Moderator: Community Team
darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.
Mr. Know It All wrote:Bertros Bertros wrote:I bought a new machine for Vista (admittedly its ridiculously overpowered) and have had nothing but joy from my Vista experience... It's super from all aspects as far as I'm concerned though as with any OS there is a little bit of a transition whilst you get used to what (which to the average user is not actually very much) has changed... and besides you can play with Aero windows effects when your on the phone to someone boring so all round thumbs up for Vista...
I use Windows for everything which is really only work and pleasure and the lines are blurred there for me anyway... Nothing wrong with Linux but really I mean really who wants to get involved in all that greasy haired open source milarkey, Suse is OK I suppose but I want compatibility and out of the box happiness...
Macs are for people who care more what the box their computer is in looks like than what it does... don't come telling me the hardware is better cos its the same components inside that fanyc plastic shell, and don't go telling me the OS is better cause its just *nix with a fancy skin and you have to drop to the very hidden command line to do anything vaguely technical with it...
[insert some poncey mac user whining about superior performance for music editing blah blah 10 years out of date bullshit etc]
... I used to use exclusively Mac and *nix and was fully subscribed to the "I hate Bill" club with a lifetime membership... then I grew up!
Still vista is not conpatible with nearly 80% of my current software
Bertros Bertros wrote:Mr. Know It All wrote:Bertros Bertros wrote:I bought a new machine for Vista (admittedly its ridiculously overpowered) and have had nothing but joy from my Vista experience... It's super from all aspects as far as I'm concerned though as with any OS there is a little bit of a transition whilst you get used to what (which to the average user is not actually very much) has changed... and besides you can play with Aero windows effects when your on the phone to someone boring so all round thumbs up for Vista...
I use Windows for everything which is really only work and pleasure and the lines are blurred there for me anyway... Nothing wrong with Linux but really I mean really who wants to get involved in all that greasy haired open source milarkey, Suse is OK I suppose but I want compatibility and out of the box happiness...
Macs are for people who care more what the box their computer is in looks like than what it does... don't come telling me the hardware is better cos its the same components inside that fanyc plastic shell, and don't go telling me the OS is better cause its just *nix with a fancy skin and you have to drop to the very hidden command line to do anything vaguely technical with it...
[insert some poncey mac user whining about superior performance for music editing blah blah 10 years out of date bullshit etc]
... I used to use exclusively Mac and *nix and was fully subscribed to the "I hate Bill" club with a lifetime membership... then I grew up!
Still vista is not conpatible with nearly 80% of my current software
That suxs, I feel your pain... what software, the only thing that hasn't worked for me is Notepad2 which I can live without...
Bertros Bertros wrote:As far as gaming goes both Stalker and Rainbow Six Vegas are visually beautiful and play like a dream on Vista.... though this probably has little to do with Vista per se and more to do with the hardware its running on... Halo is for living room gamers, poor deluded souls...
Spuzzell wrote:Bertros Bertros wrote:As far as gaming goes both Stalker and Rainbow Six Vegas are visually beautiful and play like a dream on Vista.... though this probably has little to do with Vista per se and more to do with the hardware its running on... Halo is for living room gamers, poor deluded souls...
Ha. Stalker wouldn't run smoothly even on HAL from 2001.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
zomboli wrote:Friends don't let Friends buy Vista...
Its like a beta & I don't pay like 200+$ for betas
I don't care what you say it has been bench marked many times and currently its boggs your system down more than XP obviously hurting performance so Ill stick with my modded XP cuz it looks way kooler and I don't have the driver bugs ~n~ stuff
Bertros Bertros wrote:You are very right, Vista is way more resource intensive than XP in much the same way that XP is way more resource intensive than 2000... Bitching that Vista is more hungry than XP is like bitching that a 6.0 Litre Hummer uses more fuel than an Audi... its an absolute given that it will...
So I wouldn't advocate Vista to anyone who isn't prepared to fork out for some hardware that can cope with it. However if you are, get it! Its awesome, its not a Beta ffs, XP was a beta... Microsoft have delayed the release of Vista by years to avoid exactly that and with great success from my experience... Its not for everybody yet, but it doesn't deserve running down because of that....
On a side note - modding is wierd! Why put fancy coloured lights in your box, or have a see through panel on the side, or water cooling when you can spend the money on more memory or an extra gfx card... and as for bogging down your PC dodgy skins on top of XP are about the most effective method out there, aren't they?
EDIT: You could, and no doubt some body will, argue that Vista is a dogy skin on XP so I thought I'd beat them to it!
The1exile wrote:Bertros Bertros wrote:You are very right, Vista is way more resource intensive than XP in much the same way that XP is way more resource intensive than 2000... Bitching that Vista is more hungry than XP is like bitching that a 6.0 Litre Hummer uses more fuel than an Audi... its an absolute given that it will...
So I wouldn't advocate Vista to anyone who isn't prepared to fork out for some hardware that can cope with it. However if you are, get it! Its awesome, its not a Beta ffs, XP was a beta... Microsoft have delayed the release of Vista by years to avoid exactly that and with great success from my experience... Its not for everybody yet, but it doesn't deserve running down because of that....
On a side note - modding is wierd! Why put fancy coloured lights in your box, or have a see through panel on the side, or water cooling when you can spend the money on more memory or an extra gfx card... and as for bogging down your PC dodgy skins on top of XP are about the most effective method out there, aren't they?
EDIT: You could, and no doubt some body will, argue that Vista is a dogy skin on XP so I thought I'd beat them to it!
You can't play decent games on Vista because it says insufficient OS privileges.
Don't get it. I did, and it sucks (figured it must have improved from the evaluation version... nope).
And the delay of Vista was because they scrapped Longhorn, and then basically salvaged everything out of that to put into the new OS.
Maybe it'll get better after they issue all the fixes (like service packs 1 and 2 for XP, or second edition for 98...). But don't hold your breath.
Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun