Conquer Club

Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Will the Repubs allow Obama to appoint a new justice?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby saxitoxin on Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:50 pm

Bernie Sanders wrote:Hillary will do NOTHING about Corporate and Wall Street influence, she's been bought and sold.


To be fair, it'll be hard for her to reform Wall Street from cell block D.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch declined Wednesday to discuss how she would make a decision about whether to prosecute Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over classified information found on her private email server.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the ... z418kufxdX
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13405
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby Bernie Sanders on Wed Feb 24, 2016 8:53 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
Bernie Sanders wrote:Hillary will do NOTHING about Corporate and Wall Street influence, she's been bought and sold.


To be fair, it'll be hard for her to reform Wall Street from cell block D.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch declined Wednesday to discuss how she would make a decision about whether to prosecute Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over classified information found on her private email server.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the ... z418kufxdX


She won't be charged for any crimes. What she did was stupid, as far as that email thing is concerned.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:14 am

Bernie Sanders wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Thank you Duk. That was the kind of response I was expecting and trying to elicit. I agree with most of what you have said, but I think Obama did accomplish more than you credit him, as Sym has illustrated. Furthermore, I believe history will show that he was an excellent president, but too many Americans are colour blind and he was thwarted repeatedly by a hostile congress and senate.

I believe the American political system is broken. The money of big business as well as the lobbying needs to be removed.

I am glad we have stringent limits on those things in Canada, it lessens corporate influence and the influence of the super rich.


Hillary will do NOTHING about Corporate and Wall Street influence, she's been bought and sold.

Bernie Sanders is now leading Clinton in 3 national polls. She'll win South Carolina and Bernie is concentrating for BIG TUESDAY, where 880 delegates are waiting to be scooped up.

President Obama is facing a Congress that will stall any nominations for Supreme Court. Fine with me, Bernie will shove a very Progressive Judge into the Supreme Court. The Republicans might as well deal with President Obama and settle for a Centrist candidate. Why do I say that? Trump will win the Republican nomination, but will be beaten in November. The Independent vote is crucial in November and they will reject Trump for what he is, a reality star.


Bernie, I agree with everything you stated. I wish I was an American so I could vote for Sanders. I think he is the best candidate for the US as well as Canada and the world. I hope you are right and he wins the nomination and then the White House. I also hope that he gets a government that supports him. At least his skin shade would be more palatable to a great number of the American populous it seems.

If he doesn't get the nomination, Hillary is still better than any of the Republican candidates. Trump is a racist bigot, but Cruz is an extremist fundamentalist and a very dangerous man. He scares me the most. I hope the fact he was born in Canada precludes him from the White House.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby Bernie Sanders on Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:42 am

ImageThere's a Republican establishment movement working hard to find a way to knock down Trump, but it ain't going to happen. They say that Trump is not a Republican and he's a liberal.

There won't be a large turn out of Republicans in November to elect Trump, many will stay home or as the old Senator Bob Dole said, "he may oversleep that day."
Image The insults and accusations have torn up the unity of the Republican Party.



Bernie Sanders has the excitement and the rock star status to rally ALL Democrats, most Independents and even some disgruntled Republicans to vote for him in November. This will cause what political pundits call the coat tail effect and elect other Democrats to office. The Democrats have a good chance of winning the Senate back.

Image

Trump is the best thing to happen to the Democratic Party and Progressives all over the U.S. You really think Blacks, Hispanics and other minorities will vote for Trump? That's kind of laughable.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 10:08 am

Hopefully, Bernie gets the nomination and the minorities carry him to power. My fear is something will happen to him. There are far too many armed right wing crazies in America. Far too many.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby Bernie Sanders on Thu Feb 25, 2016 10:18 am

notyou2 wrote:Hopefully, Bernie gets the nomination and the minorities carry him to power. My fear is something will happen to him. There are far too many armed right wing crazies in America. Far too many.


This is true. Bernie is being protected by the Secret Service, but Bernie is driving them crazy. He has a habit of telling the driver to stop, so he can take his walks and greet people on the street.

