Conquer Club

McCain Is Not Constitutionally Eligable To Be President

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

John McCain is...

 
Total votes : 0

Postby DaGip on Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:50 pm

bradleybadly wrote:
DaGip wrote:
bradleybadly wrote:DaGip is that you singing on the guitar about Ron Paul from that youtube video you linked for your sig?


yeah, I know, I know...I suck. But at least I can sing and play guitar, as crappy as it is... :lol:


no I'm not saying your guitar playing is crappy I was just wondering if it was actually you


Yes, that is actually me. (I need to drop a few pounds, I know already!) :wink:
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:22 pm

suggs wrote:But he's a USA citizen now right?
So you've just wasted everyones time by shoddy research, Da GIMP.
Thanks for that :evil:


Arnold is a US Citizen now... but not a natural born citizen. So he's no t eligible.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:24 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:So what? Repeal that amendment. That's a silly law anyways. I wanna see Schwarzenneger President.


You don't repeal the Constitution for one man.

Dumb idea.

... for the record I love Arnold... but you just don't do that.

You do that sort of thing in Russia and Pakistan... not in the US.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:25 pm

Colossus wrote:The other condition of being a natural born citizen is having one parent who is an American citizen, regardless of birthplace. Seriously, try not to be a retard.


Thank you.

I wanted to say this... but wanted to first see if someone beat me to the punch.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:28 pm

Gip

Your posts are somewhat funny... but some are quite dumb.

I think you need to go out and get some sun and fresh air.

I wouldn't mind this one... but you should at least have the courtesy of adding a GFY option to your poll... or an option like "shut up you are worng... he's a natural born citizen... go die". That would work too.

Jim :)
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:29 pm

DaGip wrote:
You are probably correct. But the issue does contain legitimate weight. So first that part of the Constitution would have to be repealed, and then we can have Arnie for Prezinator!


The issue contains NO weight.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:31 pm

DaGip wrote:
Colossus wrote:The other condition of being a natural born citizen is having one parent who is an American citizen, regardless of birthplace. Seriously, try not to be a retard.


Read the post, McCain does not receive US citizenship by merely being born on a US Military base.


Did you even read what Colossus wrote???

He doesn't receive citizenship by being born on a military base.... he receives citizenship by Birthright by having one parent who is a citizen.

It might help GIP if you could understand what you read.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Re: McCain Is Not Constitutionally Eligable To Be President

Postby Backglass on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:38 pm

DaGip wrote:Ron Paul still Rulles!


And when he loses (as we all have known he will for months), when exactly will the nation cave in? The end of the dollar? The end of the world as we know it from biblical prophesy?

Dates please. ;-)
Image
The Pro-TipĀ®, SkyDaddyĀ® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby Frigidus on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:38 pm

Oh man, 6 posts in a row. Sorry jimboston, but

C-C-C-Combo Breaker!
Last edited by Frigidus on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:39 pm

C4 wrote:Kinda of funny. Obama's father is from Kenya while Mccain's linenage has been in the US for a long time. Yet it's more legal for Obama to be president than McCAin. :roll:


Um... if you believe Gip's verbal diarrhea then yes.

In reality NO.

Don't get me started on Obama....
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:41 pm

unriggable wrote:http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/McCain_not_Constitutionally_Eligible_to_be_President

Digg this.


Yes... excellent source.
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby jimboston on Mon Mar 03, 2008 10:44 pm

Frigidus wrote:Oh man, 6 posts in a row. Sorry jimboston, but

C-C-C-Combo Breaker!


Sorry man.

I think the Gip here just knows how to push my buttons.

The thread should get moved out of IK... to a new section more appropriately titled... Unintelligent Konversation. :twisted:
User avatar
Private 1st Class jimboston
 
Posts: 5379
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:45 pm
Location: Boston (Area), Massachusetts; U.S.A.

Postby Backglass on Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:09 pm

C4 wrote:Kinda of funny. Obama's father is from Kenya while Mccain's linenage has been in the US for a long time. Yet it's more legal for Obama to be president than McCAin. :roll:


Yes, technically it is. Do you disagree that McCain was foreign born & Obama is not? Or is it a double standard to you? (BTW Obama's lineage on his mothers side has been here a long time as well...but that probably doesn't count, does it.) :roll:

BTW if you want to condemn a man because if his ancestors, George Bush's ancestors are from Ireland, Bavaria & Canada. Should we send him "back whar he cum from"?

...and which lucky country gets him? :lol:
Image
The Pro-TipĀ®, SkyDaddyĀ® and Image are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Backglass
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: New York

Postby moomaster2000 on Mon Mar 03, 2008 11:58 pm

8 More Years!

Image
Image
User avatar
Corporal moomaster2000
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Encinitas, CA

Re: McCain Is Not Constitutionally Eligable To Be President

Postby DaGip on Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:11 am

Backglass wrote:
DaGip wrote:Ron Paul still Rulles!


And when he loses (as we all have known he will for months), when exactly will the nation cave in? The end of the dollar? The end of the world as we know it from biblical prophesy?

Dates please. ;-)


June 28, 2008...something BIG is going to happen on that date! Write it down! I swear!
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby Tyr on Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:38 pm

does anyone realize that a natural born citizen is also a person born of two american parents where ever they are
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
Cadet Tyr
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Postby Hologram on Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:50 pm

Thanks for repeating the point we've all been making and reviving an obviously dead thread.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
User avatar
Cook Hologram
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Armpit of America

Re: McCain Is Not Constitutionally Eligable To Be President

Postby CoffeeCream on Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:06 am

DaGip wrote:June 28, 2008...something BIG is going to happen on that date! Write it down! I swear!


I'm probably going to regret this but what is going to happen?
luns101 wrote:You should be able to convert a soul from 500 yards away armed only with a Gideon New Testament that you found at a Holiday Inn!!!!


muy_thaiguy wrote:Sir! Permission to do 50 push-ups with the Ark of the Covenant on my back?
User avatar
Corporal CoffeeCream
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:43 pm

Re: McCain Is Not Constitutionally Eligable To Be President

Postby Hologram on Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:20 am

CoffeeCream wrote:
DaGip wrote:June 28, 2008...something BIG is going to happen on that date! Write it down! I swear!


I'm probably going to regret this but what is going to happen?
An enraged Libertarian assassin will be so fed up with everything political that he will kill every Presidential candidate except Ron Paul.

Of course he'll still lose, but that's what'll happen.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
User avatar
Cook Hologram
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Armpit of America

Postby DaGip on Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:27 am

Tyr wrote:does anyone realize that a natural born citizen is also a person born of two american parents where ever they are


Natural born citizens are citizens that are born within the 50 states and need NO special laws or guidelines to be or become a citizen of the United States. You are either a Natural Born Citizen or you are a Naturalized Citizen under United States law.

That means Ron Paul can legally become president because his existence needs NO specialized laws to citizenship, whereas, Mr. MadDog McCain is a citizen under such guidelines that allow him to be a NATURLIZED CITIZEN. Natural Born Citizen and Naturlized Citizen are not the same thing, sorry. Do your research.

The argument still holds weight, sorry Jimboston :wink:
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby Hologram on Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:49 am

Alright Gip, pay very close attention. A natural born citizen is a citizen at birth.

Article II, section i:United States Constitution wrote:No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.


With that pretext we move on to the next argument:

US Code, Title 8, section 1401 wrote:The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.


Note Clause A. That fact that it mentions citizens born within the United States as natural born citizens shows that the following clauses also define natural born citizen.

Now note Clause C. Senator McCain was born to two U.S. citizens, and they had a permanent residence either in the U.S. or the military base they were stationed in (outlying possession).

Therefore, Senator McCain is a natural born citizen and is eligible for the Presidency of the United States.

I really hope I cleared that all up.[/b]
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
User avatar
Cook Hologram
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Armpit of America

Postby DaGip on Thu Mar 06, 2008 1:34 am

Hologram wrote:Alright Gip, pay very close attention. A natural born citizen is a citizen at birth.

Article II, section i:United States Constitution wrote:No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.


With that pretext we move on to the next argument:

US Code, Title 8, section 1401 wrote:The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.


Note Clause A. That fact that it mentions citizens born within the United States as natural born citizens shows that the following clauses also define natural born citizen.

Now note Clause C. Senator McCain was born to two U.S. citizens, and they had a permanent residence either in the U.S. or the military base they were stationed in (outlying possession).

Therefore, Senator McCain is a natural born citizen and is eligible for the Presidency of the United States.

I really hope I cleared that all up.[/b]


McCain is a citizen of the United States, I do not disagree with you, but the question is,"Is John McCain a natural-born citizen?" Off the cuff, it has been said that he is, but it has never been seen in court. And if you have to go to court over your own citizenship, that means that you are not a natural-born citizen but a naturalized citizen of the United States at birth. They are two different things. One is undisputed citizenship without further issue by right of naturally being born on American soil, and the other confers or grants citizenship barring certain criteria is met, in which in such cases the individual is decalred a naturalized citizen at birth.

Just by McCain having to go to court over this issue would be enough to prove that he is not a Natural Born Citizen, as a Natural Born Citizen does not have to go to court over such things!

I don't know why this doesn't make sense to you?

If it doesn't go to court, then there is no problem, but if it does, it is bad for McCain, because that is all that is really needed to show that he is indeed not a natural-born citizen.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby Hologram on Thu Mar 06, 2008 1:45 am

DaGip wrote:
Hologram wrote:Alright Gip, pay very close attention. A natural born citizen is a citizen at birth.

Article II, section i:United States Constitution wrote:No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.


With that pretext we move on to the next argument:

US Code, Title 8, section 1401 wrote:The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.


Note Clause A. That fact that it mentions citizens born within the United States as natural born citizens shows that the following clauses also define natural born citizen.

Now note Clause C. Senator McCain was born to two U.S. citizens, and they had a permanent residence either in the U.S. or the military base they were stationed in (outlying possession).

Therefore, Senator McCain is a natural born citizen and is eligible for the Presidency of the United States.

I really hope I cleared that all up.[/b]


McCain is a citizen of the United States, I do not disagree with you, but the question is,"Is John McCain a natural-born citizen?" Off the cuff, it has been said that he is, but it has never been seen in court. And if you have to go to court over your own citizenship, that means that you are not a natural-born citizen but a naturalized citizen of the United States at birth. They are two different things. One is undisputed citizenship without further issue by right of naturally being born on American soil, and the other confers or grants citizenship barring certain criteria is met, in which in such cases the individual is decalred a naturalized citizen at birth.

Just by McCain having to go to court over this issue would be enough to prove that he is not a Natural Born Citizen, as a Natural Born Citizen does not have to go to court over such things!

I don't know why this doesn't make sense to you?

If it doesn't go to court, then there is no problem, but if it does, it is bad for McCain, because that is all that is really needed to show that he is indeed not a natural-born citizen.
That fact that he's going to court doesn't mean anything about his natural citizenship. It just means he needs the courts to clear up the law to say whether or not he was indeed a natural born citizen. Also, a naturalized citizen at birth is the exact same thing as a natural born citizen. It's what the name implies. All people born in the U.S. are naturalized citizens at birth and are therefore natural born citizens, and I'm sure that the federal courts will agree with me on this issue.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
User avatar
Cook Hologram
 
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:49 pm
Location: Armpit of America

Postby DaGip on Thu Mar 06, 2008 2:08 am

Hologram wrote:
DaGip wrote:
Hologram wrote:Alright Gip, pay very close attention. A natural born citizen is a citizen at birth.

Article II, section i:United States Constitution wrote:No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.


