Conquer Club

There is a man out there named Neal Adams. Back in the 70's he was an illustrator for Batman and X-men comics. Now he is comming up with insane theories and believes that all that we know about science should change because of them. This man has little or no scientific background, as I said before, he illustrated comics. And now he "knows" that all of science is wrong because he said so. This man is INSANE! If you want to see his insanity first hand, which I would recomend, check out his web site;
http://www.nealadams.com/nmu.html
Some of his theories include the fact that the earth is getting bigger, and was infact much smaller millions of years ago, and I mean MUCH smaller. This also applys to the moon, and all of the other planets out there. He also believes that continental drift isn't because of the fact that tectonic plates are moving in random directions and crashing into each other, but are only drifting apart (we know this is false because of the himalayens in India). So check him out for a good laugh

you forgot the "GFY" or the "f*ck you hector" options...how am i supposed to vote?

Sorry. I thought I would save myself the humiliation of that being the highest of all the options.

He's pretty self-righteous.

unriggable wrote:He's pretty self-righteous.

I know, he's just like "Look at me! I'm right and a hundred years of science is wrong, just because I said so!"

This Gent has a screwy brain

it is indeed.... intersting. he made some things to make sense but he needs to studies phyics more. if this had happened we would be missing things. and i am pretty sure his water calcutions are off.

plus we do not compelly understand how the world works. and how does he account for gravity, less mass less gravity. his theory can easily be torn apart.

watch clip 3, i... am intersted in his points they are to big to be impact craters, but mass just dosent apear if he account for mass and the gravitional calutions, it would be.......intersting, but of couse he would ahve to account for all the calutions of the moon slowly moving a awy from us. when you think about it , it dosent make sense not to mention the theory of how the moon was created adds more problems. he would really need to find some sor................................., i just realized something i was having a disscusion and someone said the earth because of constant mass extinicon earth could have an anunal metoer shower, a big one,hhhhmmmmmm. it could maybe account for some mass but not 50%.

hes nuts, i watch all of them hes complelely full of himself. hes making an 8th grade mistake. when plates move what happens to the plates that collide they go under ground an melt. that is the answrer, not this growing wat a complete fool

s.xkitten wrote:you forgot the "GFY" or the "f*ck you hector" options...how am i supposed to vote?

agreed

um.... wow..... thats interesting....i think?

omg, we have to change all of scinece!

Well, I think changing science could be a good thing, if they made it easier. Then students would find it easier to pass exams, and we wouldn't have shortages of science teachers all the time.

Eg, 92 natural elements in the Periodic Table is far too many. The Greeks managed with four.

No Cynthia, he just THINKS we need to change all of science.

Stopper wrote:Well, I think changing science could be a good thing, if they made it easier. Then students would find it easier to pass exams, and we wouldn't have shortages of science teachers all the time.

Eg, 92 natural elements in the Periodic Table is far too many. The Greeks managed with four.

Agree, ever have to do quantum mechanics? God its such a pain...

f*ck facts.

If you ignore modern techtonic theory, this stuff is actually pretty believable. even though it is wrong, it is still a nice theory and gets you to think of everything differently.

wcaclimbing wrote:If you ignore modern techtonic theory, this stuff is actually pretty believable. even though it is wrong, it is still a nice theory and gets you to think of everything differently.

The earth is a giant ballon of helium. Water just 'appears'. Not believable at all unless you flunked out of elementary school.

That is what I was thinking. A) If the Earth is growing, where is the extra mass coming from? B) What about the water?

In one of his clips, it says that he didn't include water in the transformation because it didn't make sense VISUALLY, but his theories don't really make sense any other way, I find.

Exactly.

He also has no education regarding the tectonic plates, apparently. People need to KNOW THEIR ENEMY.

hecter wrote:No Cynthia, he just THINKS we need to change all of science.

well, i think (gasps from the audience) that this is just a plot to take over the forum's and incapacitate our elbows....shame on you hecter