With that said, there's too many whacked out right wing nutsos, who may feel it's there duty to prevent AMERIKA becoming COMMUNIST!
Last edited by Bernie Sanders on Thu Feb 25, 2016 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 10:27 am

Bernie Sanders wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Hopefully, Bernie gets the nomination and the minorities carry him to power. My fear is something will happen to him. There are far too many armed right wing crazies in America. Far too many.


This is true. Bernie is being protected by the Secrete Service, but Bernie is driving them crazy. He has a habit of telling the driver to stop, so he can take his walks and greet people on the street.

With that said, there's too many whacked out right wing nutsos, who may feel it's there duty to prevent AMERIKA becoming COMMUNIST!


This is currently my greatest fear in US politics.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby patches70 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 10:36 am

notyou2 wrote:Hopefully, Bernie gets the nomination and the minorities carry him to power. My fear is something will happen to him. There are far too many armed right wing crazies in America. Far too many.


Are you nuts? Bernie isn't going to win the nomination, the Democrat party elite hate him. The only way Bernie beats Hilary is if Hilary is indicted and sent to jail and that ain't gonna happen (even though she deserves to be indicted and if found guilty sent to prison).
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 12:59 pm

patches70 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Hopefully, Bernie gets the nomination and the minorities carry him to power. My fear is something will happen to him. There are far too many armed right wing crazies in America. Far too many.


Are you nuts? Bernie isn't going to win the nomination, the Democrat party elite hate him. The only way Bernie beats Hilary is if Hilary is indicted and sent to jail and that ain't gonna happen (even though she deserves to be indicted and if found guilty sent to prison).




Shouldn't you be at a gun range somewhere?

I bet you thought the Obama was going lose in 2012.

You're going to have a conniption when Bernie enters the White House.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby Bernie Sanders on Thu Feb 25, 2016 1:22 pm

patches70 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:Hopefully, Bernie gets the nomination and the minorities carry him to power. My fear is something will happen to him. There are far too many armed right wing crazies in America. Far too many.


Are you nuts? Bernie isn't going to win the nomination, the Democrat party elite hate him. The only way Bernie beats Hilary is if Hilary is indicted and sent to jail and that ain't gonna happen (even though she deserves to be indicted and if found guilty sent to prison).


Another post from patches. Filled with spelling errors and such.

Why do I picture you being outside a trailer with a Confederate flag emblazon on an old tee-shirt, chewing on tobacco with bottles, cans and trash all around you?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Bernie Sanders
 
Posts: 5105
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:30 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby patches70 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 2:48 pm

notyou2 wrote:
You're going to have a conniption when Bernie enters the White House.


Why do you think Bernie Sanders is going to win the nomination? What facts are you basing your prediction on?

At this moment, Hillary has 505 delegates pledged and Sanders has 71. Do you think the voters have a say in the primary process?

In two weeks from now it looks likely that Bernie Sanders will be done unless something drastic happens. That's the reality.
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 4:27 pm

patches70 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:
You're going to have a conniption when Bernie enters the White House.


Why do you think Bernie Sanders is going to win the nomination? What facts are you basing your prediction on?

At this moment, Hillary has 505 delegates pledged and Sanders has 71. Do you think the voters have a say in the primary process?

In two weeks from now it looks likely that Bernie Sanders will be done unless something drastic happens. That's the reality.


Perhaps I should have stated...If Bernie enters the White House.

I do predict a Democrat president.

I must admit I am ignorant of the nomination process but learning.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby patches70 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:41 pm

notyou2 wrote:I must admit I am ignorant of the nomination process but learning.


Well, then you should try to accept that Bernie is most likely already finished. The picture should be quite clear after Super Tuesday. The super delegates just aren't going to support Bernie. Hillary is going to get pretty much all of them and the pledged delegates will be at best split between them.
Sanders only chance is to have flat out landslide wins which just isn't going to happen. Even if Sanders gets 55% of the vote in a particular state, that won't be near enough to get enough delegates. Sanders has to crush and get 75%+ of the popular vote in virtually every state and no where in the primaries has he done that well and he still wouldn't win very many super delegates (if any).

It kinda sucks because Hillary is absolutely horrible, she should be facing criminal charges. Bernie should also shoulder a big amount of the blame for his failed campaign because that idiot defended Clinton. Bernie should be pounding on not only her connections to the big banks but also her criminality in the past. But as we remember in the debates "we're sick of hearing about those damn e-mails". Bernie just digs his own campaign grave saying stuff like that.
Does anyone thing that the Republicans are going to give Hillary a pass in the general election? Bernie does her no favors by playing with kid gloves and he sinks his own campaign.

The only thing you really have to understand about the Presidential primaries, not, is that who runs for President for whichever party is decided not by the regular voters but instead by a very small, select group of party leaders and elite insiders, all of whom pretty much can't stand Sanders (in the case of the democratic party).

You're prediction of the Democrat president is also not based in reality. All you need to do is go back and look throughout American history and where a party that has a two term incumbent President rarely wins the Presidency at the end of the incumbents terms.
The pendulum swings at a fairly consistent manner.
You had Bush Jr won two terms, in comes Obama.
Before that you had Clinton with two terms, in comes Bush Jr.
Reagan was an exception, he had two terms and Bush Sr wins but he loses his bid for reelection.
Nixon won two terms, resigned at the beginning of his second term, Ford takes over and loses to Carter.
Eisenhower two terms, Kennedy wins next.
Truman won reelection after taking over for FDR, Eisenhower then wins.
FDR is the second exception with 4 terms and his case is markedly different and unique.


But you see the trend here, one party has the presidency for two terms, the American people get sick of that particular party in charge and elect someone from the other party. Since FDR there has been only one exception, Reagan followed by Bush and that didn't go well for Bush.

Since FDR the democrats have never held the office of President for two terms and then won again at the end of that President's two terms.
The trend will most likely continue especially when it's Hillary running. No one likes Hillary because no one trusts Hillary.

The absolute best thing that could happen if the democrats want to win this election cycle would be Hillary getting indicted. This would not mean Bernie would get to run for President. Hillary getting taken out by the FBI and the DOJ would allow the Dem's to run with Plan B.
Come Hell or High water there is no way the Democratic Party is going to let Bernie Sanders run for President.

I think the political scientists give the Republican's a base 67% chance of winning the White House regardless of the candidate. When you start plugging in specific scenarios it gets even worse for the Democrats. If you want the Democrats to have a reasonable chance to win the White House then you best hope Cruz or Rubio wins the nomination.
Trump is forecast at the moment to be 97% to win against Hillary and 99% to win against Sanders if Trump is the nominee.
You can laugh and roll your eyes if you want and Trump is quite unpalatable but he knows how to run against these people because he's tapped into the same thing that Bernie taps into. The absolute disgust, anger and general feed up attitude the American people have with both parties.

Never will you find Trump agreeing with any of the other candidates on anything except one. Bernie Sanders. Look it up yourself, one at least two issues Trump has said he agrees with Bernie. For the rest of the candidates, Republican and Democrat (Hillary) Trump pones them over and over again.

If you wanna really understand why Hillary, Bernie, Cruz, Rubio are all screwed against Trump, then read this article (How America Made Donald Trump Unstoppable) in Rolling Stone by Matt Taibbi. He explains exactly why Trump has ascended and he is correct.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/ne ... e-20160224
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:53 pm

I think you are wrong. I believe it will be Trump, but the fact he has shown himself to be a bigot and racist is unpalatable to the mainstream American public and especially the minorities. The democrats (whoever it is) will win as they will organize a grass roots campaign, just as Obama did twice.

I am well aware of the 2 term cycle having lived through most of the elections you mention.

However, today's voter is far more cynical, far more disinterested and looking for more rapid change. The people see through the facades now and are bitter. They will not elect a racist bigot.

I sincerely hope it is Bernie but I am afraid what you say is true.

Corporate America needs to stop interfering in the US political system.

Unfortunately it appears you are all owned by the corporations and super rich. Your country has degenerated into a fiefdom and we in Canada are following you.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby patches70 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 6:11 pm

Dude, read the article, you are missing some major things that you haven't considered. You talk about facades, the biggest facades are Hillary, Cruz, Rubio. You can't find bigger facades than those tools.

