Conquer Club

Busting the real criminals who are trying to set up others

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Busting the real criminals who are trying to set up others

Postby xtratabasco on Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:22 pm

More and more of these stories are happening.



Cops plant drug labs in buildings and bust them to get more funding.

The biggest fire in the wests history (colorado) was started by a Forest Service Firefighter.

Gays smash in their apartments and are busted for staging it.

Now comes the Jewish girl who vandalizes her own dorm and blames it on anti-semitics.



Police: Jewish GW Student Admits Putting Swastikas On Her Door

POSTED: 5:08 pm EST November 5, 2007
UPDATED: 10:18 pm EST November 5, 2007


WASHINGTON -- George Washington University officials said a Jewish student who complained about swastikas showing up on her door put them there herself.

The student lives in Mitchell Hall, where half a dozen swastikas had shown up on her dorm room door in the past several weeks.

University police set up a hidden camera. They said the girl admitted responsibility Monday.


News 4 interviewed the student last week after the fifth swastika was discovered. She did not want to be identified.

"It's a big story," said Jake Sherman, GW Hatchet editor. "Thirty percent of GW students are Jewish"

Reporters at the GW Hatchet newspaper have been following the story since it began. They said they learned on Monday morning that the alleged victim would likely be implicated.

They said they spoke to her twice by phone.

According to reporters at the newspaper, the student said, "I wasn't looking to create this sort of insanity. I wasn't looking to become a media darling. I was just looking for acknowledgment from the university that someone drew a swastika on the door."

The student now faces disciplinary action from the school and could face criminal charges.


Previous Stories:
November 4, 2007: GW Makes Arrest In Swastikas Case
November 3, 2007: Another Swastika Appears At GW
November 2, 2007: Another Swastika Reported At GWU
October 31, 2007: Fifth Swastika Drawn On GW Student's Door
October 30, 2007: No Arrests Made In Apparent GW Hate Crime
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby luns101 on Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:50 pm

Xtra,

In your view what is the difference between a conservative and a neo-conservative?
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

Postby xtratabasco on Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:59 pm

luns101 wrote:Xtra,

In your view what is the difference between a conservative and a neo-conservative?



Well a conservative now like Rudi is laughable.

rudi is anti-gun
pro aboriton
pro gays
pro illegals
loves a police state and limits personal freedoms

does this sound like a conservative to you?
but it is to the sheep, hes the number 1 man for them.



I belive Ron Paul is a conservative/consitutionist



bush is surly not a conservative and nobody except Ron Paul even comes close.



now neo-cons are Liberal commies that left the Democrats in the 70s because they werent war mongers and Empire builders.


So In my views neo-cons are socialists/commies who love Empire building with out regards for the Constitution or Freedom or Liberty.
They love war, power, greed and love to put a boot in the subjects faces.

bush and company are neo-cons and this country is in big trouble.


why you ask?
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby b.k. barunt on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:04 am

The conservative is fruit for Bush and the neo-conservative used to be, but now looks for another bandwagon to jump on. I myself prefer the dead conservative.


Honibaz
User avatar
Cook b.k. barunt
 
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:33 pm

Postby luns101 on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:21 am

xtratabasco wrote:why you ask?


because I remember when Bill Clinton tried to delineate between Democrats & new Democrats. I didn't believe it for a second but it worked for him in the 1992 campaign.

It just seems like you're making the same kind of case on the Republican side now.
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

Postby autoload on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:23 am

I have a conservative style in Poker.
User avatar
Major autoload
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:24 am

luns101 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:why you ask?


because I remember when Bill Clinton tried to delineate between Democrats & new Democrats. I didn't believe it for a second but it worked for him in the 1992 campaign.

It just seems like you're making the same kind of case on the Republican side now.



well I guess im for the Constitution party, but whenever I say that I get some out there that want to push me on the abortion issue. which should probably be left to the women to answer.

what is your answer to the question you asked?
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby luns101 on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:27 am

xtratabasco wrote:well I guess im for the Constitution party, but whenever I say that I get some out there that want to push me on the abortion issue. which should probably be left to the women to answer.

what is your answer to the question you asked?


I don't really know, to be honest. Let's take myself for an example:

I am pro 2nd amendment
Against legalizing homosexual marriage
Against legalizing marijuana & other drugs
Against embryonic stem cell research
Against the income tax
Pro capital punishment
I support the Iraq war
-EDIT-
Forgot, I am also against abortion except to save the life of the mother

So where does that put me...as a conservative or a neo-conservative? What year did this line get crossed where the neo-conservatives became different than the conservatives?
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:32 am

luns101 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:well I guess im for the Constitution party, but whenever I say that I get some out there that want to push me on the abortion issue. which should probably be left to the women to answer.

what is your answer to the question you asked?


