Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:Legally CA does not even have the authority to legalize shipments of controlled substances across state lines. Just another idiotic thread by you
what,me worry? wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Legally CA does not even have the authority to legalize shipments of controlled substances across state lines. Just another idiotic thread by you
They can choose what to enforce and not enforce
Looking the other way is cheaper than passing law. Loo at their stance on ferrets and immigration, dunce
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:what,me worry? wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Legally CA does not even have the authority to legalize shipments of controlled substances across state lines. Just another idiotic thread by you
They can choose what to enforce and not enforce
Looking the other way is cheaper than passing law. Loo at their stance on ferrets and immigration, dunce
They cannot choose which federal laws they want to enforce, they only have authority over state laws. Moving something across state lanes makes it federal.
If you look at immigration, Ca is obeying federal laws. Perhaps begrudgingly but they are.
Someone you know may own a ferret in CA, however they are breaking the law. It is just a state law they are breaking and in theory CA could decriminlize that (though they won't, it would be easier to just change the law). Right now, if caught they would be punished for their ferret, so in what world does that have anything to do with decriminalizing shipments of mushrooms across state lines? People in CA buy and consume mushrooms all the time now, just like people own ferrets. It's still illegal.
Maybe when you sober up and think about it you will realized how stupid this idea is.
You play conquer club, you are not a politician
You are forgiven
what,me worry? wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:what,me worry? wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Legally CA does not even have the authority to legalize shipments of controlled substances across state lines. Just another idiotic thread by you
They can choose what to enforce and not enforce
Looking the other way is cheaper than passing law. Loo at their stance on ferrets and immigration, dunce
They cannot choose which federal laws they want to enforce, they only have authority over state laws. Moving something across state lanes makes it federal.
If you look at immigration, Ca is obeying federal laws. Perhaps begrudgingly but they are.
Someone you know may own a ferret in CA, however they are breaking the law. It is just a state law they are breaking and in theory CA could decriminlize that (though they won't, it would be easier to just change the law). Right now, if caught they would be punished for their ferret, so in what world does that have anything to do with decriminalizing shipments of mushrooms across state lines? People in CA buy and consume mushrooms all the time now, just like people own ferrets. It's still illegal.
Maybe when you sober up and think about it you will realized how stupid this idea is.
Actually, yes you can
The sheriff in a county or a governor in a state can choose which laws to turn the volume down on and which ones to focus on as trends change
You play conquer club, you are not a politician
You are forgiven
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
jimboston wrote:
Furthermore, it’s still illegal to ship Marijuana across state lines. I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure all the Marijuana sold here legally in Marijuana Dispensaries in Massachusetts is also grow in Massachusetts. This is so Massachusetts Authorities can regulate (and tax) the production and sale... and avoid violating additional Federal Laws that might bring down enforcement. (At least all the packages I’ve seen say “Grown in Massachusetts” on them.)
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
what,me worry? wrote:The admistration decides what to focus on
They literally have more pressing business. Decriminalizing and enacting new law takes more time
Not focusing on issues is a way to dip your toe in the water and take future action (kicking the can down the road)
This is how weed became legal in CA
It followed a life cycle, dummies
what,me worry? wrote:It can be decriminalized, not by the sheriff
I'm done with this disingenuous conversation
You've all proven to engage in trollism instead of attmepting to further the conversation
Enjoy your dumb voices
what,me worry? wrote:The admistration decides what to focus on
They literally have more pressing business. Decriminalizing and enacting new law takes more time
Not focusing on issues is a way to dip your toe in the water and take future action (kicking the can down the road)
This is how weed became legal in CA
It followed a life cycle, dummies
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
Users browsing this forum: No registered users