Read the article, it'll be worth it.
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby Symmetry on Thu Feb 25, 2016 7:49 pm

It's a typical Matt Tabbi article, if you haven't read it, and if you've not read his stuff before, it's satire, sharp in places, fun in others, and silly in the rest. A good read, but it's worth knowing that he's a satirist.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:52 pm

patches70 wrote:Dude, read the article, you are missing some major things that you haven't considered. You talk about facades, the biggest facades are Hillary, Cruz, Rubio. You can't find bigger facades than those tools.

Read the article, it'll be worth it.


I am quoting my thoughts patches. I am not referencing any media, I have formulated my own thoughts and opinions based on the information I have seen and my wisdom in life. It is simply an opinion, but I will read the article.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:35 am

Patches, I have done some research on the nomination process specifically as it relates to the Democratic nomination and found something very interesting. The Sanders Clinton race is anything but over.

Here is a quote

"But despite Clinton’s massive 452-to-19 lead among superdelegates who have endorsed so far, party officials simply aren’t going to overrule the will of Democratic voters. Doing so would damage the party and almost certainly doom the nominee. Imagine, say, Donald Trump being able to (accurately) claim that his general election opponent couldn’t even win over a majority of Democrats, and was only on the ballot because the establishment rigged the game. That's not going to happen. This is going to be decided by voters.

What is disturbing, however, is that many mainstream outlets (including MSNBC and Politico) have begun combining superdelegate totals in with pledged delegates as part of their results on election night, and The New York Times, the Associated Press, Bloomberg news and others have begun including superdelegate endorsements in their overall delegate counts. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting points out that this didn’t use to be the case, and doing so gives the false impression that superdelegates are somehow connected to the voting itself. They are not, and the media should stop pretending otherwise."

Here is the article.

http://inthesetimes.com/article/18913/bernie-sanders-delegate-path-to-victory-super-tuesday


GO BERNIE!!!!
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby tzor on Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:45 am

Bernie Sanders wrote:Hillary will do NOTHING about Corporate and Wall Street influence, she's been bought and sold.


People often think they have "bought" Hillary when in fact they are only renting her. Please deposit another $6 MILLION for the next four years. :twisted:
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby patches70 on Sat Feb 27, 2016 7:26 pm

One last chance for you to admit to reality, not.


Let's look at what you apparently miss in this quote. Note the bolded-

notyou2 wrote:Patches, I have done some research on the nomination process specifically as it relates to the Democratic nomination and found something very interesting. The Sanders Clinton race is anything but over.

Here is a quote

"But despite Clinton’s massive 452-to-19 lead among superdelegates who have endorsed so far, party officials simply aren’t going to overrule the will of Democratic voters. Doing so would damage the party and almost certainly doom the nominee. Imagine, say, Donald Trump being able to (accurately) claim that his general election opponent couldn’t even win over a majority of Democrats, and was only on the ballot because the establishment rigged the game. That's not going to happen. This is going to be decided by voters.

What is disturbing, however, is that many mainstream outlets (including MSNBC and Politico) have begun combining superdelegate totals in with pledged delegates as part of their results on election night, and The New York Times, the Associated Press, Bloomberg news and others have begun including superdelegate endorsements in their overall delegate counts. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting points out that this didn’t use to be the case, and doing so gives the false impression that superdelegates are somehow connected to the voting itself. They are not, and the media should stop pretending otherwise."



GO BERNIE!!!!


You appear to think that if Bernie gets enough regular voters to vote for him the super delegates will have no choice but to pledge for Bernie. The "will" of the voters will not be ignored.


Ok then, run with that then and look at reality. You may ignore the fact that the Democrat elite just won't go for Bernie, but you can't ignore that Hillary is still going to win nearly every single state involved in the super Tuesday.

Hillary has already crushed Bernie in South Carolina. By the end of Tuesday Bernie is certainly going to win Vermont and there is a slim chance he might even be able to win Massachusetts. But he'll lose every other state to Hillary by the end of Super Tuesday.

How's that for the will of the voters?

So, Bernie will win
Vermont.

