Moderator: Community Team
mpjh wrote:Read the post.
Napoleon Ier wrote:I know a fervent atheist who absolutely refuses to believe evolution. Clever person too.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri, snorri... where's that famous open mind of yours, eh? Why the intellectual fascism?
Snorri1234 wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri, snorri... where's that famous open mind of yours, eh? Why the intellectual fascism?
What on earth would any atheist believe in if it wasn't evolution?
mpjh wrote:I don't see any need to wait to take up the fact that evolution is how live on earth originated and developed.
Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Napoleon Ier wrote:Snorri, snorri... where's that famous open mind of yours, eh? Why the intellectual fascism?
What on earth would any atheist believe in if it wasn't evolution?
That we're still waiting for a biological Galileo, just like Dawkins still thinks we need to wait for a cosmological Darwin.
Frigidus wrote:We need to advertise this thread or something, get some new blood in here. Jay did his part, but he isn't an intellectual Rambo. We need more people on the other side of the argument! Same goes for the evolution thread.
Lev306 wrote:Evolution makes sense, life can form from un-organic life, blah blah blah but how do we explain the formation of the universe? Sure we have the big bang theory, but what formed the big bang? Why can't there have been an intelligent creator that designed a universal law and system that eventually formed into what we know now?
mpjh wrote:Those are not the only possibilities. It is possible that life began on this planet of its own accord. There is interesting work that hypothesizes that DNA, and subsequently life, developed from naturally occuring chemicals between the layers of mica stone. Chemicals and stone to life.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
Lev306 wrote:I like to play devil's advocate(noticed the pun?) so I'll take the pro-creator side for now.
I skipped 290 pages so I might have missed something, but here goes anyway:
Evolution makes sense, life can form from un-organic life, blah blah blah but how do we explain the formation of the universe? Sure we have the big bang theory, but what formed the big bang? Why can't there have been an intelligent creator that designed a universal law and system that eventually formed into what we know now?
jonesthecurl wrote:"Do forgive me if I'm wrong. But isn't that a load of old bollocks?"
Mel Smith
mpjh wrote:Lev306 wrote:
Science is all about the quest for answers to the unknown, and the process has been accelerating ever since the Arabs invented Algebra.
Snorri1234 wrote:mpjh wrote:Those are not the only possibilities. It is possible that life began on this planet of its own accord. There is interesting work that hypothesizes that DNA, and subsequently life, developed from naturally occuring chemicals between the layers of mica stone. Chemicals and stone to life.
I think that was implied in B. Or at least, it is a theory for the origin of life about the same as B.
Exactly how it happened is up for debate, but one must note that that has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. Origin of life is not a part of the theory.
Napoleon Ier wrote:mpjh wrote:Lev306 wrote:
Science is all about the quest for answers to the unknown, and the process has been accelerating ever since the Arabs invented Algebra.
They really didn't.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users