Moderator: Community Team
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
HapSmo19 wrote:It appears there are archeologists back at Stonehenge digging around for the truth but you dont have to wait for them to decide whether or not they want to tell you what that is because I'm going to do it right now.
I've been interested in Stonehenge for years and have spent plenty of time researching it. I have never been there but from what I have gleaned from online research it is:
A trap. Yes, you heard it here first. From me. Sound crazy?
When you consider the other accepted theories:
1. An observatory (over-engineered to the nth degree)
2. A pagan temple of worship (there's always one of these)
3. A monument to the vagina (please....this guy even went to college)
Necessity being the mother of invention, a working trap for a very large, very dangerous animal is the most practical idea. I could go into great detail about how it worked but why?
Let the ridicule begin.......
Overhead http://www.sacred-destinations.com/engl ... 955ft.html
A web page http://witcombe.sbc.edu/earthmysteries/ ... henge.html
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
HapSmo19 wrote:The first link was just an overhead picture. The second is a general info site of existing info.
The trap thoery is mine. I was going to go into detail about how it works and will eventually but I am lazier.
muy_thaiguy wrote:So, in order to get an Irish Elk (I'm trying to figure out WHAT they could have hunted that MIGHT have required such large and heavy stones, and also the Irish Elk is about the only animal that I can place at the right time and place), they would, lure into the center of the ring, then stab at it when they could? I think it may be easier to just hurl a spear at it to bring it down then try and move all those ridiculously large stones just to get one or two animals.
HapSmo19 wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:So, in order to get an Irish Elk (I'm trying to figure out WHAT they could have hunted that MIGHT have required such large and heavy stones, and also the Irish Elk is about the only animal that I can place at the right time and place), they would, lure into the center of the ring, then stab at it when they could? I think it may be easier to just hurl a spear at it to bring it down then try and move all those ridiculously large stones just to get one or two animals.
A large cat? A mammoth? A dinosaur? Who knows for sure?
Though I believe it's far older than they say it is as the way it was dated is dubious.
Spears and arrows were secondary. The animal was lured in to the center with bait where a large stone (the "altar stone") was dropped on it while it was feeding.
The hunters(20 or so?), after coming out of the two barrows and circling in the ditch(bank on the inside for cover), snuck up behind the "lintels" and cut the rope, dropping the stone. Then safely filled it full of spears and arrows through the narrow slots between the stones. I think more to rid the area farmers and villages of a dangerous menace than for food.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:It's a trap for killing dragons! The bait was a virgin.
Balsiefen wrote:And your the guy saying the bloke who suggested it was a monument to the vagina was a nutjob?
Balsiefen wrote:A large cat? You won't get anything bigger than a Lynx in Britain at that time (see my avvy)
Balsiefen wrote:Mammoth-no chance. Far too early for the Celtic civilization to develop (or in fact, any non nomadic tribe, it died out long before metalworking and defiantly long before humans had enough technology for mounting and moving stones from wales
As for dinosaurs.![]()
Balsiefen wrote:The second thing is, its far too ceremonial for a simple trap (which could be made as you described by nothing but a few mounds of earth and a locally sourced stone.)
HapSmo19 wrote:Balsiefen wrote:And your the guy saying the bloke who suggested it was a monument to the vagina was a nutjob?
Why yes I am.
Balsiefen wrote:A large cat? You won't get anything bigger than a Lynx in Britain at that time (see my avvy)
1.How do you know?
2.Were you there?
3.And aproximately how long ago was it built according to you?Balsiefen wrote:Mammoth-no chance. Far too early for the Celtic civilization to develop (or in fact, any non nomadic tribe, it died out long before metalworking and defiantly long before humans had enough technology for mounting and moving stones from wales
As for dinosaurs.![]()
Questions 1 & 2 again.Balsiefen wrote:The second thing is, its far too ceremonial for a simple trap (which could be made as you described by nothing but a few mounds of earth and a locally sourced stone.)
You're probably right. Depending on how many people volunteer to die.
It's just MY theory. I only bring it up in a good humor sort of fashion and I would continue with responding to you but I haven't quit my day job and lunch break is over.
1.How do you know?
2.Were you there?
3.And aproximately how long ago was it built according to you?
muy_thaiguy wrote:1.How do you know?
2.Were you there?
3.And aproximately how long ago was it built according to you?
Large cats of the ice age era did not live in the British Isles, and I have yet to hear about any living in Europe (other then lions brought from Africa during the Roman times). Otherwise archeologists would have found large cats. And according to pretty much all studies, the Stonehenges of the Britsh Isles are estimated to be from about the late stone age to the bronze age.
And honestly, dinosaurs? No, just no.
Mammoths and Mastodons. I'm not 100% sure, but I somehow doubt that they lived on the British Isles. Oh they lived here in North America and in Asia, but I just can't really see such large creatures living on the British Isles.
Nickbaldwin wrote:Mammoths did I think.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Nickbaldwin wrote:Mammoths did I think.
No, definitely dragons, any other animal can be killed by throwing sharp sticks at it, but it's really safer to knock out a dragon before you poke it. And for that you need a large, heavy, hard object, like a big cock.
muy_thaiguy wrote:1.How do you know?
2.Were you there?
3.And aproximately how long ago was it built according to you?
Large cats of the ice age era did not live in the British Isles, and I have yet to hear about any living in Europe (other then lions brought from Africa during the Roman times). Otherwise archeologists would have found large cats. And according to pretty much all studies, the Stonehenges of the Britsh Isles are estimated to be from about the late stone age to the bronze age.
And honestly, dinosaurs? No, just no.
Mammoths and Mastodons. I'm not 100% sure, but I somehow doubt that they lived on the British Isles. Oh they lived here in North America and in Asia, but I just can't really see such large creatures living on the British Isles.
jonesthecurl wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:1.How do you know?
2.Were you there?
3.And aproximately how long ago was it built according to you?
Large cats of the ice age era did not live in the British Isles, and I have yet to hear about any living in Europe (other then lions brought from Africa during the Roman times). Otherwise archeologists would have found large cats. And according to pretty much all studies, the Stonehenges of the Britsh Isles are estimated to be from about the late stone age to the bronze age.
And honestly, dinosaurs? No, just no.
Mammoths and Mastodons. I'm not 100% sure, but I somehow doubt that they lived on the British Isles. Oh they lived here in North America and in Asia, but I just can't really see such large creatures living on the British Isles.
Aha, that was because they were all caught in the trap.
jonesthecurl wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:1.How do you know?
2.Were you there?
3.And aproximately how long ago was it built according to you?
Large cats of the ice age era did not live in the British Isles, and I have yet to hear about any living in Europe (other then lions brought from Africa during the Roman times). Otherwise archeologists would have found large cats. And according to pretty much all studies, the Stonehenges of the Britsh Isles are estimated to be from about the late stone age to the bronze age.
And honestly, dinosaurs? No, just no.
Mammoths and Mastodons. I'm not 100% sure, but I somehow doubt that they lived on the British Isles. Oh they lived here in North America and in Asia, but I just can't really see such large creatures living on the British Isles.
Aha, that was because they were all caught in the trap.
Balsiefen wrote:A trap, no; temple, maybe
Why take care so that the sun would move exactly through the central stone at midsummer and midwinter? Why line the outside banks with gleaming white stone so it can be seen from miles around?
Balsiefen wrote:The second thing is, its far too ceremonial for a simple trap (which could be made as you described by nothing but a few mounds of earth and a locally sourced stone.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users