DoomYoshi wrote:Click here for a scandal that will surely shatter your world:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... ir-helgemo
Mind Blown...

Moderator: Community Team
DoomYoshi wrote:Click here for a scandal that will surely shatter your world:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... ir-helgemo
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
DoomYoshi wrote:Click here for a scandal that will surely shatter your world:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... ir-helgemo
DoomYoshi wrote:Click here for a scandal that will surely shatter your world:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/ ... ir-helgemo
DoomYoshi wrote:Everything you know is wrong... just forget the words and sing along:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/podc ... mona-lisa/
Sometimes He upbraids, and sometimes He threatens. Some men He mourns over, others He addresses with the voice of song, just as a good physician treats some of his patients with cataplasms, some with rubbing, some with fomentations; in one case cuts open with the lancet, in another cauterizes, in another amputates, in order if possible to cure the patient's diseased part or member. The Saviour has many tones of voice, and many methods for the salvation of men; by threatening He admonishes, by upbraiding He converts, by bewailing He pities, by the voice of song He cheers.
Socrates claimed to have heard voices in his head from youth, and is described as standing still in public places for long stretches of time, deep in thought. Plato notes these phenomena without comment, accepting Socrates’ own description of the voices as his ‘divine sign’, and reporting on his awe-inspiring ability to meditate for hours on end. Aristotle, the son of a doctor, took a more medical approach: he suggested that Socrates (along with other thinkers) suffered from a medical condition he calls ‘melancholy’. Recent medical investigators have agreed, speculating that Socrates’ behaviour was consistent with a medical condition known as catalepsy.
DoomYoshi wrote:So many know that common literacy came out of the Christian push to teach people to read their bibles. While many may think the benefit is in the past, there are still benefits, as bibles being translated into local dialects is helping to rescue endangered languages, like this one:
https://www.monitor.co.ug/News/National ... index.html
Symmetry wrote:There's a lot of evidence to show that the Renaissance pushed for a return to more classical forms Latin, for example, and basically killed it as a language.
Symmetry wrote: Further, bibles had to be authorised even in missionary work, and when print came into it, it becomes even more complicated.
Symmetry wrote:There's a lot of historians who are taking a more balanced view of the Reformation nowadays (though there's still plenty of people who think that Catholic society at the time was the black to Protestantism's white).
Symmetry wrote:On a broader front, it's often interesting to note that the missionary work by Christians in South America was probably one of the most destructive acts of genocide in early modern history, Entire literate cultures lost to people who thought that literacy meant that you could read their particular version of the Bible.
DoomYoshi wrote:I was wondering why he was taking female fertility drugs...
Either way, on to the next niche market:
https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/faking-hitler
DoomYoshi wrote:Wow, there is a lot to unpack here.Symmetry wrote:There's a lot of evidence to show that the Renaissance pushed for a return to more classical forms Latin, for example, and basically killed it as a language.
Latin was dead a thousand years before the Reformation (or the Renaissance, but that's not what I think you meant to say). There were still various vulgar latins spoken which morphed into the Romance languages. This was already happening a long time ago. Jerome's Vulgate is so-named because he didn't write in literary latin, but rather the vulgar latin of the time. Once the Western Roman Empire collapsed, the Eastern empire continued to use Greek and there was no central authority to rule on the correct grammar of latin anymore, so people just spoke French, Italian, Spanish, Romanian, etc.Symmetry wrote: Further, bibles had to be authorised even in missionary work, and when print came into it, it becomes even more complicated.
I am not sure what you mean by this.Symmetry wrote:There's a lot of historians who are taking a more balanced view of the Reformation nowadays (though there's still plenty of people who think that Catholic society at the time was the black to Protestantism's white).
I specifically did not mention Protestantism above.Symmetry wrote:On a broader front, it's often interesting to note that the missionary work by Christians in South America was probably one of the most destructive acts of genocide in early modern history, Entire literate cultures lost to people who thought that literacy meant that you could read their particular version of the Bible.
Yes, although oddly enough the Vatican library is the best source for most of that literature now.
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap