Conquer Club

Necrobumping - A Conversation

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby Serbia on Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:56 am

This post was made by tzor who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.

If the old fool has addressed me with anything terribly important (important, tzor? lol I know, right?) someone let me know. I told the old fool I was done with him; perhaps he just doesn't believe me. I also told him to go create a multi if he really wants to talk to me; he just doesn't listen well. Getting old sucks.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby tzor on Tue Jul 12, 2016 8:36 am

This post was made by Serbia who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.


I can play the game as well. And peace will come upon the earth.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby Serbia on Tue Jul 12, 2016 4:57 pm

This post was made by tzor who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.

The old boy just doesn't learn, does he?! I CANNOT READ WHAT YOU ARE SAYING TZOR GO TROLL SOMEWHERE ELSE OLD PERSON.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby riskllama on Tue Jul 12, 2016 5:23 pm

you're all a bunch of idiots...
Image
User avatar
Lieutenant riskllama
 
Posts: 8976
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:50 pm
Location: deep inside Queen Charlotte.

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby jonesthecurl on Sun Jul 17, 2016 2:46 pm

Summary of recent posts:
"what's that? Eh? I can't hear you."
"What's that ?Eh? I can't hear you."
"I can't hear him, you know. "
"What? What did he say?"
"Well, tell him I'm not speaking to him."
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jonesthecurl
 
Posts: 4613
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Location: disused action figure warehouse

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby Serbia on Sun Jul 17, 2016 4:26 pm

Well at least we know it's mutual then. Thanks Jonesy.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:27 am

Serbia wrote:I'd like to start a discussion on necrobumping. I propose that in this particular forum, it's unnecessary to have a "no necrobumping" rule. This forum is essentially a spam forum, in that nothing posted here has anything to do with Conquer Club. There are already rules against being "intentionally annoying", so rules against necrobumping aren't necessary. But I'd like to get some mods to weigh in on this, and start an actual conversation.


You are right in principle, but wrong in your understanding of why the rule is necessary.

Nevermind the fact that necrobumping itself is 'illegal' or the ignorance of the reality necrobumping can be and usually is the best way to ANTI-SPAMMIFY this forum, let me make an analogy as for the real reason necrobumping is a bannable offense. It was created intentionally as a way to ban Phatscotty kind of along the same lines of the way the 'Al Capone' law was created. I had no idea the rule even existed before I got hit with a 90 day ban for it. And it wasn't even a bad necrobump, in fact it was totally innocent. I made a thread for 'Watchmen' simply out of gratitude and for the purpose of sharing. At the time it was explained that since nobody posted in over 90 days the thread was dead and should be allowed to die. As to why I was given no warning or why there was no announcement of a new rule, no answers came in reply in fact I got no replies to my tickets at all.

So, basically yes, instead of going with a thread that already existed and is pages full of relevant material and discussion, they want a second thread created on the same topic. Ironically, many others soon after made it a point to necrobump any thread that existed in the past to show the newer repeat thread the conversations had already taken place and before starting all over again with the 101 media programming mass target marketing of slogans they should carouse the old thread to see if their topic matter had already been addressed. Nobody got in trouble for any of that and soon after necrobumping was dropped as a bannable offense. Of course, this happened just after I came back from a 90 day ban. It was kind of fun to watch the reality though that it seemed like the powers of the time that were but no longer be actually brought back flaming giving all the same pro-life thread fights were happening all over again.

Don't believe me? I know it sounds a little pompous and self pretentious. But add in the fact that my other bannable offense was double posting.... yes, I said double posting. Nevermind it was 100% accidental and hurt nobody, my 'warning' again was skipped and that was my first ban. I'm glad the place changed since then but it seems in the ridiculously ironic reality that those who call themselves 'Liberals' or "Lefty's" or 'Progressives' and even 'Socialists' who are you know of course all about freedom and diversity did everything they could to prevent free speech from being heard and eventually destroyed those who spoke out against the new world order of Socialism. But the absolute and purposeful of vicious attacks from the left and the wildest flaming and trolling were deemed justified. Sounds kinda familiar...

NAZI - National Socialist Workers Party of Germany
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby Serbia on Thu Jul 21, 2016 6:54 am

Phatscotty wrote:
Serbia wrote:I'd like to start a discussion on necrobumping. I propose that in this particular forum, it's unnecessary to have a "no necrobumping" rule. This forum is essentially a spam forum, in that nothing posted here has anything to do with Conquer Club. There are already rules against being "intentionally annoying", so rules against necrobumping aren't necessary. But I'd like to get some mods to weigh in on this, and start an actual conversation.


You are right in principle, but wrong in your understanding of why the rule is necessary.

Nevermind the fact that necrobumping itself is 'illegal' or the ignorance of the reality necrobumping can be and usually is the best way to ANTI-SPAMMIFY this forum, let me make an analogy as for the real reason necrobumping is a bannable offense. It was created intentionally as a way to ban Phatscotty


This isn't about you. I can't take you seriously when you immediately say a rule is in place specifically for you. Whatever you wrote after that has been summarily dismissed.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Necrobumping - A Conversation

Postby Symmetry on Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:28 pm

Serbia wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Serbia wrote:I'd like to start a discussion on necrobumping. I propose that in this particular forum, it's unnecessary to have a "no necrobumping" rule. This forum is essentially a spam forum, in that nothing posted here has anything to do with Conquer Club. There are already rules against being "intentionally annoying", so rules against necrobumping aren't necessary. But I'd like to get some mods to weigh in on this, and start an actual conversation.


You are right in principle, but wrong in your understanding of why the rule is necessary.

Nevermind the fact that necrobumping itself is 'illegal' or the ignorance of the reality necrobumping can be and usually is the best way to ANTI-SPAMMIFY this forum, let me make an analogy as for the real reason necrobumping is a bannable offense. It was created intentionally as a way to ban Phatscotty


This isn't about you. I can't take you seriously when you immediately say a rule is in place specifically for you. Whatever you wrote after that has been summarily dismissed.


Part of it is about him, sadly. He used to necrobump a bunch of threads by a poster, or get others to necrobump them, then complain that said poster was spamming in an attempt to get them banned.

It was understandably frowned upon by the mods.

So that's why he turns up complaining when this stuff gets discussed. The forum was briefly renamed "bumpage", he did it so much.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users