With that pretext we move on to the next argument:

US Code, Title 8, section 1401 wrote:The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;
(c) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person;
(d) a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the birth of such person, and the other of whom is a national, but not a citizen of the United States;
(e) a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;
(f) a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States;
(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States, or periods of employment with the United States Government or with an international organization as that term is defined in section 288 of title 22 by such citizen parent, or any periods during which such citizen parent is physically present abroad as the dependent unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person
(A) honorably serving with the Armed Forces of the United States, or
(B) employed by the United States Government or an international organization as defined in section 288 of title 22, may be included in order to satisfy the physical-presence requirement of this paragraph. This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date; and
(h) a person born before noon (Eastern Standard Time) May 24, 1934, outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a mother who is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, had resided in the United States.


Note Clause A. That fact that it mentions citizens born within the United States as natural born citizens shows that the following clauses also define natural born citizen.

Now note Clause C. Senator McCain was born to two U.S. citizens, and they had a permanent residence either in the U.S. or the military base they were stationed in (outlying possession).

Therefore, Senator McCain is a natural born citizen and is eligible for the Presidency of the United States.

I really hope I cleared that all up.[/b]


McCain is a citizen of the United States, I do not disagree with you, but the question is,"Is John McCain a natural-born citizen?" Off the cuff, it has been said that he is, but it has never been seen in court. And if you have to go to court over your own citizenship, that means that you are not a natural-born citizen but a naturalized citizen of the United States at birth. They are two different things. One is undisputed citizenship without further issue by right of naturally being born on American soil, and the other confers or grants citizenship barring certain criteria is met, in which in such cases the individual is decalred a naturalized citizen at birth.

Just by McCain having to go to court over this issue would be enough to prove that he is not a Natural Born Citizen, as a Natural Born Citizen does not have to go to court over such things!

I don't know why this doesn't make sense to you?

If it doesn't go to court, then there is no problem, but if it does, it is bad for McCain, because that is all that is really needed to show that he is indeed not a natural-born citizen.
That fact that he's going to court doesn't mean anything about his natural citizenship. It just means he needs the courts to clear up the law to say whether or not he was indeed a natural born citizen. Also, a naturalized citizen at birth is the exact same thing as a natural born citizen. It's what the name implies. All people born in the U.S. are naturalized citizens at birth and are therefore natural born citizens, and I'm sure that the federal courts will agree with me on this issue.


If you were born within the 50 States, you are considered a natural-born citizen, but if you are born in Germany (and your parents were American) then you are a naturalized citizen, there is a difference between the two. They sound similar, but legally they are two different terms. McCain is only being assumed to be a natural-born citizen, but it hasn't gone to court (and it may never go to court). If it doesn't go to court, then that is a plus for McCain's natural born status, but if it does go to court, I believe McCain will have a tough go of it (I know he has already got a bunch of lawyers ready to go to court if he has to over this issue). If he does go to court, it will be a learning experience for everyone on what exactly does a natural born citizen entail.

I think the problem arises because the founding father's planned a more Libertarian-style government, and they didn't envision us being all over the planet the way we are today. If anyone deserves natural-born status, it's McCain (I am still not going to vote for the old fucker) :wink:
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby greenoaks on Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:56 am

DaGip wrote:
Tyr wrote:does anyone realize that a natural born citizen is also a person born of two american parents where ever they are


Natural born citizens are citizens that are born within the 50 states and need NO special laws or guidelines to be or become a citizen of the United States. You are either a Natural Born Citizen or you are a Naturalized Citizen under United States law.

That means Ron Paul can legally become president because his existence needs NO specialized laws to citizenship, whereas, Mr. MadDog McCain is a citizen under such guidelines that allow him to be a NATURLIZED CITIZEN. Natural Born Citizen and Naturlized Citizen are not the same thing, sorry. Do your research.

The argument still holds weight, sorry Jimboston :wink:

your argument holds no wait DaGip because of the US constitution and your lack of understanding of the terms 'natural born' and 'naturalized'.

A naturalized citizen is someone who was not born on US soil and was not born to US parents but has lived in the US for a required number of years.

You are theorizing that because McCain was born in the Canal Zone, he was not actually qualified to be president. However, it should be noted that section 1403 was written to apply to a small group of people to whom section 1401 did not apply. McCain is a natural-born citizen under 8 USC 1401(c): "a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person."
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users