I don't really know, to be honest. Let's take myself for an example:

I am pro 2nd amendment
Against legalizing homosexual marriage
Against legalizing marijuana & other drugs
Against embryonic stem cell research
Against the income tax
Pro capital punishment
I support the Iraq war
-EDIT-
Forgot, I am also against abortion except to save the life of the mother

So where does that put me...as a conservative or a neo-conservative? What year did this line get crossed where the neo-conservatives became different than the conservatives?



probably right after Reagons assination attempt.

bush sr is a neo-con

google PNAC the list of neo-con heavy hitters is there.

Some also believe neo-cons are zionists and support the Jews even over our country.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby luns101 on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:35 am

xtratabasco wrote:probably right after Reagons assination attempt.

bush sr is a neo-con

google PNAC the list of neo-con heavy hitters is there.

Some also believe neo-cons are zionists and support the Jews even over our country.


Alright, can't say I agree but thanks for answering. I've had some fun with your posts in the past and probably will in the future. I just never knew why you believed what you believed and was curious.
User avatar
Major luns101
 
Posts: 2196
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:51 pm
Location: Oceanic Flight 815

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:40 am

luns101 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:probably right after Reagons assination attempt.

bush sr is a neo-con

google PNAC the list of neo-con heavy hitters is there.

Some also believe neo-cons are zionists and support the Jews even over our country.


Alright, can't say I agree but thanks for answering. I've had some fun with your posts in the past and probably will in the future. I just never knew why you believed what you believed and was curious.


at least you dont spam the shit out of them and willing to take part in a diolog with a shitty speller.

do you have any views on this topic?
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Hitman079 on Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:48 am

Image
User avatar
Cook Hitman079
 
Posts: 2986
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Tied up in your basement

Postby DaGip on Wed Nov 07, 2007 2:39 am

luns101 wrote:Xtra,

In your view what is the difference between a conservative and a neo-conservative?


I know this is a question for Xtra, but let me give you a little info from Alexander Haig in an interview with WolfBlitzer on CNN:

AL HAIG, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: Well, first, I think that this is a conflict that's essentially political. It's not just purely military. It's political and religious and ideological. And it was driven by the so-called neocons that hijacked my party, the Republican Party, before this administration...

BLITZER: Name names, Mr. Secretary. Who are you talking about?

HAIG: Well, I'm talking about...

BLITZER: Because a lot of our viewers hear the word "neocon" and they don't know what you're talking about.

HAIG: Well, they're a group of people who are ex-Democrats. Many of them hovered around the Seattle Conservative Democrats some years ago, who...

BLITZER: Who specifically are you referring to?

HAIG: I'm talking about Wolfowitz. I'm talking about Richard Perle. I'm talking about some newly-made ones. I'm talking about the former editor of the Wall Street Journal.

These people are very, very deeply embedded in Yale and certain intellectual circles. And for years, they've been against NATO...

BLITZER: But did they hijack the strategy, the policy, from the president of the United States, the vice president of the United States?

HAIG: Yes.

BLITZER: The secretary of state, the secretary of defense?

HAIG: Well, no, not the secretary of state, but he sat there and had to be a passenger on a train that he wasn't driving?

BLITZER: Was Rumsfeld a neocon?

HAIG: I wouldn't say he was. I wouldn't say...

BLITZER: But was he in charge of the military strategy?

HAIG: No, no. The outcome of the strategy was to create democracy with a bayonet.

BLITZER: Is Cheney a neocon?

HAIG: I think so.

BLITZER: So he's part of that neocon conspiracy, or cabal, or whatever?

HAIG: Those around him were, if he wasn't.

BLITZER: And they could basically influence the president and dictate to the president what to do, in terms of going to war against Saddam Hussein?

HAIG: Well, I'm not here to talk about that. There were a lot of influences on the president, but he's the president, and he's responsible.

Full Transcript @:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/ ... le.01.html


When I was supporting Bush, my dad told me that Bush was more of a Democrat than a Republican...I didn't understand that then, but I understand it now. And when I heard this interview, it really drove home what my dad was trying to get through my thick skull. By the way, my dad has been a loyal Democrat for years, but he hardly agrees with any of the Dems nowadays. He likes Joe Lieberman and he think Alan Colmes is "one of the good ones"...I think so to. I find myself agreeing alot with Alan Colmes lately and more against Shawn Hannity, when just a few years ago, I was all about Shawn Hannity and the Bush agenda...what a sucker I was. But still I would never vote for Kerry!
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class DaGip
 
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Postby heavycola on Wed Nov 07, 2007 4:34 am

xtratabasco wrote:
luns101 wrote:
xtratabasco wrote:probably right after Reagons assination attempt.

bush sr is a neo-con

google PNAC the list of neo-con heavy hitters is there.

Some also believe neo-cons are zionists and support the Jews even over our country.


Alright, can't say I agree but thanks for answering. I've had some fun with your posts in the past and probably will in the future. I just never knew why you believed what you believed and was curious.


at least you dont spam the shit out of them and willing to take part in a diolog with a shitty speller.

do you have any views on this topic?


Yes, i also hate jews, blacks and gays. And mexicans, obviously. Thank god for Ron Paul.
Image
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class heavycola
 
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:27 am

DaGip wrote:
luns101 wrote:Xtra,

In your view what is the difference between a conservative and a neo-conservative?


I know this is a question for Xtra, but let me give you a little info from Alexander Haig in an interview with WolfBlitzer on CNN:

AL HAIG, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: Well, first, I think that this is a conflict that's essentially political. It's not just purely military. It's political and religious and ideological. And it was driven by the so-called neocons that hijacked my party, the Republican Party, before this administration...

BLITZER: Name names, Mr. Secretary. Who are you talking about?

HAIG: Well, I'm talking about...

BLITZER: Because a lot of our viewers hear the word "neocon" and they don't know what you're talking about.

HAIG: Well, they're a group of people who are ex-Democrats. Many of them hovered around the Seattle Conservative Democrats some years ago, who...

BLITZER: Who specifically are you referring to?

HAIG: I'm talking about Wolfowitz. I'm talking about Richard Perle. I'm talking about some newly-made ones. I'm talking about the former editor of the Wall Street Journal.

These people are very, very deeply embedded in Yale and certain intellectual circles. And for years, they've been against NATO...

BLITZER: But did they hijack the strategy, the policy, from the president of the United States, the vice president of the United States?

HAIG: Yes.

BLITZER: The secretary of state, the secretary of defense?

HAIG: Well, no, not the secretary of state, but he sat there and had to be a passenger on a train that he wasn't driving?

BLITZER: Was Rumsfeld a neocon?

HAIG: I wouldn't say he was. I wouldn't say...

BLITZER: But was he in charge of the military strategy?

HAIG: No, no. The outcome of the strategy was to create democracy with a bayonet.

BLITZER: Is Cheney a neocon?

HAIG: I think so.

BLITZER: So he's part of that neocon conspiracy, or cabal, or whatever?

HAIG: Those around him were, if he wasn't.

BLITZER: And they could basically influence the president and dictate to the president what to do, in terms of going to war against Saddam Hussein?

HAIG: Well, I'm not here to talk about that. There were a lot of influences on the president, but he's the president, and he's responsible.

Full Transcript @:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/ ... le.01.html


When I was supporting Bush, my dad told me that Bush was more of a Democrat than a Republican...I didn't understand that then, but I understand it now. And when I heard this interview, it really drove home what my dad was trying to get through my thick skull. By the way, my dad has been a loyal Democrat for years, but he hardly agrees with any of the Dems nowadays. He likes Joe Lieberman and he think Alan Colmes is "one of the good ones"...I think so to. I find myself agreeing alot with Alan Colmes lately and more against Shawn Hannity, when just a few years ago, I was all about Shawn Hannity and the Bush agenda...what a sucker I was. But still I would never vote for Kerry!



yes, the neo-cons couldnt even wait "to win" in there own party, they had to hijack the Rep when the pendellum was swinging towards it.

Its ironic that blitz and hannity etc. wont even discuss the word neo-con.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm

Postby Nobunaga on Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:59 pm

... Neo-Cons, the term, has been defined as socially very conservative while financially very "liberal" (love to spend).

... Some add, "believeing in intervention foreign policy" to the definition. Seems to hold true at the moment.

...
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Nobunaga
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Postby xtratabasco on Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:01 pm

Nobunaga wrote:... Neo-Cons, the term, has been defined as socially very conservative while financially very "liberal" (love to spend).

... Some add, "believeing in intervention foreign policy" to the definition. Seems to hold true at the moment.

...



I dont know anyone except you, who defines them that way, maybe go back through this thread.
User avatar
Corporal xtratabasco
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:24 pm


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users