Moderator: Community Team
jgordon1111 wrote:so again why is the establishment trying to ensure TRUMP doesn't win even at the cost of billary winning?
patches70 wrote:jgordon1111 wrote:so again why is the establishment trying to ensure TRUMP doesn't win even at the cost of billary winning?
Because in a Trump vs Hillary for President it is either cast your vote for Trump or cast your vote for Goldman Sachs.
Rubio, Cruz, Hillary are all Sachs candidates. Trump and Sanders are not.
The Economist just had an editorial about why Trump can't be allowed to win and you should see the list of who is on the board of directors for The Economist. They are the 1% of the 1% lemme tell ya.
And Trump ain't gonna build a wall. He's not going to kick the Muslims out or stop Muslim immigration. Congress has the purse strings so unless Trump wants to build the wall using his own money (which even he doesn't have nearly enough to pay for that) and the President doesn't make immigration law. He only says what he says to get votes, just like any other candidate making promises they know they can't keep.
Cruz's wife as you know works for Goldman Sachs. He also got a substantial loan from Goldman Sachs as well. The #1 campaign donor for Rubio is Goldman Sachs and as we all know Hillary been paid over $21 million since leaving the State department from investment banks with Goldman paying a nice chunk of that.
Goldman Sachs contributions to Trump? $0.
That's why the Republican establishment doesn't want Trump. It's why the Democrat establishment doesn't want Sanders. They ain't Sachs men.
jgordon1111 wrote:I think I made the Goldman Sachs connection in the TRUMP not a Christian thread, but thank you for the follow up wasn't aware of Rubio, but yes on both Cruz and billary
patches70 wrote:jgordon1111 wrote:I think I made the Goldman Sachs connection in the TRUMP not a Christian thread, but thank you for the follow up wasn't aware of Rubio, but yes on both Cruz and billary
Goldman Sachs was giving the lion's share to Jeb until it became apparent Jeb wasn't gonna get it done. Between October through December Rubio received over $107,000 directly from Sachs and that's not counting what they put into PAC's supporting Rubio.
Also, a guy named Joseph Wall, who works for Goldman Sachs as a lobbyist, is a campaign bundler for the Rubio campaign.
With Jeb, Sachs gave his campaign $773,000 prior to the fourth quarter. In the last three months of 2015 Goldman Sachs had only donated a mere $2,950. You can see how Sachs shifted from Jeb to Rubio when it became clear that Jeb wasn't doing well.
Rubio is now the last best hope for the investment banks. Cruz is completely under control, after all his wife is basically a Goldman Sachs handler. And of course, Hillary, she's the highest paid of all the candidates from both parties. She's certainly a Sachs creature.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users