Hillary will win
South Carolina
Alabama
Arkansas
Colorado
Georgia
Minnesota
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia

with Massachusetts up for grabs.

Where is your reasoning coming from that you think Bernie is somehow going to win enough votes to change those super delegate's minds?
Bernie is going to crush Hillary in Vermont, and I mean crush as in you stomping on a cricket crushed. Hillary hasn't even bothered to even campaign very much at all there. This is to be expected, it's Bernie's home state.

Whatever though, reality will slam you square in the face soon enough no matter how much you chant "Go Bernie!"

What's really hilarious is how people accuse the Republicans for being for the rich, the banks, the corporations and then go and vote for Hillary :lol: who of course if also a candidate for the rich, the banks and the corporations.
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby Symmetry on Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:26 pm

False equivalency, Patches,, the Repubs are characterised as being solely for the rich, Clinton appeals to a spectrum that includes the rich.

Why do you think the Repubs have done so badly in Presidential elections of late?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:47 am

patches70 wrote:One last chance for you to admit to reality, not.


Let's look at what you apparently miss in this quote. Note the bolded-

notyou2 wrote:Patches, I have done some research on the nomination process specifically as it relates to the Democratic nomination and found something very interesting. The Sanders Clinton race is anything but over.

Here is a quote

"But despite Clinton’s massive 452-to-19 lead among superdelegates who have endorsed so far, party officials simply aren’t going to overrule the will of Democratic voters. Doing so would damage the party and almost certainly doom the nominee. Imagine, say, Donald Trump being able to (accurately) claim that his general election opponent couldn’t even win over a majority of Democrats, and was only on the ballot because the establishment rigged the game. That's not going to happen. This is going to be decided by voters.

What is disturbing, however, is that many mainstream outlets (including MSNBC and Politico) have begun combining superdelegate totals in with pledged delegates as part of their results on election night, and The New York Times, the Associated Press, Bloomberg news and others have begun including superdelegate endorsements in their overall delegate counts. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting points out that this didn’t use to be the case, and doing so gives the false impression that superdelegates are somehow connected to the voting itself. They are not, and the media should stop pretending otherwise."



GO BERNIE!!!!


You appear to think that if Bernie gets enough regular voters to vote for him the super delegates will have no choice but to pledge for Bernie. The "will" of the voters will not be ignored.


Ok then, run with that then and look at reality. You may ignore the fact that the Democrat elite just won't go for Bernie, but you can't ignore that Hillary is still going to win nearly every single state involved in the super Tuesday.

Hillary has already crushed Bernie in South Carolina. By the end of Tuesday Bernie is certainly going to win Vermont and there is a slim chance he might even be able to win Massachusetts. But he'll lose every other state to Hillary by the end of Super Tuesday.

How's that for the will of the voters?

So, Bernie will win
Vermont.

Hillary will win
South Carolina
Alabama
Arkansas
Colorado
Georgia
Minnesota
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia

with Massachusetts up for grabs.

Where is your reasoning coming from that you think Bernie is somehow going to win enough votes to change those super delegate's minds?
Bernie is going to crush Hillary in Vermont, and I mean crush as in you stomping on a cricket crushed. Hillary hasn't even bothered to even campaign very much at all there. This is to be expected, it's Bernie's home state.

Whatever though, reality will slam you square in the face soon enough no matter how much you chant "Go Bernie!"

What's really hilarious is how people accuse the Republicans for being for the rich, the banks, the corporations and then go and vote for Hillary :lol: who of course if also a candidate for the rich, the banks and the corporations.


Patches, that was a quote I found. It is not my opinion, it is someone else's. I even linked the article. How do you fail to realize that? It was only a day or two old when I posted that, and I admit it is becoming more and more likely that Hillary wins the nomination. Please don't read links as if I wrote them when I didn't.

I would much prefer Bernie as Hillary is pretty much a vote for the status quo but a little more palatable than the far right extremists and bigots on the Republican side.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby jgordon1111 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:01 pm

notyou2 wrote:I think you are wrong. I believe it will be Trump, but the fact he has shown himself to be a bigot and racist is unpalatable to the mainstream American public and especially the minorities. The democrats (whoever it is) will win as they will organize a grass roots campaign, just as Obama did twice.

