nice if we could take care of the enviroment and not destroy the ecosystems. Contrary to popular belief, we can't survive without certain animals and plants.