Moderator: Community Team
Stopper wrote:Ruben Cassar wrote:The European Union's motto is united in diversity. So yes, Europe needs to unite, but at the same time it strives to foster the cultural differences between each of its member states. In fact I think the EU had done a lot of positive things in this aspect. That way you can be patriotic towards your state and towards Europe. At least that's how I see it.
Also about your comment that most people are not enamoured of the idea of a united Europe, the problem the EU has is bureaucracy. It's just way too cumbersome and complicated and politicians are distant from the people. It needs to be simplified. Also the French and Dutch no votes to the EU constitution were more like a no vote to their national governments than to the EU per se.
If we're going to talk about the EU in particular, surely one of the fundamental problems has to be people's attachment to their own nation-states. The activities of the Euro Parliament, EC, and CoJ are certainly poorly reported in Britain, and this is a big factor making those institutions distant from the people, in a way that Westminster isn't. I'm willing to bet it's like that (to a greater or lesser extent) all over Europe. People aren't interested in European news, and even when they are, they see the issues in terms of narrow national self-interest.
This lack of proper reporting may be one reason, incidentally, that allows the EU institutions to become so bloated (and possibly corrupt) - there is also a lack of accountability to the electorates.
One other big factor blocking further integration, BTW, has to be the multitude of languages spoken in the EU [and I'm aware of the EU's commitment to cultural diversity - 23 main official languages, according to Wikipedia.] If only they would all speak English!
neoni wrote:they tried it a while ago with esperanto but it never really took off
Ruben Cassar wrote:neoni wrote:they tried it a while ago with esperanto but it never really took off
I know. But Latin is better than Esperanto. I mean *ahem* the Romans invented Latin...it's bound to be good no?
diddle wrote:be carful stopper, we can't demand everyone to speak english, that an english problem, most of us are too lazy to learn another language, and we demand that everyone speaks english
btownmeggy wrote:Ruben Cassar wrote:neoni wrote:they tried it a while ago with esperanto but it never really took off
I know. But Latin is better than Esperanto. I mean *ahem* the Romans invented Latin...it's bound to be good no?
And a POLACK invented Esperanto. It's bound to be worthless, no?
Ruben Cassar wrote:I am not British however if I was British I would be damn proud of it. In fact there was that saying a few years ago that if you were born British it was like winning the lottery of life.
Seriously now about this England, Scotland, Wales, N. Ireland debate, personally I find it incredible that people are still bickering about these things. Do you think Scotland would be better off by being independent? What could it gain? I respect the Scots and I believe that each region of Great Britain should preserve its culture and traditions but Great Britain is fine as it is.
bigbullyweedave wrote:Ruben Cassar wrote:I am not British however if I was British I would be damn proud of it. In fact there was that saying a few years ago that if you were born British it was like winning the lottery of life.
Seriously now about this England, Scotland, Wales, N. Ireland debate, personally I find it incredible that people are still bickering about these things. Do you think Scotland would be better off by being independent? What could it gain? I respect the Scots and I believe that each region of Great Britain should preserve its culture and traditions but Great Britain is fine as it is.
Cool. We'll just chuck you're wee diddy island in as part of Italy then?![]()
![]()
Stopper wrote:One other big factor blocking further integration, BTW, has to be the multitude of languages spoken in the EU [and I'm aware of the EU's commitment to cultural diversity - 23 main official languages, according to Wikipedia.] If only they would all speak English!
Ruben Cassar wrote:
Btw if the Scots were really united and avoided massacres like Glencoe where the Campbell betrayed the MacDonald and killed them while they were asleep there is a slight chance that Scotland would be independent now!Instead the clans fought each other instead of uniting against the common enemy of the time.
diddle wrote:try and argue with this then.... William Shakespeare,
Lord Nelson,
Charles Darwin,
Charles Dickens,
Stanley Matthews,
Bobby Moore,
Stephen Hawking,
Ellen Macarthur.......to name a few....all english
Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur