Napoleon Ier wrote:Dancing Mustard wrote:So Jenos wins then?
Are you retarded?
No, he is not. But you're not proving otherwise.
I never said Quebec imbecile. I said, etc. I was referring to the parts of Europe you listed: Parts of Belgium, maybe, I'll give you that. But Switzerland? No. As for Quebec, the people in Quebec, both the city and the whole province in general, has a distinctly French influence, that is undeniable. In fact, if it weren't for some of your colonists, I wouldn't be able to enjoy Cajun food as it is.
Returning to unplesant matters: I only was dispelling your moronic notion that the Celts who used to live in France are the virtual sole origins of France, you seemed to make a point of minimizing or even flat out not mentioning the Burgundians (no mention at all) or the Franks (same), let along the prior wave of Visigoths (ditto). Or the Romans (more than the others, but that isn't saying much) before that, for that matter. The Romanized colonies and settlements did exist, that cannot be denied (no matter how you want to twist my words); but that was prior to a period of ethnic migration at the waning days of Rome.
So, when the Visigoths had shown up, the Gauls had long been gone, supplanted by a Roman culture. The Germano-Gallic culture never existed, but a Germano-
Roman one did, supplanting an earlier Romanized Gallic one, and that is were the comment about "mutation" of the Franks (and other germanic tribes which had settled there prior) had come from.
That is all I was trying to get across.
Is it my fault you managed to make an ass of yourself? Sorry, another of those annoying rhetorical questions. If it weren't, the answer would still be a resounding no. I cannot be blamed for your thickheadedness.