muy_thaiguy wrote:Neutrino wrote:Actually, much like the Soviet Union, it is Capitalism-on-steroids/dictatorship.
You get a super-wealthy, super-elite upper class and a super-poor working class. This is what Capitalism with eventually do, but, as you can see, both China and the USSR's Dictatorship/Communism beat you too it.

Changing my top 5 a bit,
1. Communism
2. Holocaust
3. the French
4. complete idiots
5. people that think that Communism is possible and is better then Capitalism
Did you actually read what I wrote, or are you just working on the assumption that it is about Communism and I am disagreeing with you so therefore I must both support Communism and think that it is an achievable, stable government in it's current form?
If you
had read and/or understood the post, then you would notice that I am, in fact, calling Communism Capitalism-on-steroids, and, therfore, bad. Please, explain for my feeble non-Capitalist mind exactly how that entails me supporting and/or considering feasable a plain Communist system of government?
As it is, I do, in fact, lean slightly towards to Communist side of the spectrum, but, in my opinion anyway, I have always been reasonably vocal in my opposition to a pure, (though
actually not very pure) China/USSR version of Communism. That system of government, although called Communism was, in reality, just a (super) Capitalist Dictatorship. It may have called itself whatever it wanted, but there is no denying what it actually was.
If you want to have another Capitalism v Other (superior) Options thread, then fine, (I don't really have anything better to do, anyway) but, please, if you are going to misquote, at least do it in a mildly subtle way (such as not quoting the text it was misquoted from for easy correction

)
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!