Moderator: Community Team
mookiemcgee wrote:First let me say I support Hillary Clinton in this election. I support a 3rd party candidate as well, however given the nature of the American system I would only use my vote in a national election on one of the 2 major parties. I do not think a Trump presidency bodes well for America or the world.
While I think a few of the things trump said, particularly admitting to not paying contractors and avoid federal income tax will not play well for him. However I see Trump as a very intelligent man, and most critically he is a master persuader. He is much more effective marketer, and a much more effective communicator. He has his faults... clearly. But he is far more effective at recovering from his mis-steps and fault than clinton is. In the end I think Trump will win the election based on what I'm seeing. Here are a few reason why:
1. Smart, well-informed people disagree on nearly all major issues. So being smart and well-informed doesn’t help you grasp reality as much as you would hope. If it did, all of the smart, well-informed people would agree. They don’t.
2. Trump says lots of things that don’t pass the fact-checkers’ tests. His supporters don’t care because facts don’t influence decisions. Humans decide first, then rationalize their irrational choices with cherry-picked data. You see this all the time with the people who disagree with your brilliance. Just remember that they see the same irrationality in you that you see in them.
3. Every candidate looks good until we learn more about that person’s past. Then every candidate looks terrible. But is it possible that only terrible people run for president and get to the final rounds?
4. Humans are not rational creatures. We are creatures who believe we are rational.
5. Trump always takes the extreme position on matters of safety and security for the country, even if those positions are unconstitutional, impractical, evil, or something that the military would refuse to do. Normal people see this as a dangerous situation. I see this as something called pacing and leading. Trump “paces” the public – meaning he matches them in their emotional state, and then some. He does that with his extreme responses on immigration, fighting ISIS, stop-and-frisk, etc. Once Trump has established himself as the biggest bad-ass on the topic, he is free to “lead,” which we see him do by softening his deportation stand, limiting his stop-and-frisk comment to Chicago, reversing his first answer on penalties for abortion, and so on.
6.Most of the job of president is persuasion. It's even more important as a skill to getting elected. Presidents don’t need to understand policy minutia. They need to listen to experts and then help sell the best expert solutions to the public. Trump sells better than anyone you have ever seen, even if you haven’t personally bought into him yet. You can’t deny his persuasion talents that have gotten him this far.
In summary, I don’t understand the policy details and implications of most of either Trump’s or Clinton’s proposed ideas. Neither do you. But I do understand persuasion. Hillary is so weak in terms of her persuasion skills, and Trump the best I've ever seen. I can only predict Trump will find a way to persuade enough people to win this election.
Phatscotty wrote:I caught the end of the debate. I didn't even know it was on until a friend snapchatted silly faces of them on his TV. That said, I haven't wasted a squirt on politics for almost a year now. That includes any cable news of any kind, NUTT! I tried to listen to what was going on for a minute here n there and all I got to see was trump waiting to speak because assholes in the audience never stfu so I didn't hear dick. The only Clinton stuff I know is thanks to saxi ffunzerss of Clinton almost passing out from too many opiates and something where she coughed for like 3 minutes straight. That said I think trump looked okay tonight. Hillary looked befuddled. I saw trump staying on topic about Japan and stamina and I saw Hillary resort to saying what Trump said in the past concerning nothing to do with politics per his alleged nasty word he said about a woman. Well Gee Whiz It's almost like exactly how I said it would be a couple years ago. I would really like to see Gary Johnson crash the debate and prop a rostrum until he gets arrested.
Bernie Sanders wrote:You caught the end of the debate?
Bernie Sanders wrote:Phatscotty wrote:I caught the end of the debate. I didn't even know it was on until a friend snapchatted silly faces of them on his TV. That said, I haven't wasted a squirt on politics for almost a year now. That includes any cable news of any kind, NUTT! I tried to listen to what was going on for a minute here n there and all I got to see was trump waiting to speak because assholes in the audience never stfu so I didn't hear dick. The only Clinton stuff I know is thanks to saxi ffunzerss of Clinton almost passing out from too many opiates and something where she coughed for like 3 minutes straight. That said I think trump looked okay tonight. Hillary looked befuddled. I saw trump staying on topic about Japan and stamina and I saw Hillary resort to saying what Trump said in the past concerning nothing to do with politics per his alleged nasty word he said about a woman. Well Gee Whiz It's almost like exactly how I said it would be a couple years ago. I would really like to see Gary Johnson crash the debate and prop a rostrum until he gets arrested.
You caught the end of the debate?
Go away you shrill.
Trump came off as uneducated and bombastic. Clinton won the debate.
Dukasaur wrote:I like how people keep talking after I already said everything there is to say...
catstevens wrote:Moderator: "Madame Secretary, will you promote a law to save unicorns, in order that brainless people can live in lalaland"?
- Hillary: "Yes, of course, and I'll provide to build sanctuaries for unicorns all around the Country, also I'll personally export our sanctuaries all around the world".
- Moderator: "That's a cute thing to know, our Allies will be satisfied and reassured now. Thank you Madame Secretary. Now, Mr. Trump, why do you like to kill unicorns"?
- Trump: "WTF"?
Bernie Sanders wrote:catstevens wrote:Moderator: "Madame Secretary, will you promote a law to save unicorns, in order that brainless people can live in lalaland"?
- Hillary: "Yes, of course, and I'll provide to build sanctuaries for unicorns all around the Country, also I'll personally export our sanctuaries all around the world".
- Moderator: "That's a cute thing to know, our Allies will be satisfied and reassured now. Thank you Madame Secretary. Now, Mr. Trump, why do you like to kill unicorns"?
- Trump: "WTF"?
oh gee....another political comedian.....You are as funny, as Trump is smart.
catstevens wrote:Lester Holt was a shill for her and Hillary had the questions in advance.
Symmetry wrote:catstevens wrote:Lester Holt was a shill for her and Hillary had the questions in advance.
Indeed. The whole thing was a fix. Clinton clearly went in knowing that there would be questions about the economy, and about foreign and domestic policy. Trump should have been told that those questions would be asked.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users