luns101 wrote:The verdict was just recently put out. Give it some time and you may see his license revoked. These things take time. Are we to expect an "instant" verdict according to popular will? No, we must have a system where everyone is heard out (even ridiculous people) and the facts are weighed. Time lets people take a deep breath and make reasonable decisions. I doubt that girl will get any $$ out of the suit, but the teacher will be reprimanded in some fashion. You're taking two extreme cases and making a judgment about our legal system based on them.
I don't consider those two cases too extreme. They seem to be pretty good examples of what happens in the American legal system
Doctors and teachers are running scared because of lawers (all students have to get permission slips to even see M rated movies, because the teachers are afraid of being sued for showing them.
luns101 wrote:
Well, I don't think that you can make arguments against the US healthcare system based on your country's. I am sorry to hear about your experience with a broken arm, and I hope that you have healed...seriously.
Well, to the best of my knowledge they are quite similar, so I think any example that has to do with one is applicable to the other.
Any my experience with my broken arm was actually quite a good one. Because it was a private hospital, it had Pay-tv; something very important to a 12 year old
luns101 wrote:
Because your points coincide mostly with what liberal politicians here espouse. I hear the talking points but I rarely see facts posted - just rhetoric and hypotheticals. I think others here have been the one to "polarize" this subject as all I said was I'm happy to be living in what I consider to be the greatest country on earth. It doesn't mean I think Americans are better than others.
Hey, I would like to say that for someone who is criticizing rhetoric you sure did use a lot of it in your response to my arguments
Anyway; why do you consider the US to be the greatest? What particular quality puts it apart from all the other developed nations of the world?
luns101 wrote:Once again filled with hypotheticals...not reality. You also claimed his dictatorial powers were "proof" of this. Proof is based in reality, not a hypothetical.
How much more proof do you want? Your liberties are slowly being stripped away and government surveilence is on the rise. I think that counts as enough evidence to make a pretty broad prediction like mine.
luns101 wrote:
Of course I can't show you where you said it because you never said it...and guess what?...I never claimed that you said it so stop shifting the discussion. I refuted your insinuation that the United States manipulates 3rd world countries for the purpose of putting them into debt and hoarding tons of $$ so nobody else in the world can have it. We help the 3rd world in many areas because (1) it is morally good to do so, and (2) it makes good business sense to help developing countries prosper.
It may have come out that way, but I wasn't implying anything about the USA or it's plans for developing countries.
What I was aiming for was simply to show how flawed and easily abused Capitalism is.
luns101 wrote:
To show you and others that may read this thread that space exploration was not simply for the purpose of showing up the Russians as a "political gesture" as you put it. It has aided mankind in a variety of ways here on earth and will continue to do so.
But the Apollo landings were done purely to show the Russians up. There were several proposals on the table at the same time, but Kennedy decided that landing on the Moon would give the biggest bang for the smallest cost.
Those other technologies might have been developed because of the Moon landings, but they were never it's original purpose.
luns101 wrote:No, not in those exact words, but you did criticize the USA's space program when you said:
Neutrino wrote:Your Space Program is also a joke and your only means of delivering significant masses into orbit (the Space Shuttle) is the result of a bad compromise; it neither fufills it's role as a cheap, re-usable transport, or as a War Plane. While the Moon landings did provide a boost too several industries, they were ultimatly a political gesture and nothing more. As soon as it was discovered that there was nothing immediatly useful on the Moon, the entire thing was abandoned.
I was simply criticizing the current Space Program, which you seemed desperate to defend. It
is a bugely expensive, hugely inefficient cash-cow. It's only method of moving masses into orbit is ageing and needs to be extensively repaired after each flight (it would actually be cheaper to build a whole new Shuttle after every flight)
luns101 wrote:
How do you know this? How "easy" is it land a manned spacecraft on another planet? I'm not an expert and I'm assuming you aren't either. I would guess it's actually quite difficult and takes a lot of planning.
Not that hard; I mean we went to the Moon 40 years ago. We should easily be capable of going to Mars now. Even von Braun was planning ways to go to Mars 40 years ago.
And most of the planning is already done. NASA employs hundreds if not thousands of scientists and there is often not enough work for them all to do. So the ones who have lots of spare time plot imaginery missions.
Hell, Newtonian physics isn't very hard; it's extremly predictable. Give me a couple of hours and some technical details and I could probably plot you a mission to Mars.
luns101 wrote:Yes, but Bruce Willis and Ben Affleck need those in order to save the world from future asteroids hurling towards earth (my poor attempt at humor

) We do have plans to return to the moon and study it in depth. Repairing and maintaining the ISS is part of our long-term plan. We do plan to go to Mars. We're not doing these things to thumb our nose at the rest of the world. You can read about it for yourself here:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/explo ... index.html
The problem with going to the Moon is that there is effectivley nothing there (unless you want fuel for fusion engines, really high quality glass or lots of sunlight.)
Other than that, what is the Moon useful for? Nothing. (Oh, maybe Aluminium - Oxygen engines, but you can get better than that down here on earth)
The ISS is also a waste of time; way to big and way to expensive.
If you wan't to do something useful in space, go mine some NEA's. That'll achieve something.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!