God damned Cultists

by **unriggable** on Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:23 am

"ChristianExodus.org is moving thousands of Christians to South Carolina to reestablish constitutionally limited government founded upon Christian principles. It is evident that the U.S. Constitution has been abandoned under our current federal system, and the efforts of Christian activism to restore our Godly republic have proven futile over the past three decades. The time has come for Christian Constitutionalists to protect our liberties in a State like South Carolina by interposing the State's sovereign authority retained under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The foundations of the United States of America were laid upon these principles, that the rights of man are God-given and inviolate, that the sole purpose of government is to secure these rights, and that the only just powers of government are those specifically delegated by the people. The federal government is restrained by Constitutional Law, the Sovereign States, and the Citizens of those States, each one made in the image of God, with individual rights to life, liberty, and property."

http://christianexodus.org/

by **magneticgoop** on Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:11 pm

wow some people like to decide what God wants them to do and think it means to recreate a nation that never really existed

by **MeDeFe** on Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:14 pm

Speaking of nations that never existed. Let's play "Name the game"!

Two words: Totally black

ok, from which game is this quote and which countrys flag is it about?

by **unriggable** on Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:55 pm

Medefe, what the hell are you talking abuot?!

by **MeDeFe** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:41 am

Think about it.

by **Syzygy** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:09 am

Wow, check out their poll:

What Hope is there for a Free Society?
A New World Order.
Reform at the Federal Level.
Reform at the State Level.
Reform at the County Level.
Reform in the Church.
Raise a Good Family.
Colonize Another Land.

by **Skittles!** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:13 am

Syzygy wrote:Wow, check out their poll:

What Hope is there for a Free Society?
A New World Order.
Reform at the Federal Level.
Reform at the State Level.
Reform at the County Level.
Reform in the Church.
Raise a Good Family.
Colonize Another Land.

I'm joining straight away with that attitude! Where can I sign up for this amazingly biased right-winged cultist group?

by **Syzygy** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:14 am

New World Order, FTW.

by **Nickbaldwin** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:18 am

and the results:

A New World Order. 11.61 % (121)
Reform at the Federal Level. 9.31 % (97)
Reform at the State Level. 5.37 % (56)
Reform at the County Level. 2.40 % (25)
Reform in the Church. 22.17 % (231)
Raise a Good Family. 14.20 % (148)
Colonize Another Land. 34.93 % (364)

by **Skittles!** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:26 am

Nickbaldwin wrote:and the results:

A New World Order. 11 %11 %11 % 11.61 % (121)
Reform at the Federal Level. 9 %9 %9 % 9.31 % (97)
Reform at the State Level. 5 %5 %5 % 5.37 % (56)
Reform at the County Level. 2 %2 %2 % 2.40 % (25)
Reform in the Church. 22 %22 %22 % 22.17 % (231)
Raise a Good Family. 14 %14 %14 % 14.20 % (148)
Colonize Another Land. 34 %34 %34 % 34.93 % (364)

Too many numbers. Too many damn votes.

by **Nickbaldwin** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:34 am

I find it funny how colonising a new land has the most votes.... People like that fucked up their countries so they want to make a new one....

It'll all end in tears

by **Skittles!** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:40 am

Nickbaldwin wrote:I find it funny how colonising a new land has the most votes.... People like that fucked up their countries so they want to make a new one....

It'll all end in tears

I'm really what country they can colonise as the UN would step in and such, not like the UN can do anything militarily. And I'm sure most Christian nations would support it.

by **comic boy** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:09 am

Skittles! wrote:
Nickbaldwin wrote:I find it funny how colonising a new land has the most votes.... People like that fucked up their countries so they want to make a new one....

It'll all end in tears

I'm really what country they can colonise as the UN would step in and such, not like the UN can do anything militarily. And I'm sure most Christian nations would support it.

Dont think most 'Christian nations ' would support it as they all have secular governments,doubt a huge number of individual Christians would support it either.

by **Skittles!** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:17 am

comic boy wrote:
Skittles! wrote:
Nickbaldwin wrote:I find it funny how colonising a new land has the most votes.... People like that fucked up their countries so they want to make a new one....

It'll all end in tears

I'm really what country they can colonise as the UN would step in and such, not like the UN can do anything militarily. And I'm sure most Christian nations would support it.

