1756244728
1756244728 Conquer Club • View topic - China reaches for the Basketball
Conquer Club

China reaches for the Basketball

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby mrswdk on Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:33 pm

mookie wrote:Should the US ban a Chinese company if one employee in any sort of managerial position posted something supportive of Black Live Matter?


False equivalency. As others have said, the Chinese government played no part in this NBA story. A valid comparison would be, should a Chinese company censor one of its employees if that employee posts something supportive of the Occupy movement?

If an employee of my (UK) company used an official, company-linked Twitter account to post messages in support of a US protest movement I would expect them to be told to take it down. Political protests in the US have nothing to do with our business and posting about those sorts of issues is divisive. It risks needlessly pissing off potential clients and collaborators.

Not allowing corporate accounts to be used to support political causes is totally standard practice.
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby mookiemcgee on Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:25 pm

mrswdk wrote:
mookie wrote:Should the US ban a Chinese company if one employee in any sort of managerial position posted something supportive of Black Live Matter?


False equivalency. As others have said, the Chinese government played no part in this NBA story. A valid comparison would be, should a Chinese company censor one of its employees if that employee posts something supportive of the Occupy movement?

If an employee of my (UK) company used an official, company-linked Twitter account to post messages in support of a US protest movement I would expect them to be told to take it down. Political protests in the US have nothing to do with our business and posting about those sorts of issues is divisive. It risks needlessly pissing off potential clients and collaborators.

Not allowing corporate accounts to be used to support political causes is totally standard practice.


I actually agree with the idea that buisness should take care of business, and there should be accountability from the guy who tweeted...but if state owned media pulled coverage of the event in reaction that is the chinese gov't involving itself. Then again, I'm not saying the US is much better anymore if the AG gets to fire Fox News anchors.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/shep-smith-out-at-fox-news-one-day-after-bill-barrs-meeting-with-rupert-murdoch/?fbclid=IwAR1afTmYgXR9l_o1TosKD5Xa2X-L4tlV1wOeYQMKU9qwv2mHl0ExLrKtIX4
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
User avatar
Colonel mookiemcgee
 
Posts: 5702
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:33 pm
Location: Northern CA

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby spurgistan on Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:47 pm

mrswdk wrote:
spurgistan wrote:State Sanctioned Amazon Equivalent (Alibaba)


Alibaba is a Chinese company, therefore it is controlled by the Chinese government! McCarthy would be proud.

Do you ever stop and wonder whether the propaganda you're fed might not be the whole story, or do you just trust that the five people who control all of US government and media are fair, unbiased and full imparters of all truth in the world?


I didn't write that.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.


Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Sergeant spurgistan
 
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby mrswdk on Sun Oct 13, 2019 4:48 am

spurgistan wrote:
mrswdk wrote:
spurgistan wrote:State Sanctioned Amazon Equivalent (Alibaba)


Alibaba is a Chinese company, therefore it is controlled by the Chinese government! McCarthy would be proud.

Do you ever stop and wonder whether the propaganda you're fed might not be the whole story, or do you just trust that the five people who control all of US government and media are fair, unbiased and full imparters of all truth in the world?


I didn't write that.


My bad @tzor
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby spurgistan on Mon Oct 14, 2019 12:20 pm

mrswdk wrote:
mookie wrote:Should the US ban a Chinese company if one employee in any sort of managerial position posted something supportive of Black Live Matter?


False equivalency. As others have said, the Chinese government played no part in this NBA story. A valid comparison would be, should a Chinese company censor one of its employees if that employee posts something supportive of the Occupy movement?

If an employee of my (UK) company used an official, company-linked Twitter account to post messages in support of a US protest movement I would expect them to be told to take it down. Political protests in the US have nothing to do with our business and posting about those sorts of issues is divisive. It risks needlessly pissing off potential clients and collaborators.

Not allowing corporate accounts to be used to support political causes is totally standard practice.


Daryl Morey used his personal Twitter account to send a tweet supporting Hong Kong. The Rocket's owner told him to delete it despite it not being a corporate account.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.


Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Sergeant spurgistan
 
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby tzor on Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:16 pm

jonesthecurl wrote:A quick count shows me that I've boarded planes in at least 10 countries in the last 10 years. I have always had to show ID. The ID check is before you go to your gate, thus applies to all flights (international and domestic) in each of these.


Traditionally, the use of ID was only to verify you were the one to whom the plane ticket / reservation is for. Then when security checks insisted that only ticketed passengers be at the gates, identification, along with the ticket was required. But now you need either a passport or a bio metric driver's license in order to get to the gate area.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby tzor on Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:25 pm

mrswdk wrote:Alibaba is a Chinese company, therefore it is controlled by the Chinese government! McCarthy would be proud.


Alibaba is a Chinese Company.
Alibaba was run by Jack Ma.
Jack Ma is a Communist Party member (Thanks Reuters!)
The Communist Party IS THE GOVERNMENT of China.
Therefore " it is controlled by the Chinese government!"
Q.E.D.
The People’s Daily revealed Ma’s Party membership in a list of 100 people it said had helped drive the country “reform and opening up” process. Ma is China’s richest man with a fortune of $35.8 billion, according to Forbes.

It was unclear why the paper chose to mention Ma’s affiliation now but it comes amid a push by Beijing to bring the country’s private enterprises more in line with Party values, especially in the technology sector that has grown rapidly, driven by the successes of private firms.

Jack Ma is now retired ... I wonder why?
It is believed that through his retirement, Ma has avoided being caught up in the Chinese government’s crackdown of big dealmakers in recent years, such as HNA Group’s Wang Jian, Anbang Insurance Group’s Wu Xiaohui, and movie star Fan Bingbing. The latter two “disappeared” for months at one point, according to observers.

“He’s getting an airlift before the hammer falls because he clearly would have been the most high-profile scalp within the private sector,” said Howie, adding that Ma’s case also fires a warning shot across the bow of the country’s rich and famous.

Additionally, the fact that some of the country’s tycoons, including Ma, have pledged to hand over control of their businesses to the Communist Party if needed, epitomizes the lopsided relationship between the state and the private sector under the leadership of President Xi Jinping.
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: China reaches for the Basketball

Postby mrswdk on Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:31 pm

tzor wrote:Jack Ma is a Communist Party member (Thanks Reuters!)
The Communist Party IS THE GOVERNMENT of China.
Therefore " it is controlled by the Chinese government!"


The CEO of FedEx is a Republican Party member.
The Republican Party IS THE GOVERNMENT of America.
Therefore Fedex "is controlled by the American government!"
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users