I am well aware of the 2 term cycle having lived through most of the elections you mention.

However, today's voter is far more cynical, far more disinterested and looking for more rapid change. The people see through the facades now and are bitter. They will not elect a racist bigot.

I sincerely hope it is Bernie but I am afraid what you say is true.

Corporate America needs to stop interfering in the US political system.

Unfortunately it appears you are all owned by the corporations and super rich. Your country has degenerated into a fiefdom and we in Canada are following you.

Not, you do realize there is a difference between Racist and Bigot right, I have to agree with the bigot part no argument, racist, yes an argument and what Rubio is attempting to do is make him out as one per a CNN interview, I watched that interview start to end and Rubio is in fact taking what TRUMP said out of context as per usual with the establisment politicians, all of you like looking up stuff show anything that proves beyond a doubt that TRUMP is indeed a racist,not just a bigot
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby notyou2 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:22 pm

jgordon1111 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:I think you are wrong. I believe it will be Trump, but the fact he has shown himself to be a bigot and racist is unpalatable to the mainstream American public and especially the minorities. The democrats (whoever it is) will win as they will organize a grass roots campaign, just as Obama did twice.

I am well aware of the 2 term cycle having lived through most of the elections you mention.

However, today's voter is far more cynical, far more disinterested and looking for more rapid change. The people see through the facades now and are bitter. They will not elect a racist bigot.

I sincerely hope it is Bernie but I am afraid what you say is true.

Corporate America needs to stop interfering in the US political system.

Unfortunately it appears you are all owned by the corporations and super rich. Your country has degenerated into a fiefdom and we in Canada are following you.

Not, you do realize there is a difference between Racist and Bigot right, I have to agree with the bigot part no argument, racist, yes an argument and what Rubio is attempting to do is make him out as one per a CNN interview, I watched that interview start to end and Rubio is in fact taking what TRUMP said out of context as per usual with the establisment politicians, all of you like looking up stuff show anything that proves beyond a doubt that TRUMP is indeed a racist,not just a bigot


Yes I know racist and bigot are two distinct things.
Gordon, read these references and you tell me if he's a racist.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump-racism/
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

Postby jgordon1111 on Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:00 pm

notyou2 wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:
notyou2 wrote:I think you are wrong. I believe it will be Trump, but the fact he has shown himself to be a bigot and racist is unpalatable to the mainstream American public and especially the minorities. The democrats (whoever it is) will win as they will organize a grass roots campaign, just as Obama did twice.

I am well aware of the 2 term cycle having lived through most of the elections you mention.

However, today's voter is far more cynical, far more disinterested and looking for more rapid change. The people see through the facades now and are bitter. They will not elect a racist bigot.

I sincerely hope it is Bernie but I am afraid what you say is true.

Corporate America needs to stop interfering in the US political system.

Unfortunately it appears you are all owned by the corporations and super rich. Your country has degenerated into a fiefdom and we in Canada are following you.

Not, you do realize there is a difference between Racist and Bigot right, I have to agree with the bigot part no argument, racist, yes an argument and what Rubio is attempting to do is make him out as one per a CNN interview, I watched that interview start to end and Rubio is in fact taking what TRUMP said out of context as per usual with the establisment politicians, all of you like looking up stuff show anything that proves beyond a doubt that TRUMP is indeed a racist,not just a bigot


Yes I know racist and bigot are two distinct things.
Gordon, read these references and you tell me if he's a racist.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump-racism/


Oh shit please tell me you have something else besides Huffington post , the lead reporting on all things conservative republican, they are insuring a billary win, why do you think that is? Look at what they say about Obama, you would think they support the republican party, but no republican establishment doesn't want TRUMP why? No one stepping up to support Cruz Except Texas govener now that Jeb is out, Rubio is losing his home state badly,so again why is the establishment trying to ensure TRUMP doesn't win even at the cost of billary winning?
User avatar
Private jgordon1111
 
Posts: 1711
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 1:58 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: karel