Dont think most 'Christian nations ' would support it as they all have secular governments,doubt a huge number of individual Christians would support it either.

Seeming the number of amazingly blind Christians is overwhelming, I have to stay on my previous comment.

by **Stopper** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:17 am

unriggable wrote:"ChristianExodus.org is moving thousands of Christians to South Carolina to reestablish constitutionally limited government founded upon Christian principles. It is evident that the U.S. Constitution has been abandoned under our current federal system, and the efforts of Christian activism to restore our Godly republic have proven futile over the past three decades. The time has come for Christian Constitutionalists to protect our liberties in a State like South Carolina by interposing the State's sovereign authority retained under the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

This isn't an original idea or anything, though, is it?

I'd never heard of the strategy of moving large numbers of fellow activists to a single, small, US state, presumably in the hopes of taking over the local state government, until "Jesse, Bad Boy" told us all, in this forum, about his and his fellow anarcho-capitalists' plans for taking over, er, New Hampshire, I think it was. I wonder how that went.

by **Skittles!** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:18 am

I wonder where Jessy, Bad Boy is actually. He's not in the RS forum. I think he's on a holiday; again.

by **MeDeFe** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:28 am

We could move all the anarcho-capitalists to South Carolina as well, that would be fun.

by **comic boy** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:33 am

Its not at all an original idea,it has actually been achieved by extremist political groups in Britain but only at a very minor level. It relies on the apathy of most of the electorate who cant be bothered to go to political meetings or even use their vote,local elections over here get an average turn out of about 30% !
I doubt it would be terribly effective in the USA because the major issues are settled at Federal level,they might end up controlling a few counties like the Amish I suppose.

by **Stopper** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:45 am

comic boy wrote:Its not at all an original idea,it has actually been achieved by extremist political groups in Britain but only at a very minor level. It relies on the apathy of most of the electorate who cant be bothered to go to political meetings or even use their vote,local elections over here get an average turn out of about 30% !
I doubt it would be terribly effective in the USA because the major issues are settled at Federal level,they might end up controlling a few counties like the Amish I suppose.

By extremist political groups in the UK, do you just mean the targeting of election campaigns on particular seats (which the mainstream parties do as well)?

I ask because I think this (and the anarcho-capitalists' campaign) actually involves relocating thousands of people to a particular state (and probably particular counties within that state.) That's what strikes me as weird about it - that needs a hell of a lot more political dedication than just going out canvassing every other weekend, that's for sure.

But, yes, I can't see you'd get a particularly effective end result, even if you did overwhelm a particular state with your nutty hordes. Maybe make a UDI or something?

by **btownmeggy** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:58 am

Skittles! wrote:I wonder where Jessy, Bad Boy is actually. He's not in the RS forum. I think he's on a holiday; again.

I thought he was in the process of moving to Australia.

by **comic boy** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 12:00 pm

Stopper wrote:
comic boy wrote:Its not at all an original idea,it has actually been achieved by extremist political groups in Britain but only at a very minor level. It relies on the apathy of most of the electorate who cant be bothered to go to political meetings or even use their vote,local elections over here get an average turn out of about 30% !
I doubt it would be terribly effective in the USA because the major issues are settled at Federal level,they might end up controlling a few counties like the Amish I suppose.

By extremist political groups in the UK, do you just mean the targeting of election campaigns on particular seats (which the mainstream parties do as well)?

I ask because I think this (and the anarcho-capitalists' campaign) actually involves relocating thousands of people to a particular state (and probably particular counties within that state.) That's what strikes me as weird about it - that needs a hell of a lot more political dedication than just going out canvassing every other weekend, that's for sure.

But, yes, I can't see you'd get a particularly effective end result, even if you did overwhelm a particular state with your nutty hordes. Maybe make a UDI or something?

Im talking about activists moving to a particular council ward (these can be won with as little as 150 votes) I agree it is by no means on anywhere near the same scale but it is a similar ploy, usually however the desired result is publicity rather than any realistic attempt at power.

by **Skittles!** on Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:57 pm

btownmeggy wrote:
Skittles! wrote:I wonder where Jessy, Bad Boy is actually. He's not in the RS forum. I think he's on a holiday; again.

I thought he was in the process of moving to Australia.

Ah, well, I dono. Your guess is probably better than mine