Conquer Club

Nebraska Mall Shootings

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby Nobunaga on Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:05 pm

UCAbears wrote:
moomaster2000 wrote:Cmon for real... On average 6744 die each day in America...

And 10 people a day are murdered...

It's not a big deal because you live there.


It doesn't matter. It's never a joking matter when ANYONE dies. Except for those who kill others and take their own lives.


... He should've skipped part one an just moved onto the last part.

... Crazy white boy just got fired from McDonalds and broke up with his girlfriend.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Nobunaga
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Postby Heimdall on Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:07 pm

UCAbears wrote:
Heimdall wrote:
UCAbears wrote:Except for those who kill others and take their own lives.


Which is the case here


Wrong. People are dead because of someone else.


:?:

Isn't that what i said? The guy killed others and then took his own life.
User avatar
Lieutenant Heimdall
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:44 pm
Location: Vancouver!

Postby Nobunaga on Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:08 pm

... Used his step-dad's rifle.

...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Nobunaga
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Postby Skittles! on Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:10 pm

soundout9 wrote:I am against death.

Good luck for when you're old then.
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby Neutrino on Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:35 pm

UCA, if you are prepared to complain about others cracking jokes because people in a part of the world severely opposite to theirs have died, then you should always be against jokes because you can be sure, someone, somewhere has just died violently.

Just because there was a lot of them at once dosen't make it any more worthy of your sympathy than 10 people dying seperately.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Corporal Neutrino
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Postby UCAbears on Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:02 pm

Neutrino wrote:UCA, if you are prepared to complain about others cracking jokes because people in a part of the world severely opposite to theirs have died, then you should always be against jokes because you can be sure, someone, somewhere has just died violently.

Just because there was a lot of them at once dosen't make it any more worthy of your sympathy than 10 people dying seperately.


They are making jokes in a thread about the people who died. There is a difference. If they want to make jokes, don't make them about some people who did nothing wrong to die. And in a different thread.
User avatar
Cook UCAbears
 
Posts: 3199
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Madagascar

Postby Skittles! on Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:03 pm

Many people don't do things wrong and then they die. You can't stop it from happening.
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14575
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby Heimdall on Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:20 pm

Going Xmas shopping is a killer...

I'll make it my excuse for not buying any gifts this year. :P
User avatar
Lieutenant Heimdall
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:44 pm
Location: Vancouver!

Postby Neutrino on Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:25 pm

UCAbears wrote:
They are making jokes in a thread about the people who died. There is a difference. If they want to make jokes, don't make them about some people who did nothing wrong to die. And in a different thread.


Why do these particular 10 people deserve a thread? Hundreds of people die daily, and they get nothing. The only reason you care about these people is because they were Westerners.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Corporal Neutrino
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Postby Hitman079 on Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:26 pm

moomaster2000 wrote:i knows where it is.

It's in the middle of nowhere.

And to all you Nebraskans, Ill cook my corn the way I want to.

my god, this guy flames every country/state/province/island/peninsula eh?
User avatar
Cook Hitman079
 
Posts: 2986
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Tied up in your basement

Postby moomaster2000 on Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:29 pm

Especially ones invested with thai people =D
Image
User avatar
Corporal moomaster2000
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Encinitas, CA

Postby UCAbears on Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:38 pm

Neutrino wrote:
UCAbears wrote:
They are making jokes in a thread about the people who died. There is a difference. If they want to make jokes, don't make them about some people who did nothing wrong to die. And in a different thread.


Why do these particular 10 people deserve a thread? Hundreds of people die daily, and they get nothing. The only reason you care about these people is because they were Westerners.



Just that it was something I heard about and yes it was in my country.
User avatar
Cook UCAbears
 
Posts: 3199
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Madagascar

Postby Iliad on Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:11 am

this brings up a good point. Why do 9 deaths in America get huge covering while in other countreis tehre are people murdered every day?
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby moomaster2000 on Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:12 am

Because...
U.S.A. Number 1.
Image
User avatar
Corporal moomaster2000
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Encinitas, CA

Postby Coleman on Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:27 am

I knew Robbie Hawkings, he went to our church. And I know his family, or his step-family I guess you'd say and have known them a long time. Candice his step mother is, was, a really close friend of mine until this past year but I'm not going to go into that.

