Moderator: Community Team
jonesthecurl wrote:Why would you call young white males "Mohammed"?
DoomYoshi wrote:Recently there was a shooter in Toronto. I heard some people talking on the radio about something that I had only heard among academics before. It's the idea of not naming the perpetrator after an attack to stop giving notoriety to them and (hopefully) not inspiring copycats.
It seems like a decent idea with one small issue. They suggest saying "the perpetrator" or "the suspect" instead of the name. Those names don't actually convey what happened, so if all media accounts were to change to "the Mohammed" it would work better.
Dukasaur wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Recently there was a shooter in Toronto. I heard some people talking on the radio about something that I had only heard among academics before. It's the idea of not naming the perpetrator after an attack to stop giving notoriety to them and (hopefully) not inspiring copycats.
It seems like a decent idea with one small issue. They suggest saying "the perpetrator" or "the suspect" instead of the name. Those names don't actually convey what happened, so if all media accounts were to change to "the Mohammed" it would work better.
There have been two mass murders in Toronto this year. The first one, a non-Muslim, killed 10 people. The second one, a Muslim, killed two people. Extrapolating from this limited sample size, we can say with some certainty that non-Muslim terrorists kill five times as many people as Muslim terrorists. Mohammed is therefore poor choice for our abstract killer name. Andy might be good, or Federico, or perhaps Spock.
DoomYoshi wrote:Dukasaur wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Recently there was a shooter in Toronto. I heard some people talking on the radio about something that I had only heard among academics before. It's the idea of not naming the perpetrator after an attack to stop giving notoriety to them and (hopefully) not inspiring copycats.
It seems like a decent idea with one small issue. They suggest saying "the perpetrator" or "the suspect" instead of the name. Those names don't actually convey what happened, so if all media accounts were to change to "the Mohammed" it would work better.
There have been two mass murders in Toronto this year. The first one, a non-Muslim, killed 10 people. The second one, a Muslim, killed two people. Extrapolating from this limited sample size, we can say with some certainty that non-Muslim terrorists kill five times as many people as Muslim terrorists. Mohammed is therefore poor choice for our abstract killer name. Andy might be good, or Federico, or perhaps Spock.
They both acted like Mohammed though. He was always driving around in vans and shooting people.
DoomYoshi wrote:Recently there was a shooter in Toronto. I heard some people talking on the radio about something that I had only heard among academics before. It's the idea of not naming the perpetrator after an attack to stop giving notoriety to them and (hopefully) not inspiring copycats.
It seems like a decent idea with one small issue. They suggest saying "the perpetrator" or "the suspect" instead of the name. Those names don't actually convey what happened, so if all media accounts were to change to "the Mohammed" it would work better.
Symmetry wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Recently there was a shooter in Toronto. I heard some people talking on the radio about something that I had only heard among academics before. It's the idea of not naming the perpetrator after an attack to stop giving notoriety to them and (hopefully) not inspiring copycats.
It seems like a decent idea with one small issue. They suggest saying "the perpetrator" or "the suspect" instead of the name. Those names don't actually convey what happened, so if all media accounts were to change to "the Mohammed" it would work better.
DY, we get it. You don't like Muslims.
DoomYoshi wrote:Symmetry wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Recently there was a shooter in Toronto. I heard some people talking on the radio about something that I had only heard among academics before. It's the idea of not naming the perpetrator after an attack to stop giving notoriety to them and (hopefully) not inspiring copycats.
It seems like a decent idea with one small issue. They suggest saying "the perpetrator" or "the suspect" instead of the name. Those names don't actually convey what happened, so if all media accounts were to change to "the Mohammed" it would work better.
DY, we get it. You don't like Muslims.
This has nothing to do with Muslims. It has to do with terrorists.
Sophia hath builded her house, she hath hewn out her seven pillars:
She hath killed her beasts; she hath mingled her wine; she hath also furnished her table.
She hath sent forth her maidens: she crieth upon the highest places of the city,
Whoso is simple, let him turn in hither: as for him that wanteth understanding, she saith to him,
Come, eat of my bread, and drink of the wine which I have mingled.
King_Herpes wrote:The one called, DoomYoshi is resonating with an ideal that would proportedly strip the mudrerer/s of any further acknowledgement while respecting the privacy of those still affected and in mourning. Suggesting that sensationalizing such a crime is merely fearporn which no nation's youth has any moral buisness baring witness too. Instead, they should be glued to their electronic devices where they belong.
For those of you whom are just now getting acquainted with my secular views, I operate on an excellerated learning program which allows me to annoy the living piss out of you.
My name is Sofia.
mookiemcgee wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Symmetry wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Recently there was a shooter in Toronto. I heard some people talking on the radio about something that I had only heard among academics before. It's the idea of not naming the perpetrator after an attack to stop giving notoriety to them and (hopefully) not inspiring copycats.
It seems like a decent idea with one small issue. They suggest saying "the perpetrator" or "the suspect" instead of the name. Those names don't actually convey what happened, so if all media accounts were to change to "the Mohammed" it would work better.
DY, we get it. You don't like Muslims.
This has nothing to do with Muslims. It has to do with terrorists.
terrorists named Gordon!
warmonger1981 wrote:Pistis Sophia? Is that you?
DoomYoshi wrote:Dear God, what have we unleashed?Sophia hath builded her house, she hath hewn out her seven pillars:
She hath killed her beasts; she hath mingled her wine; she hath also furnished her table.
She hath sent forth her maidens: she crieth upon the highest places of the city,
Whoso is simple, let him turn in hither: as for him that wanteth understanding, she saith to him,
Come, eat of my bread, and drink of the wine which I have mingled.
riskllama wrote:do you work @ BK, Sofia?
Symmetry wrote:Urgh- this is going to be a thing for a while, isn't it?
HitRed wrote:He's on a roll
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee