Kupo666 wrote:HoustonNutt wrote:Kupo666 wrote:Death only affects the body- whatever the mind thinks, and the soul believes, will happen. If you believe in heaven, you'll go there. If you believe in hell, you'll go there. If you believe in nothingness, that's what will happen.
This is the least plausible explanation I have ever heard. What if I believe that I go to a nude beach in Tahiti and have perma-erection?
What makes it implausible? If you believed in heaven, and that was your heaven, then that's where you would go if you considered yourself to be going to heaven. And how exactly would you know anything about what happens to someone after they die? It's not really possible to predict anything about what happens, so again, what makes my idea implausible?
First, it's circular. If you believe in heaven and you go to a place similar to what you believed, then you are in heaven. This doesn't really say anything. Second, it completely ignores the alternate possibilities, including a person believing in heaven, dying, and being nothing but worm food. Or a person NOT believing and then be pleasantly (or unpleasantly) surprised upon death.
Basically, your explanation is implausible because (a) it's a pointless, circular bit of sophistry, and (b) instead of using ANY of the dichotomous outcomes (person believes and is right, person believes and is wrong), you circumvent all of them with some Pollyanna bullshit about "whatever you believe is what happens." By your very definition, if someone believed that place X was heaven and another person believed that place X was hell and a third believed that place X didn't even exist, ALL of them would be right. This is impossible. Besides, under any religious rubric, failure to believe in an afterlife does not give one no afterlife; rather, depending on the benevolence of your God, it either condemns the person to a lesser place or does not affect his getting into heaven.
"Look, Chalmers, let's understand each other... I don't like you."