I'm not rational today and I'm not going to be posting tomorrow or playing my games or anything else. All I can think of is when we were on a winter retreat with my church and he tried to choke me to death and only stopped because of how many people were around. I'm wondering if his face was the same then as when he was shooting those people.

I'm out. You guys keep posting your bull shit.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby comic boy on Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:59 am

Hopefully some good will come out of this if a few more Americans support more stringent gun control.
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
Brigadier comic boy
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Postby Neutrino on Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:57 am

One can always hope that eventually someone in power will get the point.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Corporal Neutrino
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Postby The Factory on Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:44 am

comic boy wrote:Hopefully some good will come out of this if a few more Americans support more stringent gun control.


Stricter gun laws won't accomplish much, if anything it will just make more dangerous weapons (fully automatic assault rifles, etc.) more easily accessible via illegal arms dealers. Believe me, if you talk to the right people you can get yourself an AK-47 for around $200 where I'm from. The worst part is that weapons dealers already operate beyond the restrictions of the law so they don't care who they sell weapons to be it a child or a a felon with an extensive history of violent acts on other people.
:|
User avatar
Corporal The Factory
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: The Great Northwest

Postby Dancing Mustard on Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:09 am

soundout9 wrote:I am against death.
So is Ron Paul.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!

Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Corporal Dancing Mustard
 
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Postby sangfroid on Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:22 am

The Factory wrote:Stricter gun laws won't accomplish much, if anything it will just make more dangerous weapons (fully automatic assault rifles, etc.) more easily accessible via illegal arms dealers.


Of course stricter gun laws won't accomplish much, the laws don't need to be changed and kids can keep on dying because after all, they're only kids and who cares about them. Let's just ignore the situation and see how many more people die because of our eagerness to do nothing!! :roll:
User avatar
Sergeant sangfroid
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:51 am
Location: Kent, U.K.

Postby The Factory on Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:05 am

sangfroid wrote:
The Factory wrote:Stricter gun laws won't accomplish much, if anything it will just make more dangerous weapons (fully automatic assault rifles, etc.) more easily accessible via illegal arms dealers.


Of course stricter gun laws won't accomplish much, the laws don't need to be changed and kids can keep on dying because after all, they're only kids and who cares about them. Let's just ignore the situation and see how many more people die because of our eagerness to do nothing!! :roll:


No, we should completely restrict the right to own weapons and let kids obtain them from and simultaneously fund illegal arms traders and gangs, therefore giving gangs greater leverage through a greater source of income generated by the higher demand for weapons caused by their illegality THEN we let them die, because after all, they're only kids and who cares about them. :roll:
:|
User avatar
Corporal The Factory
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: The Great Northwest

Postby Freetymes on Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:56 am

In this case gun laws would not solve a thing. This kid was out to be famous and would not have thought twice if (that) his use of a gun was illegal. He broke many laws that do exist and they were no deterrent.

Of course this brings out the emotional response of "We have to outlaw guns to save these people!!!"
Sadly even with the extremely stiff gun laws in the UK they have skyrocketing violent crime issues and gangs rule in the inner cities.

If it is a gun control debate you seek though...

The reality is that if there had been a law abiding person with a concealed carry weapons permit, and the afore mentioned Mall did not have a weapons (criminal) free zone then much if not all of these horrible deaths could well have been stopped.

There are literally 100's of gun laws and restrictions (in my state the annotated gun laws fill a single volume consisting of over 80 pages) and just as all of the prohibition type laws they are poorly enforced, judges are overly lenient, and it creates a thriving illegal market.

Look at the stats and facts. In virtually all of the states in the US that have created "Shall issue" concealed weapon permits, the violent crime rates have dropped dramatically and there are 1000's of cases nation wide where these permit holders have saved lives.

Strict gun laws already exist and instead of making more, those that exist should be VERY strictly enforced and there should be little to no chance for leniency! Add that to the fact that as a felon you may be up against a well trained armed "Victim" and you add a very personal and immediate deterrent to the above strict law actions. Guns are illegal in many countries but they still exist. Outlawing something is not a solution!
TheProwler wrote:I concede.
Image
Just this once.
User avatar
Lieutenant Freetymes
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:48 am
Location: Tracking down that 10 point I saw last Saturday.

Postby comic boy on Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:13 am

Freetymes wrote:In this case gun laws would not solve a thing. This kid was out to be famous and would not have thought twice if (that) his use of a gun was illegal. He broke many laws that do exist and they were no deterrent.

Of course this brings out the emotional response of "We have to outlaw guns to save these people!!!"
Sadly even with the extremely stiff gun laws in the UK they have skyrocketing violent crime issues and gangs rule in the inner cities.

If it is a gun control debate you seek though...

The reality is that if there had been a law abiding person with a concealed carry weapons permit, and the afore mentioned Mall did not have a weapons (criminal) free zone then much if not all of these horrible deaths could well have been stopped.

There are literally 100's of gun laws and restrictions (in my state the annotated gun laws fill a single volume consisting of over 80 pages) and just as all of the prohibition type laws they are poorly enforced, judges are overly lenient, and it creates a thriving illegal market.

Look at the stats and facts. In virtually all of the states in the US that have created "Shall issue" concealed weapon permits, the violent crime rates have dropped dramatically and there are 1000's of cases nation wide where these permit holders have saved lives.

Strict gun laws already exist and instead of making more, those that exist should be VERY strictly enforced and there should be little to no chance for leniency! Add that to the fact that as a felon you may be up against a well trained armed "Victim" and you add a very personal and immediate deterrent to the above strict law actions. Guns are illegal in many countries but they still exist. Outlawing something is not a solution!


Not true
Violent crime is not sky - rocketing in the UK and violent gangs do not rule the inner cities. Gun crime is up slightly but tends to be is very marginalised, shootings are rare enough to be newsworthy still which can hardly be said of the USA. Whether it is lack of controls or poor enforcement I dont know but something needs to be done, no point hand wringing after every tragedy and doing nothing.
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
Brigadier comic boy
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Postby Guiscard on Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:38 am

Freetymes wrote:In this case gun laws would not solve a thing. This kid was out to be famous and would not have thought twice if (that) his use of a gun was illegal. He broke many laws that do exist and they were no deterrent.

Of course this brings out the emotional response of "We have to outlaw guns to save these people!!!"
Sadly even with the extremely stiff gun laws in the UK they have skyrocketing violent crime issues and gangs rule in the inner cities.

If it is a gun control debate you seek though...

The reality is that if there had been a law abiding person with a concealed carry weapons permit, and the afore mentioned Mall did not have a weapons (criminal) free zone then much if not all of these horrible deaths could well have been stopped.

There are literally 100's of gun laws and restrictions (in my state the annotated gun laws fill a single volume consisting of over 80 pages) and just as all of the prohibition type laws they are poorly enforced, judges are overly lenient, and it creates a thriving illegal market.

Look at the stats and facts. In virtually all of the states in the US that have created "Shall issue" concealed weapon permits, the violent crime rates have dropped dramatically and there are 1000's of cases nation wide where these permit holders have saved lives.

Strict gun laws already exist and instead of making more, those that exist should be VERY strictly enforced and there should be little to no chance for leniency! Add that to the fact that as a felon you may be up against a well trained armed "Victim" and you add a very personal and immediate deterrent to the above strict law actions. Guns are illegal in many countries but they still exist. Outlawing something is not a solution!


As hard as I tried here in the UK, I doubt I could get hold of a gun unless a) I had fairly shady connections in the estates or b) I was the son of a farmer.

Stricter gun laws in the UK mean that gun ownership is simply very rare. It might not happen straight away, not for a generation, but in the long term it will do you good. A lot of my grandparents generation got rid of firearms they may well have had in various amnesties because the penalties for illegal ownership were severe. Its a trickle down effect. By introducing stricter legislation you gradually decrease the gun culture. It DOESN'T go over to the illegal market to a massive degree. It means that kids like this one and the guy at Virginia Tech don't have access to guns straight away.

Its gun culture that needs dealing with. Its a terrible thing and I am truly sorry you in the US are afflicted with such a lust for what are necessarily and by design objects used specifically to kill human beings.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby autoload on Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:48 am

Coleman wrote:I knew Robbie Hawkings...All I can think of is when we were on a winter retreat with my church and he tried to choke me to death and only stopped because of how many people were around. I'm wondering if his face was the same then as when he was shooting those people...


Rage is nothing to be trifled with. Maybe someday people will get the hint and start treating others like human beings so shit like this don't happen so often.
User avatar
Major autoload
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users