Moderator: Community Team
tzor wrote:South Korea's beef protests: Lee's woes deepen - Christian Science Monitor
You know Mad Cow is no longer in US beef, this whole protest is bull.
I say we should pull out all our troops from South Korea. Let all those malnurished and short North Koreans on the border of the DMZ invade their little country, rape all their cattle and eat all their women.
Meanwhile I'm going to enjoy a nice steak, or even a sirloin, from the good old U.S.A.
tzor wrote:South Korea's beef protests: Lee's woes deepen - Christian Science Monitor
You know Mad Cow is no longer in US beef, this whole protest is bull.
I say we should pull out all our troops from South Korea. Let all those malnurished and short North Koreans on the border of the DMZ invade their little country, rape all their cattle and eat all their women.
Meanwhile I'm going to enjoy a nice steak, or even a sirloin, from the good old U.S.A.
Exaggerating a bit, don't you think?heavycola wrote:tzor wrote:South Korea's beef protests: Lee's woes deepen - Christian Science Monitor
You know Mad Cow is no longer in US beef, this whole protest is bull.
I say we should pull out all our troops from South Korea. Let all those malnurished and short North Koreans on the border of the DMZ invade their little country, rape all their cattle and eat all their women.
Meanwhile I'm going to enjoy a nice steak, or even a sirloin, from the good old U.S.A.
Mmmm, every good patriot loves a steak from a taste-free, hormone-drenched supercow.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Exaggerating a bit, don't you think?heavycola wrote:tzor wrote:South Korea's beef protests: Lee's woes deepen - Christian Science Monitor
You know Mad Cow is no longer in US beef, this whole protest is bull.
I say we should pull out all our troops from South Korea. Let all those malnurished and short North Koreans on the border of the DMZ invade their little country, rape all their cattle and eat all their women.
Meanwhile I'm going to enjoy a nice steak, or even a sirloin, from the good old U.S.A.
Mmmm, every good patriot loves a steak from a taste-free, hormone-drenched supercow.
got tonkaed wrote:tzor are you suggesting that anytime a country chooses to take a stance against a commodity they feel is harmful and try to keep it out of their markets, that we should just cut ties with them?
7 February 2005, Rome --The few cases of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) or 'mad cow disease' in cattle in Canada and the US should not cause panic among consumers and producers, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) said in a statement today. Nor should the single case of BSE recently confirmed in a goat in France.
"The three cases in Canada and the one case in the US from an imported animal are isolated incidents," said Andrew Speedy, an FAO animal production expert. These cases were detected because of the testing procedures that are now in place. More than 176 000 tests out of a total cattle population of almost 95 million have been carried out in the USA and more than 21 000 out of 14.5 million cattle in Canada during 2004. A ban on feeding ruminant protein to ruminants has been in place in both countries since 1997.
havycola wrote:Mmmm, every good patriot loves a steak from a taste-free, hormone-drenched supercow.
Juan_Bottom wrote:They don't want any form of geniticaly modified foods. Many have been linked to cancer... I can't blame 'um.
tzor wrote:I think it is more of a statement that when you have made a very long term commitment to a nation that is in effect at war with another nation, by supplying troops on their border for them, and they in turn decide to protest as a collective body the very nature of free trade and international court decisions then one is either left for tit for tat trade retaliations or one just accepts that fact and says "if you don't want our beef, you probably don't want our troops either."
got tonkaed wrote:I guess my only real objection to this is that if we essentially decide we are going to take knee jerk reactions against regional allies everytime they decide to disagree with us on economic issues (considering how we fare in terms of WTO sanctions and the like) we are going to find we are in very short supply of support. I think for the US to do much of anything in retaliation would just be a silly overreaction.
btownmeggy wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:They don't want any form of geniticaly modified foods. Many have been linked to cancer... I can't blame 'um.
What GMOs have been linked to cancer??
Juan_Bottom wrote:btownmeggy wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:They don't want any form of geniticaly modified foods. Many have been linked to cancer... I can't blame 'um.
What GMOs have been linked to cancer??
Near as I can tell, most all of them. The most directly harmful to people is probably milk, and meat. Though GM plants are also very dangerous. Did you know that there is no more wild maize in all the world? What was left has cross-bred with RoundUp ready corn. But A quick search on your browser will bring up a bunch of stuff I am sure. Now, I'm not saying that they all cause cancer, only that gm foods have been linked to it.
"rBGH poses an even greater risk to human health than ever considered," warned Samuel Epstein M.D., Professor of Environmental Medicine .... "The FDA and Monsanto have a lot to answer for. Given the cancer risks, and other health concerns, why is rBGH milk still on the market?"
Juan_Bottom wrote:Mad Cow disease is only part of it. They don't want any form of geniticaly modified foods. Many have been linked to cancer... I can't blame 'um.
PLAYER57832 wrote:They are convinced that We don't eat our own beef .. and are exporting basically sick and poisoned stuff overseas.
radiojake wrote:go vegetarian - avoid making your stomach a rotting graveyard - will also avoid bowel cancer too!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users