Moderator: Community Team
betiko wrote:mrswdk wrote:Tulsi Gabbard is mighty fine.
yes. any video of her performing some hawaiian dances?
2dimes wrote:Usually after around 26, eww.
saxitoxin wrote:betiko wrote:i just don't understand you guys. regardless of your political stand point.... how can you be ok with your president using his presidential status for his own profits and to rig the next elections through foreign governments? how on earth can you be ok with that? Is he your uncle or something and you have to defend him whatever he does? Do you really think no one from the GOP could be a better president than this guy? this is really fascinating.
Well he didn't and even if did this is an exceptional situation that requires decisive action by the President. We are in a battle against a domestic enemy that seeks to subvert the nation; the constitution is not a suicide pact.
betiko wrote:mrswdk wrote:Tulsi Gabbard is mighty fine.
yes. any video of her performing some hawaiian dances?
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
Evil Semp wrote:saxitoxin wrote:betiko wrote:i just don't understand you guys. regardless of your political stand point.... how can you be ok with your president using his presidential status for his own profits and to rig the next elections through foreign governments? how on earth can you be ok with that? Is he your uncle or something and you have to defend him whatever he does? Do you really think no one from the GOP could be a better president than this guy? this is really fascinating.
Well he didn't and even if did this is an exceptional situation that requires decisive action by the President. We are in a battle against a domestic enemy that seeks to subvert the nation; the constitution is not a suicide pact.
Decisive action? Why did it take three years to be so decisive? And by the way he did.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
mrswdk wrote:2dimes wrote:Usually after around 26, eww.
lol.
a) As if anyone your age is going to turn down a 30 year-old
b) The womens usually stay pretty foxy well into their 30s IMO
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
HitRed wrote:I never would have voted to impeach Obama for the same things.
HitRed wrote:agreeint with yourself doesn't make your assumptions true.
The best way to lose to Trump is to underestimate him.
mrswdk wrote:Tulsi Gabbard is mighty fine.
saxitoxin wrote:President Trump was impeached in a narrow, partisan vote by the slimy DemocRats' conspiring in their steamy and odorous House of Representatives.
The august United States Senate has announced they will find him not guilty by acclamation and completely exonerate him of all charges shortly following a fair and speedy, three-minute trial (which is three minutes longer than this silliness warrants). Meanwhile, CNBC reports that Moody's Analytics has issued a predictive model that shows Trump will be "easily" re-elected in 2020.
jimboston wrote:The title of your thread is factually incorrect. Please fix it.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:jimboston wrote:The title of your thread is factually incorrect. Please fix it.
Doesn't the House have to send the Articles over to the Senate for Impeachment to be Official and Final?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:jimboston wrote:The title of your thread is factually incorrect. Please fix it.
Doesn't the House have to send the Articles over to the Senate for Impeachment to be Official and Final?
Correct. One of the Rats' lawyers has even said as much.
mrswdk wrote:Such a dumb move by the Dems attempting to impeach. Congress is controlled by the Republicans and so there was a 0% chance this would actually work, and there's no chance they'll make any political gains from this either.
mrswdk wrote:The US has a superior political system to China though.
Dukasaur wrote:mrswdk wrote:Such a dumb move by the Dems attempting to impeach. Congress is controlled by the Republicans and so there was a 0% chance this would actually work, and there's no chance they'll make any political gains from this either.
I don't think they had any choice. Trump's crimes are just so in-your-face blatant, the Dems were constantly under fire for not stepping up and doing something to stop him. I think they knew it was a doomed effort, but they just couldn't throw up their hands and not try.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Users browsing this forum: No registered users