Xi Orders Trump's Family To Perform For Him Like Seals

[mrswdk]

Trump shares video of granddaughter singing in Mandarin to Chinese President Xi Jinping

President Trump on Wednesday proudly shared with Chinese President Xi Jinping and first lady Peng Liyuan a video of his granddaughter Arabella Kushner speaking Mandarin and reciting traditional poetry.

Ivanka Trump, a mother of three, previously posted a clip of her eldest child singing a song celebrating Chinese New Year.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump ... le/2640128

[mrswdk]

"No please, you go first."

[betiko]

well done china! we want more show! Baron with a chinese monk haircut now!

[mrswdk]

Good idea!

Or maybe next time Kushner's in Beijing begging for Chinese money the mayor can get him up on stage dancing Gangnam Style dressed up like Fu Manchu.

[warmonger1981]

Just make sure you don't mock that national anthem

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/04/worl ... nthem.html

[waauw]

Just make sure you don't mock that national anthem

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/04/worl ... nthem.html

Yeah, imagine chinese players bending the knee against the national anthem.

[warmonger1981]

Just make sure you don't mock that national anthem

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/04/worl ... nthem.html

Yeah, imagine chinese players bending the knee against the national anthem.

But China is such a free country. That's why I mrs lives there.....Oh wait. I forgotten he lives thousands of miles away spouting how great China is without having to live there. I call that a back seat driver. Good for nothing but bullshit and cowhides.

[mrswdk]

Yeah, I presume the right to mock the national anthem is a right that you guys hold dear and have exercised numerous times through your life.

As far as anyone can tell that law has been introduced purely to try and prevent booing of the national anthem that has happened at some international sports events in Hong Kong. Countries like America might be happy to play out their internal divisions and political infighting in front of the whole world but some other countries aren't.

Similarly, leaders of some world countries like to act in a dignified manner when on the world stage but that doesn't mean they all do. For example, leaders of some countries (e.g. America) are perfectly happy to beg, kneel and roll over on stage if they think it'll make China like them more. To be honest I wouldn't be surprised if Ivanka's next trip to Beijing involves Jared dressing her up as Jessica Rabbit and getting her to twerk on stage if the mayor promises him a free tour of the Olympic Park as his reward.

[riskllama]

i would like to see that.

[saxitoxin]

Trump shares video of granddaughter singing in Mandarin to Chinese President Xi Jinping

President Trump on Wednesday proudly shared with Chinese President Xi Jinping and first lady Peng Liyuan a video of his granddaughter Arabella Kushner speaking Mandarin and reciting traditional poetry.

Ivanka Trump, a mother of three, previously posted a clip of her eldest child singing a song celebrating Chinese New Year.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump ... le/2640128

That's funny Trump's granddaughter learned four lines of Mandarin, while Xi's daughter spent four years at Harvard University getting plowed by big American dick every Saturday.

[mrswdk]

That's funny Trump's granddaughter learned four lines of Mandarin, while Xi's daughter spent four years at Harvard University getting plowed by big American dick every Saturday.

Xi Mingze was hard at work studying while she was at college:

Xi led a “frugal life” in Cambridge, according to Minemura. “She studied all the time,” he told me recently.

If you're looking for a president's daughter that's been taking dick from a young age, I think we need to return our gaze to your side of the Pacific:

[saxitoxin]

That's funny Trump's granddaughter learned four lines of Mandarin, while Xi's daughter spent four years at Harvard University getting plowed by big American dick every Saturday.

Xi Mingze was hard at work studying while she was at college:

studying dick

[mrswdk]

Now she's sat in the audience, studying the sadness in Jared Kushner's eyes as he dances Gangnam Style in a tutu for the amusement of Chinese industrial tycoons.

[saxitoxin]

Now she's sat in the audience, studying the sadness in Jared Kushner's eyes as he dances Gangnam Style in a tutu for the amusement of Chinese industrial tycoons.

That's a fantasy of yours. The only thing we know for sure is that Xi's daughter spent four years getting pounded by American dick, and upon return to China she was so disappointed by the selection of meats that she became a lesbo. And now Xi has to hide her in a cupboard. Same reason Kate Middleton isn't allowed to come to USA by herself. Fact.

[mrswdk]

[Bentelbow]

What are those parrots doing to each other?

[2dimes]

Where's the picture of Xi Mingze?

[mrswdk]

What are those parrots doing to each other?

Same thing those humans are about to do to each other.

[betiko]

No bras and pointy nipples while daddy hides his hard on with his hand and an awkward smile.

That reminds me of that interview where they ask donald what he and his daughter have in common and he replied without any hesitation... "sexxxxxx"!!!!!!

Poor jared! Is Arabella actually Baron's sister?

[waauw]

China: *fustrated*
Trump: "Wait, let me bend over."

APEC 2017: Why Trump’s Presidency Is an 'Enormous Gift' to China

Ahead of the opening of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit held in Vietnam, Ian Bremmer, president of the political consultancy Eurasia Group tweeted: “Every foreign leader I’ve spoken with at APEC thinks Trump presidency has been enormous gift for the Chinese.” U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest remarks in Da Nang demonstrated the reasons behind that consensus.

...In blunt language, Trump even attacked the general notion of multilateral and intergovernmental trade organizations — particularly the World Trade Organization (WTO) — right in front of a group of world leaders gathered for APEC — a typical multilateral trade entity.

...In contrast, Chinese President Xi Jinping in his keynote speech continued defending globalization, free trade, and multilateral organizations, calling for further cooperation and integration in the Asia-Pacific region, in line with what he said at the Davos World Economic Forum in January.

...No matter whether China will really abide by its promises in practice, Xi’s remarks above sounded much more appealing to the world than Trump’s striking rhetoric at the moment.

According to Christopher Johnson of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, China was actually looking forward to the APEC gathering — an unusual sentiment for Beijing — because Beijing knew that the Trump administration has no love for multilateral trade and hence Beijing would actively promote it instead.

The latest development at the APEC summit showed that China once again made the right moves, while, unfortunately, the United States did not.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/apec-2017-why-trumps-presidency-is-an-enormous-gift-to-china/

[mrswdk]

America is like the Joker, just wanting to watch Asia burn. It's okay though: China is ready to be the Batman Asia needs.

Even better, when translated to Chinese 'Batman' becomes 'Bat Hero'. Stable, supportive and gender-neutral. China: the only real choice for 2017!

[saxitoxin]

China: *fustrated*
Trump: "Wait, let me bend over."

APEC 2017: Why Trump’s Presidency Is an 'Enormous Gift' to China

Ahead of the opening of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit held in Vietnam, Ian Bremmer, president of the political consultancy Eurasia Group tweeted: “Every foreign leader I’ve spoken with at APEC thinks Trump presidency has been enormous gift for the Chinese.” U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest remarks in Da Nang demonstrated the reasons behind that consensus.

...In blunt language, Trump even attacked the general notion of multilateral and intergovernmental trade organizations — particularly the World Trade Organization (WTO) — right in front of a group of world leaders gathered for APEC — a typical multilateral trade entity.

...In contrast, Chinese President Xi Jinping in his keynote speech continued defending globalization, free trade, and multilateral organizations, calling for further cooperation and integration in the Asia-Pacific region, in line with what he said at the Davos World Economic Forum in January.

...No matter whether China will really abide by its promises in practice, Xi’s remarks above sounded much more appealing to the world than Trump’s striking rhetoric at the moment.

According to Christopher Johnson of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Washington think tank, China was actually looking forward to the APEC gathering — an unusual sentiment for Beijing — because Beijing knew that the Trump administration has no love for multilateral trade and hence Beijing would actively promote it instead.

The latest development at the APEC summit showed that China once again made the right moves, while, unfortunately, the United States did not.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/apec-2017-why-trumps-presidency-is-an-enormous-gift-to-china/

Bad analysis by a partisan, Clinton-aligned analyst (Eurasia Group).

