Supreme Court Role- Wait for a white President?

[saxitoxin]

and the Democrats killed Hitler.

Democrats didn't kill Hitler. He killed himself when the Russians started breathing down his neck.

Russians were helped by the U.S. with lots of aid during the war. If we didn't helped the Russians, it would of been Patton and his tanks that would of rolled into Berlin. Yes, and Hitler would of killed himself anyways.

The U.S. was helped by Russia. A small shipment of busted American rifles and used underwear isn't the equivalent of 20 million dead, and the wild-eyed, flag-waving frenzy you've worked yourself up into doesn't make you the savior of the world, Bernie. Even the Japanese make fun of you for it -

... between 1941 and 1942 only 7% of the wartime cargo shipped from the US made it to the Soviet Union. The bulk of the weapons and other materials arrived in the Soviet Union in 1944-1945, once the winds of war had decisively shifted.

http://orientalreview.org/2015/05/12/ww ... -enough-i/

[tzor]

Tzor hates racism, who would of thought?

See what happens when you actually think? You might learn a thing or two.

I'm a Roman Catholic. You know those guys with white hoods running around in the south and promoting the Democratic Party? Well they lynched blacks and papists. "Papist" is a traditional insult for Roman Catholics. Yes I absolutely hate racism. Racial stereotypes are flat out evil.

I mean just because this 6' 2" person can't jump doesn't mean all White Folks can't jump.

[saxitoxin]

I can take any period of history and it's the Democrats who are flat out racists.

I'm a Roman Catholic.

Therefore, by tzor's logic, he's an Anti-Semite.

The 16th to 18th centuries were the most sorrowful and degrading period in the history of the Jews in Catholic Europe. The introduction of ghettos and "Jews-streets," in the sense of compulsory places of residence for Jews only, spread rapidly in the 16th century. The Jewish badge was enforced everywhere, and Jewish socioeconomic activity was strictly regulated. Blood libels were frequent, especially in Poland.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jso ... 04300.html

[tzor]

Therefore, by tzor's logic, he's an Anti-Semite.

I'm not a European. Look at what happened to the Church in Europe. Most of the true holders of the church tradition these days comes from ... Africa.

[saxitoxin]

Therefore, by tzor's logic, he's an Anti-Semite.

I'm not a European.

So? By the same logic of historic guilt that people who are Democrats in 2016 are racist because of Woodrow Wilson, you're an Anti-Semite because of Pius V.

You've made a choice to be a member of an Anti-Semitic club and you're choosing to remain a member, even though you can choose to quit the club anytime you like and join a different club that doesn't have an Anti-Semitic past, like the Unitarian Church or AAA. (In fact, you're choosing to remain a member of an Anti-Semitic club even though non Anti-Semitic clubs like AAA offer superior benefits like free towing.)

[Bernie Sanders]

Therefore, by tzor's logic, he's an Anti-Semite.

I'm not a European.

So? By the same logic of historic guilt that people who are Democrats in 2016 are racist because of Woodrow Wilson, you're an Anti-Semite because of Pius V.

You've made a choice to be a member of an Anti-Semitic club and you're choosing to remain a member, even though you can choose to quit the club anytime you like and join a different club that doesn't have an Anti-Semitic past, like the Unitarian Church or AAA. (In fact, you're choosing to remain a member of an Anti-Semitic club even though non Anti-Semitic clubs like AAA offer superior benefits like free towing.)

I agree with Saxitoxin....hopefully the last time tho.....

[tzor]

So? By the same logic of historic guilt that people who are Democrats in 2016 are racist because of Woodrow Wilson, you're an Anti-Semite because of Pius V.

That's stupid.

1. Woodrow Wilson didn't make other Democrats racist.
2. Pius V was not an Anti-Semite

Personally, an Anti-Semite like yourself should not be throwing accusations of Antisemitism at people who clearly aren't.

[saxitoxin]

So? By the same logic of historic guilt that people who are Democrats in 2016 are racist because of Woodrow Wilson, you're an Anti-Semite because of Pius V.

That's stupid.

1. Woodrow Wilson didn't make other Democrats racist.
2. Pius V was not an Anti-Semite

Personally, an Anti-Semite like yourself should not be throwing accusations of Antisemitism at people who clearly aren't.

You cited past incidences of racism within the Democratic Party dating from the 1860s to 1960s to argue that the Democratic Party is currently a racist organization and that its current members are, therefore, also racist.

By your same logic, past incidences of anti-Semitism within the Catholic Church means the Catholic Church is currently an anti-Semitic organization and its current members are, therefore, also anti-Semitic.

Pius V was not an Anti-Semite

Only an Anti-Semite would make that claim ...

Three months into his reign, Pope Pius V rejects Pope Pius IV leniency towards Jews and reinstates the restrictions of Pope Paul IV which forced Jews to wear a special cap, forbade them from owning real estate or practicing medicine on Christians. It also limited Jewish communities to only one synagogue.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jso ... eline.html

[Bernie Sanders]

Pius XII was also known as Hitler's Pope

The book "Hitler's Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII" was a fascinating look at the politics in the Vatican.

[Bernie Sanders]

and the Democrats killed Hitler.

Democrats didn't kill Hitler. He killed himself when the Russians started breathing down his neck.

Russians were helped by the U.S. with lots of aid during the war. If we didn't helped the Russians, it would of been Patton and his tanks that would of rolled into Berlin. Yes, and Hitler would of killed himself anyways.

The U.S. was helped by Russia. A small shipment of busted American rifles and used underwear isn't the equivalent of 20 million dead, and the wild-eyed, flag-waving frenzy you've worked yourself up into doesn't make you the savior of the world, Bernie. Even the Japanese make fun of you for it -

... between 1941 and 1942 only 7% of the wartime cargo shipped from the US made it to the Soviet Union. The bulk of the weapons and other materials arrived in the Soviet Union in 1944-1945, once the winds of war had decisively shifted.

http://orientalreview.org/2015/05/12/ww ... -enough-i/

I'm sure you get a lot of your information from cartoons.

Without Americans supplies, USSR would of not been able to feed it's starving masses, even though starving was still common, it would of been much worse. Yep, SPAM saved the day!

Russia also received thousands of trucks from the US, which made mass troop movements and supplies possible.

We gave Russia the edge and without that edge, the war would have lasted longer, but it would have made Eastern Europe free of Soviet tyranny. BUT, helping the Soviets also prevented many American losses. Of course, we could of dropped atomic bombs in the fall of 1945 to speed the end of the war.

[tzor]

By your same logic, past incidences of anti-Semitism within the Catholic Church means the Catholic Church is currently an anti-Semitic organization and its current members are, therefore, also anti-Semitic.

No, it's not by the same logic, because you cite past incidences of antisemitism (it's one word by the way) in Europe and insist that it applies to the Church. These incidences are not a part of the hierarchy of the church. I mean it's not like we have the equivalent in the church of members of the KKK being in high positions of congress and the party. More over, the church has expressed outright rejection of all antisemitism (while maintaining sympathy with the plight of Palestinians which is sometimes misconstrued as such).

Show me a current bishop's remarks and I'll quote to you the statements of Vice President Joe Biden about Barrack Hussein Obama, as well as a couple of off the record remarks from William Jefferson Clinton. I'll show you examples where Democrats talk "black" when standing in front of African-American audiences and especially when behind the pulpit of an African-American Christian Church.

Hell has no fury than Democrats against an African American who doesn't tow the master's line and actually has a conservative thought.

[Symmetry]

By your same logic, past incidences of anti-Semitism within the Catholic Church means the Catholic Church is currently an anti-Semitic organization and its current members are, therefore, also anti-Semitic.

No, it's not by the same logic, because you cite past incidences of antisemitism (it's one word by the way) in Europe and insist that it applies to the Church. These incidences are not a part of the hierarchy of the church. I mean it's not like we have the equivalent in the church of members of the KKK being in high positions of congress and the party. More over, the church has expressed outright rejection of all antisemitism (while maintaining sympathy with the plight of Palestinians which is sometimes misconstrued as such).

Show me a current bishop's remarks and I'll quote to you the statements of Vice President Joe Biden about Barrack Hussein Obama, as well as a couple of off the record remarks from William Jefferson Clinton. I'll show you examples where Democrats talk "black" when standing in front of African-American audiences and especially when behind the pulpit of an African-American Christian Church.

Hell has no fury than Democrats against an African American who doesn't tow the master's line and actually has a conservative thought.

What do you mean by "talk black"? You imply it's an evil equivalent to antisemitism, but I'm a bit unclear as to your meaning.

[luns101]

An interesting situation- thoughts?

I happen to know a lot of white people in America, and wouldn't really have a problem if one of them became president.

[Symmetry]

An interesting situation- thoughts?

I happen to know a lot of white people in America, and wouldn't really have a problem if one of them became president.

Which one?

[luns101]

An interesting situation- thoughts?

I happen to know a lot of white people in America, and wouldn't really have a problem if one of them became president.

Which one?

Frank

[tzor]

What do you mean by "talk black"? You imply it's an evil equivalent to antisemitism, but I'm a bit unclear as to your meaning.

Biden's



"He's going to put y'all back in chains."

Here is Hillary's



"I don't feel no ways tired."

[patches70]

Endless fun is made of Hilary and that incident. It's like a slow motion train wreck where the only casualty is Hilary's dignity. Haha.

[saxitoxin]

By your same logic, past incidences of anti-Semitism within the Catholic Church means the Catholic Church is currently an anti-Semitic organization and its current members are, therefore, also anti-Semitic.

No, it's not by the same logic, because you cite past incidences of antisemitism (it's one word by the way) in Europe and insist that it applies to the Church. These incidences are not a part of the hierarchy of the church. I mean it's not like we have the equivalent in the church of members of the KKK being in high positions of congress and the party. More over, the church has expressed outright rejection of all antisemitism (while maintaining sympathy with the plight of Palestinians which is sometimes misconstrued as such).

Show me a current bishop's remarks and I'll quote to you the statements of Vice President Joe Biden about Barrack Hussein Obama, as well as a couple of off the record remarks from William Jefferson Clinton. I'll show you examples where Democrats talk "black" when standing in front of African-American audiences and especially when behind the pulpit of an African-American Christian Church.

Hell has no fury than Democrats against an African American who doesn't tow the master's line and actually has a conservative thought.

The Democrats don't have "members of the KKK being in high positions of Congress." They did. Recently. Just like the Catholic Church doesn't have anti Semites or pedophiles in power but did. Recently.

Therefore again, by your logic (the past always equals the present), you have voluntarily joined an anti Semitic pedophilia cult. In fact, it's almost certain some of the money you've personally given in the past to the Church, based on what we know from instances like the Billy Doe case, has been used to purchase objects that were later employed in the forced sodomizing of young boys.

[notyou2]

I have asked him that several times. He has yet to respond. I have come to the conclusion Tzor liked the candy bars and attention. No doubt he is carrying on the tradition.

Attaboy tzor

[saxitoxin]

Show me a current bishop's remarks

"Our society [Society of St Pius X] is being tested by the devil. Who was the most opposed that the Church would recognize the Society? The enemies of the Church: the Jews, the Masons."
- Bishop Bernard Fellay, 2012

[/quote]

Yikes!

[saxitoxin]

Robert Byrd, Klan member, was a solid Democrat until he died in 2010.

Strom Thurmond, a segregationist who said there weren't "enough troops in the Army to force the Southern people to break down segregation and admit nig**rs into our theatres", left the Democratic Party and joined the Republican Party in 1964 after he decided it had evolved to better reflect his views than the Democrats. Within the GOP he was celebrated with every possible accolade, including being placed fourth in line to the presidency as President Pro Tempore until 2003 and receiving the Medal of Freedom from GHW Bush. The Republican-controlled South Carolina legislature even erected a statue to him less than 10 years ago -

[tzor]

The Democrats don't have "members of the KKK being in high positions of Congress." They did. Recently.

Recently as in say ... six years ago?

Robert Carlyle Byrd was a United States Senator from West Virginia. A member of the Democratic Party, Byrd served as a U.S. Representative from 1953 until 1959 and as a U.S. Senator from 1959 to 2010.

That's right Barrack Hussein Obama was POTUS while KKK member Byrd was in Congress. And why not not? Because it was discouraged by Byrd himself, In 1997, Byrd told an interviewer he would encourage young people to become involved in politics but also warned, "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan. Don't get that albatross around your neck. Once you've made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena."

[Bernie Sanders]

The Democrats don't have "members of the KKK being in high positions of Congress." They did. Recently.

Recently as in say ... six years ago?

Robert Carlyle Byrd was a United States Senator from West Virginia. A member of the Democratic Party, Byrd served as a U.S. Representative from 1953 until 1959 and as a U.S. Senator from 1959 to 2010.

That's right Barrack Hussein Obama was POTUS while KKK member Byrd was in Congress. And why not not? Because it was discouraged by Byrd himself, In 1997, Byrd told an interviewer he would encourage young people to become involved in politics but also warned, "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan. Don't get that albatross around your neck. Once you've made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena."

Stop it Tzor, you are being silly with that partisan talk.

All over the United States, Republican Governors and legislatures are doing everything in their power to make it MORE DIFFICULT TO VOTE. This is all to discourage NEGROES and other minorities, elderly and those in schools to vote.

America has thee lowest voting participation among democracies in the world. We should make voting easier not harder!