Moderator: Community Team
Tyr wrote:Skittles! wrote:Tyr wrote:saved europe twice spread democracy helps the needy and generally does good things. no america means no french revolution means no democratic europe and so on and so on
You don't honestly believe you 'spread democracy', right? Your form of democracy isn't even proper democracy! You did not spread it, you invaded a country and made it democratic!
You 'saved' Europe with the help of Europe and other countries. You did not 'save' it single-handed.
Erm, you seem to be forgetting that there was a democratic Europe even before the French Revolution happened.
oh i forgot how much the french helped in world war 2 my fault and how many democracies would exist if not for americas example? how are we not a "proper democracy" we elect leaders and they govern thats what democracy is
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:Tyr wrote:Skittles! wrote:Tyr wrote:saved europe twice spread democracy helps the needy and generally does good things. no america means no french revolution means no democratic europe and so on and so on
You don't honestly believe you 'spread democracy', right? Your form of democracy isn't even proper democracy! You did not spread it, you invaded a country and made it democratic!
You 'saved' Europe with the help of Europe and other countries. You did not 'save' it single-handed.
Erm, you seem to be forgetting that there was a democratic Europe even before the French Revolution happened.
oh i forgot how much the french helped in world war 2 my fault and how many democracies would exist if not for americas example? how are we not a "proper democracy" we elect leaders and they govern thats what democracy is
You also seemed to forget that the Soviet Union, Canada, Australia and many other countries helped in the 'saving' of Europe in WWII.
There would still be many democracies in the world even if there wasn't an 'example' by the US of A. You give people a choice to vote, and so it is skewered as not every has voted. It also makes it liable to be rigged. Democracies make people vote, not give them a choice. Everyone gets a say, and people expect a say.
Tyr wrote:the french would not have thought democracy if not for americas example
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:Tyr wrote:the french would not have thought democracy if not for americas example
You seem to be forgetting that the reason the French Revolution happened was not because America was "spreading democracy", but because Peasants and such were sick of the gloating Kings and Queens.
Carebian Knight wrote:I'm with you Tyr, America is fine, it's not perfect but it's the best country in the world right now. We're doing the most throughout the world(not talking about military) is anybody here from Iraq? Most people in Iraq are thankful that we came in and toppled their dictator. It's mostly the people who are in the countries that are fighting the war that are bitching.
Carebian Knight wrote:Skittles! wrote:Tyr wrote:the french would not have thought democracy if not for americas example
You seem to be forgetting that the reason the French Revolution happened was not because America was "spreading democracy", but because Peasants and such were sick of the gloating Kings and Queens.
Yes but the idea to set up a democracy came from the American Revolution.
Neutrino wrote:Carebian Knight wrote:I'm with you Tyr, America is fine, it's not perfect but it's the best country in the world right now. We're doing the most throughout the world(not talking about military) is anybody here from Iraq? Most people in Iraq are thankful that we came in and toppled their dictator. It's mostly the people who are in the countries that are fighting the war that are bitching.
Tyr wrote:if america hadnt invaded iraq people would butch next time a couple thousand kurds got gassed and we did nothing
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Carebian Knight wrote:Last I checked you had to register to vote, I think that means you have a choice.
Who took Omaha beach on D-Day against a seasoned German Division? America
Tyr wrote:hats all i got till tommorow
god bless america and bring death to her enemys
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Neutrino wrote:Carebian Knight wrote:Last I checked you had to register to vote, I think that means you have a choice.
Who took Omaha beach on D-Day against a seasoned German Division? America
Who lost 60 000 troops in one day? The British. Who held off the Luftwaffe? The British. Who stopped German's advance in the East? The Russians.
Le's just throw around pointless examples, shall we?
Without any of the major Allied powers, the Axis probably would have won the war. It's pointless to claim "we rescued Europe" because it would have been just as screwed if the US had entered the war but Britian or Russia didn't.
got tonkaed wrote:there are some very misinformed american perspectives in this thread. However as far as the op mentions, we will probably be involved in the middle east as long as either of these two conditions persist
1) America is a world power capable of protecting its economic interests
2) There are assets necessary to the consumption economy America wants at a lower cost.
These are not necessarily good or bad things, they just are. On the one hand, every nation that could do such a thing, can and is doing such a thing, no nation is a saint. However, there are terrible costs to such intervention, and usually the costs are understated. When people look at these issues of moving forward or taking actions, the costs are rarely if ever heard.
Bigfalcon65 wrote:Neutrino wrote:Carebian Knight wrote:Last I checked you had to register to vote, I think that means you have a choice.
Who took Omaha beach on D-Day against a seasoned German Division? America
Who lost 60 000 troops in one day? The British. Who held off the Luftwaffe? The British. Who stopped German's advance in the East? The Russians.
Le's just throw around pointless examples, shall we?
Without any of the major Allied powers, the Axis probably would have won the war. It's pointless to claim "we rescued Europe" because it would have been just as screwed if the US had entered the war but Britian or Russia didn't.
thats true and if it wernt for the russians being SOOO big than germany wouldt of had to fight a 2 side war which is why they lost so you owe alot to russia
Neutrino wrote:Carebian Knight wrote:Last I checked you had to register to vote, I think that means you have a choice.
Who took Omaha beach on D-Day against a seasoned German Division? America
Who lost 60 000 troops in one day? The British. Who held off the Luftwaffe? The British. Who stopped German's advance in the East? The Russians.
Le's just throw around pointless examples, shall we?
Without any of the major Allied powers, the Axis probably would have won the war. It's pointless to claim "we rescued Europe" because it would have been just as screwed if the US had entered the war but Britian or Russia didn't.
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap