Jamie wrote:As many of you know, a while back, I posted a thread condeming the practice of homosexuality, and I got blasted for it. I'm not tolerant you said. I'm racist you said (homosexualty isn't a race by the way). I was called every filthy thing there is to be called, for speaking ill of homosexuals. So, after all of that grief I took for everything I wrote in that thread, I wrote a thread that implied Muhammad might have been gay. Now some of the same people that bashed me for calling homosexaulity wrong, bashed me for saying Muhammad was gay. If there is nothing wrong with being gay, and it is ok, and accepted to be gay, then what exactly is wrong with a revered religious leader being merely implied as gay, without actually being so. Alot of people are speaking out both sides of their face. Either it is ok to be gay, or it isn't. The person that is, or isn't gay, should make no difference as to whether it is alright to be gay, or not.
God, you whinge like a girl. Grow a pair and shut the f*ck up.
Fag.