A victory for China does not mean a loss for the United States.

The U.S. should not seek to punish China for the sake of punishing China. The U.S. needs win-win scenarios; it needs victories for China. This was a win-win.

The U.S. is an importer. Free trade is meaningless to it. Asia are exporters. They need it.

The U.S. and Asia relationship is symbiotic. Americans need Asians to man the assembly lines and sewing machines to build stuff for them. Asians need Americans - and American institutional control of the companies of the NASDAQ, NYSE, CBE, monetary control of the Federal Reserve, and IP jurisdiction of the USPTO, etc. - to give them stuff to build.

[waauw]

Bad analysis by a partisan, Clinton-aligned analyst (Eurasia Group).

A victory for China does not mean a loss for the United States.

The U.S. should not seek to punish China for the sake of punishing China. The U.S. needs win-win scenarios; it needs victories for China. This was a win-win.

The U.S. is an importer. Free trade is meaningless to it. Asia are exporters. They need it.

The U.S. and Asia relationship is symbiotic. Americans need Asians to man the assembly lines and sewing machines to build stuff for them. Asians need Americans - and American institutional control of the companies of the NASDAQ, NYSE, CBE, monetary control of the Federal Reserve, and IP jurisdiction of the USPTO, etc. - to give them stuff to build.

It's not about punishing, it's about finding common ground and improving relations, which Trump does not and Xi does.

As for calling the importer-exporter card, I'm afraid you're looking at it all wrong. The US certainly does have an interest in increasing its export and to drive up trade in general as fortifies the position of the USD, improves wealth influx and improves the global competitive positioning of US companies. All the institutions you just mentioned stand to lose a lot by ignoring the globalist trend. Don't mistake yourself, trade and power are inextricable from eachother. Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, France, Britain and finally the US, all became the dominant currencies and economies precisely because of trade. China knows this, Trump apparently does not.

If things keep up, the world won't be pushing to be involved on Wall Street, it will be talking its business to Hong-Kong and Shanghai.

[saxitoxin]

by ignoring the globalist trend

The globalist trend is dead. We replaced it with the nationalist trend. Didn't you get the memo?

The counter-hegemon (Trump, Putin, Kern, AfD, Brexit, and the Neo-Mercantilist world forces) is in the process of destroying the transnational bloc, as it was prophesied. The transnational bloc has, thus far, showed itself incapable of resisting the March of History we have unleashed.

Neo-Gramscianism perceives state sovereignty as subjugated to a global economic system marked by the emergence of a transnational financial system and a corresponding transnational system of production. The major players in these systems, multinational corporations and international financial institutions such as the World Bank and IMF, have evolved into a "transnational historic bloc" that exercises global hegemony (in contrast to the realist view of hegemony as the "predominant power of a state or a group of states").The historic bloc acquires its authority through the tacit consent of the governed population gained through coercive techniques of intellectual and cultural persuasion, largely absent violence. It links itself to other social groups that have been involved in political struggles to expand its influence and seeks to solidify its power through the standardization and liberalization of national economies, creating a single regulatory regime (e.g. World Trade Organization).

There are powerful forces opposing the progress of this historic bloc who may form counterhegemonies to challenge it as part of an open-ended class struggle. These might include neo-mercantilists who depend on the protection of tariffs and state subsidies. If a counterhegemony grows large enough it is able to subsume and replace the historic bloc it was born in. Neo-Gramscians use the Machiavellian terms war of position and war of movement to explain how this is possible. In a war of position a counterhegemonic movement attempts, through persuasion or propaganda, to increase the number of people who share its view on the hegemonic order; in a war of movement the counterhegemonic tendencies which have grown large enough overthrow, violently or democratically, the current hegemony and establish themselves as a new historic bloc.

We are tearing apart alliances, abrogating treaties, sabotaging elections, creating new media systems ... meanwhile, in France ...

[waauw]

Keep dreaming mate. You failed.