Astronauts Gone Wild

[xtratabasco]

you just said there is no air on the moon.

that is why the flag should not be waving, moving maybe, but not flapping back and forth.

you proved your own self wrong.... LOL

[Backglass]

you just said there is no air on the moon.

that is why the flag should not be waving, moving maybe, but not flapping back and forth.

you proved your own self wrong.... LOL

Please re-read. You don't need air to "flap back and forth".

Any time you are ready to answer my questions, go right ahead.

[xtratabasco]

you just said there is no air on the moon.

that is why the flag should not be waving, moving maybe, but not flapping back and forth.

you proved your own self wrong.... LOL

Please re-read. You don't need air to "flap back and forth".

Any time you are ready to answer my questions, go right ahead.

you need air and more importantly, you need gravity.


LOL

[xtratabasco]

Now, lets get back to your camera excuse you used.


When I was in middle school, way back in the 70s I did a science project using a cardboard toilet paper roll type tube, masking tape, and the crappiest film around (we were reacting oldstyle picture taking)

The stars came out beautiful.



So, your saying that the cameras and film and brightness, (or lack there of) of the stars prevented them from being scene, when the Earth and ohter shots were clearly visable? LOL


come on man, nobodys buying that bunk..... LOL

[millej11]

Now, lets get back to your camera excuse you used.


When I was in middle school, way back in the 70s I did a science project using a cardboard toilet paper roll type tube, masking tape, and the crappiest film around (we were reacting oldstyle picture taking)

The stars came out beautiful.

Quit trying to make your self sound older than you are kid. And taking a picture on earth with suficient light and shadows is a lot easier than taking one on the moon with blinding light from one side and black abyss on the other.

[unriggable]

Americans never landed on the moon. They don't even have the tech to build their own space station, only in recent years they launched the INTERNATIONAL space station and all nasa's mission to space these days are? yeap to repair it, if they are having soo much trouble with a space station how can they land on the moon? other evidence exists van allen band, no stars and strange shadows in photos its clear that america has faked moon landing !

None of that is true. NASA invented rockets in the late 50's that were powerful enough to break free of the Earth's atmosphere. The Soviets and the Americans launched several 'suicide pods', in which a camera was placed on a rocket and flown to the moon. They used this process to map the moon and to find out where it was safe to land and where it wasn't. There is plenty of proof showing that these actually landed on the moon - none of them were found on Earth, and nowhere on Earth are there that many craters. Using the construction principles of these missions, they created the apollo spacecrafts - the launching pads were essentially the same, meaning that aside from the added weight of the crew and materials, it should launch the same way. And it did. There are sightings of the astronauts going into the ship, and the ship taking off.

Now why would they throw away all that technology?

[xtratabasco]

Now, lets get back to your camera excuse you used.


When I was in middle school, way back in the 70s I did a science project using a cardboard toilet paper roll type tube, masking tape, and the crappiest film around (we were reacting oldstyle picture taking)

The stars came out beautiful.

Quit trying to make your self sound older than you are kid. And taking a picture on earth with suficient light and shadows is a lot easier than taking one on the moon with blinding light from one side and black abyss on the other.

NASA could have borrowed my toilet paper roll.


LMFAO

[The1exile]

you need air and more importantly, you need gravity.


LOL

No, you don't.

He already explained this. While you're taking photography, some simple physics would also help you out.

[xtratabasco]

you need air and more importantly, you need gravity.


LOL

No, you don't.

He already explained this.

No, he didn't.


LOL

[Backglass]

So, your saying that the cameras and film and brightness, (or lack there of) of the stars prevented them from being scene, when the Earth and ohter shots were clearly visable?

Repeat after me...the MOON is not like the EARTH. The Moon's surface is airless. On Earth, our thick atmosphere scatters sunlight, spreading it out over the whole sky. That's why the sky is bright during the day. Without sunlight, the air is dark at night, allowing us to see stars.

On the Moon, the lack of air means that the sky is dark. Even when the Sun is high off the horizon in the middle of the day, the sky near it will be black. If you were standing on the Moon, you would see stars, even during the day.

So why aren't they in the Apollo pictures? Pretend for a moment you are an astronaut on the surface of the Moon. You want to take a picture of your fellow space traveler. The Sun is low off the horizon, since all the lunar landings were done at local morning. How do you set your camera? The lunar landscape is brightly lit by the Sun, of course, and your friend is wearing a white spacesuit also brilliantly lit by the Sun. To take a picture of a bright object with a bright background, you need to set the exposure time to be fast, and close down the aperture setting too; that's like the pupil in your eye constricting to let less light in when you walk outside on a sunny day.

So the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time.

If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture of a nearby street light with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars. Please give it a try and see for yourself.

come on man, nobodys buying that bunk..... LOL

I have given you answers for everyone of your allegations. Would you care to answer my questions now?

Take your time...and you can leave your tin foil hat on if you like.

[xtratabasco]

So, your saying that the cameras and film and brightness, (or lack there of) of the stars prevented them from being scene, when the Earth and ohter shots were clearly visable?

Repeat after me...the MOON is not like the EARTH. The Moon's surface is airless. On Earth, our thick atmosphere scatters sunlight, spreading it out over the whole sky. That's why the sky is bright during the day. Without sunlight, the air is dark at night, allowing us to see stars.

On the Moon, the lack of air means that the sky is dark. Even when the Sun is high off the horizon in the middle of the day, the sky near it will be black. If you were standing on the Moon, you would see stars, even during the day.

So why aren't they in the Apollo pictures? Pretend for a moment you are an astronaut on the surface of the Moon. You want to take a picture of your fellow space traveler. The Sun is low off the horizon, since all the lunar landings were done at local morning. How do you set your camera? The lunar landscape is brightly lit by the Sun, of course, and your friend is wearing a white spacesuit also brilliantly lit by the Sun. To take a picture of a bright object with a bright background, you need to set the exposure time to be fast, and close down the aperture setting too; that's like the pupil in your eye constricting to let less light in when you walk outside on a sunny day.

So the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time.

If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture of a nearby street light with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars. Please give it a try and see for yourself.

come on man, nobodys buying that bunk..... LOL

I have given you answers for everyone of your allegations. Would you care to answer my questions now?

Take your time...and you can leave your tin foil hat on if you like.

not until you prove your points, which you havent done. you have given me your theorys. LOL

[millej11]

How 'bout we all just ingnore this punk middle schooler and get on with our happy lives. Were just giving him the attention he craves.

[Backglass]

not until you prove your points, which you havent done. you have given me your theorys. LOL

Please also take a debate class.

I have responded...you may now refute my points specifically.

Otherwise you are just being a troll.

[xtratabasco]

yah, go about your lives, and dont back up your points.


LOL

[xtratabasco]

not until you prove your points, which you havent done. you have given me your theorys. LOL

Please also take a debate class.

I have responded...you may now refute my points specifically.

Otherwise you are just being a troll.

ic, im a troll because you didnt back up your theories. LOL

[unriggable]

not until you prove your points, which you havent done. you have given me your theorys. LOL

Please also take a debate class.

I have responded...you may now refute my points specifically.

Otherwise you are just being a troll.

ic, im a troll because you didnt back up your theories. LOL

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperture

[xtratabasco]

So, your saying that the cameras and film and brightness, (or lack there of) of the stars prevented them from being scene, when the Earth and ohter shots were clearly visable?

Repeat after me...the MOON is not like the EARTH. The Moon's surface is airless. On Earth, our thick atmosphere scatters sunlight, spreading it out over the whole sky. That's why the sky is bright during the day. Without sunlight, the air is dark at night, allowing us to see stars.

On the Moon, the lack of air means that the sky is dark. Even when the Sun is high off the horizon in the middle of the day, the sky near it will be black. If you were standing on the Moon, you would see stars, even during the day.

So why aren't they in the Apollo pictures? Pretend for a moment you are an astronaut on the surface of the Moon. You want to take a picture of your fellow space traveler. The Sun is low off the horizon, since all the lunar landings were done at local morning. How do you set your camera? The lunar landscape is brightly lit by the Sun, of course, and your friend is wearing a white spacesuit also brilliantly lit by the Sun. To take a picture of a bright object with a bright background, you need to set the exposure time to be fast, and close down the aperture setting too; that's like the pupil in your eye constricting to let less light in when you walk outside on a sunny day.

So the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time.

If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture of a nearby street light with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars. Please give it a try and see for yourself.

come on man, nobodys buying that bunk..... LOL

I have given you answers for everyone of your allegations. Would you care to answer my questions now?

Take your time...and you can leave your tin foil hat on if you like.

The only reason you cant see any stars is because of the atmosphere. you cant see any planets or the moon either, but on the moon you can clearly see Earth, and even NO CLOUDS, imagine that. LOL


LMFAO


retry plezzzz....lol

[unriggable]

So, your saying that the cameras and film and brightness, (or lack there of) of the stars prevented them from being scene, when the Earth and ohter shots were clearly visable?

Repeat after me...the MOON is not like the EARTH. The Moon's surface is airless. On Earth, our thick atmosphere scatters sunlight, spreading it out over the whole sky. That's why the sky is bright during the day. Without sunlight, the air is dark at night, allowing us to see stars.

On the Moon, the lack of air means that the sky is dark. Even when the Sun is high off the horizon in the middle of the day, the sky near it will be black. If you were standing on the Moon, you would see stars, even during the day.

So why aren't they in the Apollo pictures? Pretend for a moment you are an astronaut on the surface of the Moon. You want to take a picture of your fellow space traveler. The Sun is low off the horizon, since all the lunar landings were done at local morning. How do you set your camera? The lunar landscape is brightly lit by the Sun, of course, and your friend is wearing a white spacesuit also brilliantly lit by the Sun. To take a picture of a bright object with a bright background, you need to set the exposure time to be fast, and close down the aperture setting too; that's like the pupil in your eye constricting to let less light in when you walk outside on a sunny day.

So the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time.

If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture of a nearby street light with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars. Please give it a try and see for yourself.

come on man, nobodys buying that bunk..... LOL

I have given you answers for everyone of your allegations. Would you care to answer my questions now?

Take your time...and you can leave your tin foil hat on if you like.

The only reason you cant see any stars is because of the atmosphere. you cant see any planets or the moon either, but on the moon you can clearly see Earth, and even NO CLOUDS, imagine that. LOL


LMFAO


retry plezzzz....lol

Where the hell is your evidence.

[xtratabasco]

So, your saying that the cameras and film and brightness, (or lack there of) of the stars prevented them from being scene, when the Earth and ohter shots were clearly visable?

Repeat after me...the MOON is not like the EARTH. The Moon's surface is airless. On Earth, our thick atmosphere scatters sunlight, spreading it out over the whole sky. That's why the sky is bright during the day. Without sunlight, the air is dark at night, allowing us to see stars.

On the Moon, the lack of air means that the sky is dark. Even when the Sun is high off the horizon in the middle of the day, the sky near it will be black. If you were standing on the Moon, you would see stars, even during the day.

So why aren't they in the Apollo pictures? Pretend for a moment you are an astronaut on the surface of the Moon. You want to take a picture of your fellow space traveler. The Sun is low off the horizon, since all the lunar landings were done at local morning. How do you set your camera? The lunar landscape is brightly lit by the Sun, of course, and your friend is wearing a white spacesuit also brilliantly lit by the Sun. To take a picture of a bright object with a bright background, you need to set the exposure time to be fast, and close down the aperture setting too; that's like the pupil in your eye constricting to let less light in when you walk outside on a sunny day.

So the picture you take is set for bright objects. Stars are faint objects! In the fast exposure, they simply do not have time to register on the film. It has nothing to do with the sky being black or the lack of air, it's just a matter of exposure time.

If you were to go outside here on Earth on the darkest night imaginable and take a picture of a nearby street light with the exact same camera settings the astronauts used, you won't see any stars. Please give it a try and see for yourself.

come on man, nobodys buying that bunk..... LOL

I have given you answers for everyone of your allegations. Would you care to answer my questions now?

Take your time...and you can leave your tin foil hat on if you like.

The only reason you cant see any stars is because of the atmosphere. you cant see any planets or the moon either, but on the moon you can clearly see Earth, and even NO CLOUDS, imagine that. LOL


LMFAO


retry plezzzz....lol

Where the hell is your evidence.

mines a conspiricy theory, remember. LOL

your the ones that said it happened...LOL

[xtratabasco]

hey i gotta go, mommys calling me in for my nap. sorry for kicking your ars.


LOL


see u when i get back from work, emmm preschool. LOL

[Backglass]

The only reason you cant see any stars is because of the atmosphere. you cant see any planets or the moon either, but on the moon you can clearly see Earth, and even NO CLOUDS, imagine that. LOL

LMFAO

retry plezzzz....lol

I take it back. It is obvious now you are NOT enrolled in school as you cant even read.

[unriggable]

I can theorize that the world is shaped like a cone, and until you find evidence for your theory it is just as valid as mine.

[millej11]

Where the hell is your evidence.

I think it was somewhere between LOOL RLY!! and LOLZ HAHA

[xtratabasco]

I can theorize that the world is shaped like a cone, and until you find evidence for your theory it is just as valid as mine.

go back and re-read, I already proved that it didnt happen.

LOL

[Backglass]

Where the hell is your evidence.

I think it was somewhere between LOOL RLY!! and LOLZ HAHA

Exactly, because thats how 40 year old people talk (middle school in the 70's my ass!).