Strife wrote:Gregrios wrote:riggable wrote:What do you mean, gregrios, by "you won't get to where you desire"?
this is at the end of your new statement for us to think about.
Where we end up is dead. Thinking anything else is delusional. Perhaps people desire to end up dead, but this is not the case for most of the population. Furthermore, your analogy is completely black and white. A problem in life = a step. You solve the problem and you go up the step. However, you can totally fail at fixing a problem and still go through life. For instance, someone who is in a war and gets their leg blown off. THis is a severe problem in life, in your analogy, this would be 'missing a step'
however, this person doesn't fall down. this person doesn't necesserily not get to where he or she desires, its just a problem that won't get resolved.
Whatever man. I've already explained it to you. I beleive there's no winning this debate. So, I'll just throw up the white towel at you.
Because this message wasn't intended for a narrow minded person like yourself.
Peace out, brother.
Why did you swallow the white towel in the first place?

I gave up because he thinks for some reason that I want him to beleive what I'm saying. Realality is that all I want is him and everybody to understand it.
It doesn't matter if you agree with my beliefs or not.
You don't have to beleive in what I'm saying inorder to understand it.
Wow, that's sort of the same theory I used with the whole Hilary Clinton debate.
Basically what I'm saying is:
I don't expect non-beleivers to beleive in what I'm saying. But how can you not understand it?
This message ONLY applies to the lives of beleivers of God.
I expect some profound statement from "whats his name", but I'll tell you right now, I'm moving on. I explained all I can. Except it or don't. It's entirely up to the reader.