waauw wrote:mrswdk wrote:waauw wrote:I'm not saying the french acted completely correctly but you stupidly compared France with Idi Amin's militaristic régime, where the military acted as police and killed 300.000 Ugandan citizens. You're a fucking moron if you think the French are sending their troops on the streets with bazooka's and machineguns to massacre their own people.
I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying the French government are sending their police onto the street with guns, tear gas and batons with which to trample and oppress foreigners, Roma and Muslims. If there is one thing the white, Christian police are
not doing it is attacking the white, Christian civilian majority.
The similarities with Idi Amin's Uganda are more in the seizing of supreme power through of a 'temporary' state of emergency (extended indefinitely), the suppression of dissident voices, and the violent intimidation and scapegoating of minority groups. Not forgetting all the swivel-eyed appeals to nationalist sentiment ('Vive la France') and deliberate creation of a climate of fear and suspicion with which to justify the government's increasingly oppressive rule.
Then don't make the comparison with Idi Amin Dada if you want to avoid talking about his crimes against humanity!
Just because France differs in the personnel it chooses to use as its primary mechanism for suppressing its population and the weapons it gives them doesn't mean you get to go 'look, everything is different!'. There are many parallels between Idi Amin and Francois Hollande's governments, and crimes against humanity is one of them. Or are France's crimes against humanity (bombing in Libya, bombing in Syria) somehow not counted just because
The state of emergency can be lifted through vote of parliament
So could Idi Amin's. But, in both Amin's France and Hollande's Uganda, parliament opted to keep on extending their 'temporary' state of emergency rather than repeal it.
'Yeah, I know we keep extending it, and I know that last time we said we'd get rid of it, but we thought about it and decided we actually need to extend it one more time. Don't worry, we'll get rid of it next time.' Yeah yeah, we've heard that one before.
dissident voices aren't suppressed at all
Unless they happen to be dissident voices which express political sentiment the government stands opposed to (anti-Semitic, Holocaust deniers, Nazis, Islamists) in which case they are stamped all over.
Or if their only crime is being Muslim in a French city or being Roma in a French country. Then they don't even need to say anything to get stamped all over by the state.
It's not as if racism has been institutionalized and has become the national dogma.
Tell that to the mosques being raided, the Muslims banned from practicing their faith and the Roma being burned out of their homes. Or to the large swathes of the French population who are now voting for La Pen!
Nationalism will always exist in proud nations, nothing special there, most strong nations are nationalist.
Deutschland Deutschland uber alles!